The Behavior of Gases in Water-Filled Fractures
Examining how gases interact with water in rock fractures.
Sojwal Manoorkar, Gülce Kalyoncu Pakkaner, Hamdi Omar, Soetkin Barbaix, Dominique Ceursters, Maxime Lathinis, Stefanie Van Offenwert, Tom Bultreys
― 4 min read
Table of Contents
- Gases and Water: How They Play Together
- The Party of Gases
- The Differences in Character
- A Closer Look at Saturation Levels
- The Clashing of Forces
- Pressure and Fluctuations: The Ups and Downs
- The Intermittent Flow Mystery
- Putting the Pieces Together
- Conclusion: The Fascinating Dance of Gases
- Original Source
- Reference Links
Let’s take a peek into the world of gases and how they behave when they are mixed with water in specific spaces called fractures. Imagine these fractures as tiny tubes hidden inside rocks. Now, we will see how different gases like hydrogen, methane, and nitrogen interact with water in these special tunnels.
Gases and Water: How They Play Together
When we're looking at how gases move through water, we see something called Relative Permeability. This is just a fancy way of saying how easily gas Flows through water in these fractures. As we increase the gas flow, we find that the water starts to disappear from some spaces. The gases start to take over, and we see that gas likes to sneak into the bigger spaces while the water hangs out in the smaller ones. It's like a game of hide and seek, but the gas is winning!
The Party of Gases
In our gas party, hydrogen, methane, and nitrogen are all invited. They each have their own behavior when it comes to mingling with water. Hydrogen and methane tend to follow similar patterns, while nitrogen seems to be the superstar with better flow. When gas flows are low, hydrogen gets a bit shy and doesn’t want to invade the fractures as much as the other two. But when gas flows get higher, they all start to connect better, and you can see them having a good time together.
The Differences in Character
While hydrogen and methane are playing nice, nitrogen is like the overachiever with its very high Viscosity, which allows it to flow more freely through the fractures. So, when we look at how each gas behaves, we find that nitrogen is more dominant. You can think of it as the cool kid in school who always gets to sit at the front of the class while the others hang back.
Saturation Levels
A Closer Look atNow, let's take a look at saturation levels. This just means how wet or dry the fractures are with water and gas. When we crank up the gas flow, water levels in the fractures drop, and more gas starts to show up. We see that for hydrogen and methane, their saturation fluctuates a lot, while nitrogen maintains a steadier presence. If you think of this like a swimming pool, the level of water might drop as kids jump in and out (the gases), but nitrogen is the kid who just keeps on swimming without too much fuss.
The Clashing of Forces
When we examine how well gases push past water, we find that the design of the fracture plays a huge role. Think of it like navigating a maze. Some paths (or fractures) are wider and easier to move through, while others are narrower and trickier. This difference in path widths causes some gases to struggle while others glide through with ease.
Pressure and Fluctuations: The Ups and Downs
As gases move through fractures, we also have to think about pressure changes. When gas flows, the pressure can go up and down, leading to fluctuations. These fluctuations are like the hiccups of the system. They can happen quickly, reflecting how gases interact with water in real-time.
The Intermittent Flow Mystery
Now, here’s where it gets really interesting. Sometimes, hydrogen and methane take a break from their flow and dissolve a bit into the water. They’ll appear to disappear and then come back again, making it look like they’re playing a game of peek-a-boo. Meanwhile, nitrogen maintains a steadier flow and seems less affected by these hiccups.
Putting the Pieces Together
So, when we sum it all up, we realize these gases have their own personalities in the world of fractures. They each interact with water differently based on their properties. Hydrogen and methane might play around with the water, while nitrogen simply takes charge. Yet, all this buzzing and flowing can affect how gases move, allowing us to think about what this means in a larger context, like in natural environments or human-made systems.
Conclusion: The Fascinating Dance of Gases
In the end, the way gases like hydrogen, methane, and nitrogen mingle with water in fractures reveals a captivating story of interaction and movement. Through the ups and downs of pressure, the varying abilities to flow, and the intricate dance between water and gas, we witness a world that’s both complex and mesmerizing. So, next time you think about gases, imagine them having a party in their own unique way, all while navigating through hidden tunnels in the rock. Who knew science could be this much fun?
Title: From underground natural gas to hydrogen storage in fractured reservoir rock : comparing relative permeabilities for hydrogen versus methane and nitrogen
Abstract: Underground hydrogen storage in saline aquifers is a potential solution for seasonal renewable energy storage. Among potential storage sites, facilities used for underground natural gas storage have advantages, including well-characterized cyclical injection-withdrawal behavior and partially reusable infrastructure. However, the differences between hydrogen-brine and natural gas-brine flow, particularly through fractures in the reservoir and the sealing caprock, remain unclear due to the complexity of two-phase flow. Therefore, we investigate fracture relative permeability for hydrogen versus methane (natural gas) and nitrogen (commonly used in laboratories). Steady-state relative permeability experiments were conducted at 10 MPa on fractured carbonate rock from the Loenhout natural gas storage in Belgium, where gas flows through {\textmu}m-to-mm scale fractures. Our results reveal that the hydrogen exhibits similar relative permeability curves to methane, but both are significantly lower than those measured for nitrogen. This implies that nitrogen cannot reliably serve as a proxy for hydrogen at typical reservoir pressures. The low relative permeabilities for hydrogen and methane indicate strong fluid phase interference, which traditional relative permeability models fail to capture. This is supported by our observation of periodic pressure fluctuations associated with intermittent fluid connectivity for hydrogen and methane. In conclusion, our findings suggest that the fundamental flow properties of fractured rocks are complex but relatively similar for hydrogen and natural gas. This is an important insight for predictive modeling of the conversion of Loenhout and similar natural gas storage facilities, which is crucial to evaluate their hydrogen storage efficiency and integrity.
Authors: Sojwal Manoorkar, Gülce Kalyoncu Pakkaner, Hamdi Omar, Soetkin Barbaix, Dominique Ceursters, Maxime Lathinis, Stefanie Van Offenwert, Tom Bultreys
Last Update: 2024-11-21 00:00:00
Language: English
Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.14122
Source PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2411.14122
Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.
Thank you to arxiv for use of its open access interoperability.