Simple Science

Cutting edge science explained simply

# Biology # Cancer Biology

Battling Glioblastoma: The Fight for Life

Researchers strive to improve outcomes for glioblastoma patients through innovative treatments.

Richard J.R. Elliott, Peter Nagle, Muhammad Furqan, John C. Dawson, Aoife McCarthy, Alison F Munro, Camilla Drake, Gillian M Morrison, Michael Marand, Daniel Ebner, Steven M. Pollard, Valerie G Brunton, Margaret C Frame, Neil O. Carragher

― 6 min read


Fighting Glioblastoma: Fighting Glioblastoma: Hope Ahead aggressive brain cancer. New treatments offer hope against
Table of Contents

Glioblastoma, often abbreviated as GBM, is the most common and aggressive type of brain tumor. It is a grade IV astrocytoma, which means it is high grade and quite nasty. This tumor arises from glial cells, which support and protect nerve cells. Imagine your brain as a busy city, with neurons as the main roads and glial cells as the maintenance crew. GBM is like a construction project that goes way over its budget and time, causing chaos in the city.

The Struggles of Treating GBM

GBM is notoriously difficult to treat. Mortality rates have been climbing in places like the UK, especially for people over 60. Despite advancements in medicine, survival rates haven't improved much, remaining at less than 5% five years after diagnosis. This means that if you get diagnosed with GBM, your odds of making it to the five-year mark are about as good as finding a needle in a haystack-only the haystack is also on fire!

Since 2005, a treatment protocol that includes radiation and a chemotherapy drug called temozolomide has been the go-to approach. While it has extended survival by a few months, that's just a drop in the bucket compared to what patients hope for, which is a cure.

What Makes GBM So Tough?

The complexity of GBM is jaw-dropping. Researchers have found that the biology of GBM is highly varied, which means that no two tumors are exactly alike. This diversity complicates treatment options and creates a situation where therapies that work for one tumor might not work for another, similar to how some people can eat spicy food without crying while others need a gallon of milk nearby.

Adding to the mix, there are special cells known as GBM Stem Cells (GSCs). These cells are like the pesky weeds in your garden-they can regenerate themselves and resist Treatments. They thrive in a supportive environment that helps them grow and adapt, making them even trickier to tackle.

The Rise of New Technologies

In recent years, new technologies have emerged that allow scientists to study GBM in greater detail. This includes single-cell transcriptomics, which looks at the genetic makeup of individual cells. Researchers are also using advanced imaging techniques to gather more information about how tumors behave.

These technological advancements open the door to understanding GBM better and possibly finding new treatments. One promising approach involved a clinical trial testing a combination of Drugs targeting specific mutations found in some GBM patients. While this trial showed some positive results, it highlighted the challenge of treating a disease where only a small percentage of patients have the type of mutation the drugs target.

The Drug Development Dilemma

In the race to find effective GBM treatments, the journey has been complicated. Many drugs that researchers hoped would work have failed in clinical trials. This has led to a rethink about how to develop new drugs. Instead of focusing solely on specific targets in the tumor, researchers are now looking at the overall behavior and characteristics of the tumor cells.

One approach that has gained attention is Phenotypic Drug Discovery (PDD). This method involves studying how drugs affect the entire cell rather than just focusing on a single molecular target. It's a bit like trying different spices in a recipe until you find the perfect combination instead of just adding salt and calling it a day.

Screening for New Treatments

One of the methods researchers are using to find new treatments for GBM is through extensive drug screening. In this process, various compounds are tested on patient-derived GSC models. The goal is to pinpoint compounds that can effectively kill these resilient stem cells.

In a recent screening effort, researchers tested a library of drugs against six different GSC lines, covering various subtypes of GBM. They looked for compounds that could make a significant impact on the survival and behavior of these cells. After screening nearly 4,000 different compounds, the researchers were able to identify over 200 that showed some promise.

A Closer Look at the Candidates

Among the promising candidates were well-known classes of drugs, including those that target the cell cycle, apoptosis (or programmed cell death), and other crucial processes in the cell life. Some of these drugs had previously been used in other cancers, so the hope was to repurpose them for GBM.

One group of drugs that stood out was a type of inhibitor known for targeting Histone Deacetylases (HDACs). These compounds have shown potential in treating various cancers. Researchers tested a specific library of HDAC inhibitors to see how effective they could be against GSCs. Some of them turned out to be incredibly potent, with one candidate, fimepinostat, showing particularly encouraging results.

CDK Inhibitors to the Rescue?

Another class of drugs, called Cyclin-Dependent Kinase (CDK) inhibitors, has also shown effectiveness against GBM. CDKs are critical for cell cycle regulation, making them attractive targets for cancer therapy. In an experiment, several CDK inhibitors demonstrated strong activity against GSC lines, leading researchers to suggest that further exploration of these agents might bear fruit.

The Joy of Drug Combinations

Researchers are not just stopping at individual drug testing; they're also looking into combining drugs. The idea is that the combined effects might be more powerful than any single agent. Some early combination studies showed promising results with HDAC and CDK inhibitors working together.

The logic behind this is that if one drug weakens the tumor cells, another might finish the job. It's like a tag team in wrestling, where one wrestler distracts the opponent while the other delivers a knockout punch.

What’s Next?

While the findings are promising, it's important to remember that there's still much work to do. Researchers are continuing to delve into the findings, looking for ways to refine these compounds further. The goal is to develop safe and effective treatments that can improve the odds of survival for GBM patients.

In the grand scheme of things, the ongoing research represents hope. Though GBM is a difficult foe, advances in technology and deeper understanding of the disease provide a path toward better treatments.

Conclusion

Glioblastoma is a challenging medical condition that impacts many lives, but researchers are hard at work, trying to figure out how to tackle this beast. Through understanding its complexities and the power of innovative treatments, there is hope for the future. Whether it’s with new drugs, combinations of existing therapies, or better ways to deliver them, the battle against GBM is far from over. While it might feel like David vs. Goliath, with each new discovery, there’s a stronger chance that David will come out on top!

Original Source

Title: A comprehensive pharmacological survey across heterogeneous patient-derived GBM stem cell models

Abstract: Despite substantial drug discovery investments, the lack of any significant therapeutic advancement in the treatment of glioblastoma (GBM) over the past two decades calls for more innovation in the identification of effective treatments. The inter-and intra-patient heterogeneity of GBM presents significant obstacles to effective clinical progression of novel treatments by contributing to tumour plasticity and rapid drug resistance that confounds contemporary target directed drug discovery strategies. Phenotypic drug screening is ideally suited to heterogeneous diseases, where targeting specific oncogenic drivers have been broadly ineffective. Our hypothesis is that a modern phenotypic led approach using disease relevant patient derived GBM stem cell systems will be the most productive approach to identifying new therapeutic targets, drug classes and future drug combinations that target the heterogeneity of GBM. In this study we incorporate a panel of patient derived GBM stem cell lines into an automated and unbiased Cell Painting assay to quantify multiple GBM stem cell phenotypes. By screening several compound libraries at multiple concentrations across a panel of patient-derived GBM stem cells we provide the first comprehensive survey of distinct pharmacological classes and known druggable targets, including all clinically approved drug classes and oncology drug candidates upon multiple GBM stem cell phenotypes linked to cell proliferation, survival and differentiation. Our data set representing, 3866 compounds, 2.2million images and 64000 datapoints is the largest phenotypic screen carried out to date on a panel of patient-derived GBM stem cell models that we are aware off. We seek to identify agents and targets classes which engender potent activity across heterogenous GBM genotypes and phenotypes, in this study we further characterize two validated target classes, histone deacetylase inhibitors and cyclin dependent kinases that exert broad and potent effects on the phenotypic and transcriptomic profiles of GBM stem cells. Here we present all validated hit compounds and their target assignments for the GBM community to explore.

Authors: Richard J.R. Elliott, Peter Nagle, Muhammad Furqan, John C. Dawson, Aoife McCarthy, Alison F Munro, Camilla Drake, Gillian M Morrison, Michael Marand, Daniel Ebner, Steven M. Pollard, Valerie G Brunton, Margaret C Frame, Neil O. Carragher

Last Update: 2024-12-04 00:00:00

Language: English

Source URL: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.11.27.625719

Source PDF: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.11.27.625719.full.pdf

Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.

Thank you to biorxiv for use of its open access interoperability.

Similar Articles