Simple Science

Cutting edge science explained simply

# Biology # Neuroscience

The Science of Saccadic Reaction Time

Discover how your eyes react to visual stimuli.

Yufeng Zhang, Pascal Fries

― 7 min read


Saccadic Reaction Time Saccadic Reaction Time Explained visual processing. Eye movements reveal insights into
Table of Contents

When you spot something interesting, your eyes quickly dart to it. This rapid movement of the eyes, called a saccade, helps us focus on what matters. But did you know that how quickly your eyes respond to a target can change based on where that target is? This response time is called Saccadic Reaction Time (SRT). This article will break down the fascinating world of SRT and how it's influenced by various factors, such as the position of the target and the lighting conditions.

What are Saccades?

Saccades are quick, simultaneous movements of both eyes that are essential for grabbing visual information about our surroundings. Imagine you’re at a party, and someone waves at you from across the room. Your eyes quickly shift to that person, allowing you to see them clearly. This action happens almost without you thinking about it.

We make several of these movements every second, but not all saccades are created equal. Sometimes our eyes move quickly, and sometimes they take their sweet time.

What is Saccadic Reaction Time?

Saccadic Reaction Time is the time it takes for your brain to recognize a new target and send signals to your eyes to move toward it. It’s like a race between your brain and your eyes. The clock starts when you see something new and stops when your eyes land on it. If you’re gazing at something close, you might react instantly. But if you need to gaze farther away, it may take a little longer.

Influencing Factors: Size and Distance

One major factor that influences SRT is the size of the saccade. Interestingly, there’s a specific pattern to how SRT changes with target size. For very small movements (less than one degree) or very large ones (more than ten degrees), SRT tends to be longer. But for medium-sized movements, like those between two and ten degrees, the reaction time is significantly shorter. Think of it as the Goldilocks principle: not too big, not too small-just right!

The Role of Target Eccentricity

Target eccentricity refers to how far a target is from where you’re currently looking. When we talk about the effects of target size or eccentricity on SRT, we spotlight a curious phenomenon. If you’re trying to spot a target that’s slightly off to the side, it generally takes you longer to react than if it were straight ahead. The time delay is especially noticeable when it comes to medium-sized saccades since these are the ones we make most often, both in daily life and scientific studies.

Past Research and Challenges

Earlier studies that looked into SRT often involved tasks where a dot appeared in your peripheral vision. This approach isn’t without problems, though. For instance, when targets are identical in physical size but are located at different distances, their visibility can vary. Because our brain tends to enhance the view of whatever is close to us (thanks, foveal magnification!), the same-sized dot might be harder to see when it’s farther away, affecting our SRT.

Another obstacle in previous research has been the lighting conditions. If the background is too dim, it can make the dot too striking, giving you a quick reaction but not truly reflecting the target's influence on your eyes’ movements.

Task Structure: Exogenous vs. Endogenous Saccades

The way we set up tasks to measure SRT can also impact the results. Two types of tasks used are exogenous and endogenous saccades.

  • Exogenous Saccades: These are driven by the sudden appearance of a target, like a loud noise prompting you to look. They typically lead to faster reactions since your eyes are almost jumping at the new visual stimulus.

  • Endogenous Saccades: In these tasks, the movement happens after a delay, triggered by a previous cue. For instance, you may be asked to keep your eyes fixed on a dot, and only when it disappears do you shift your gaze to the target. This process is a little slower since your brain prepares for movement after the “go” signal.

Different Patterns of SRT

Studies have shown that the patterns of SRT in these two types of tasks differ in interesting ways. In the exogenous tasks, SRT usually increases as the target moves farther away, while in the delayed tasks, this trend may be less obvious. This discrepancy shows how attentional control plays a part. If a target is farther away, your brain may need to work harder to shift attention and control that eye movement.

Experimental Approach and Methods

To investigate these ideas, researchers have focused on studying monkeys as they offer valuable insights into visual processing similar to humans. Two different sets of stimuli were used for the targets, one with equal sizes and another that was adjusted based on how our eyes magnify images at different distances.

The Experiment

During the experiment, monkeys were trained to make saccades toward these targets in different conditions. Researchers carefully controlled the background lighting and the timing of when targets appeared. Each monkey was tested multiple times under each scenario, allowing for reliable data collection.

Findings on SRT and Scaling

The essential takeaway from the studies is that scaling the size of the stimuli influenced the SRT. When the size was adjusted to account for the visual processing effects, it effectively reduced SRT, especially for targets with lower contrast. This observation makes sense-when the target is easier to see, we can react faster!

The Contrast Factor

Interestingly, increasing the brightness or contrast of a target also plays a significant role in how quickly we react. The brighter and more distinct a target is, the quicker our brain can process it and send the command to our eyes to move. This means that, during tasks where contrast varies, our SRT also changes accordingly.

The Influence of Attention

One major insight from the findings was the effect of attention on SRT. In tasks where monkeys had to wait for a specific signal before moving their eyes, attentional shifts became crucial. When the fixation point disappeared, the monkeys had to move their attention from that dot to the target. This shift, especially when targets were farther away, can cause delays, resulting in longer SRTs.

The Flash Test

In additional trials, a sudden flash at the center of the visual field was introduced. The idea was to see if this would capture the monkeys' attention and affect their reaction times. It turned out that this flash created a clear delay, as it temporarily diverted their attention back to the center.

Conclusion

Saccadic Reaction Time is a complex but fascinating aspect of how we visually interact with our surroundings. Understanding it helps reveal a lot about our cognitive processes and how attention works. The length of time it takes to shift our gaze can depend on several factors, including size, distance, background contrast, and whether our attention needs to shift from one point to another.

Next time you catch a glimpse of something out of the corner of your eye and find yourself darting your eyes toward it, remember, there’s a lot more going on behind the scenes than you might have thought. Your brain and eyes are in a constant interplay of signaling, responding, and adapting to new information-faster than a speeding bullet!

So, always be ready for those quick glances and those moments when your eyes need to play catch-up! You never know when the next interesting sight will catch your attention and spark a new adventure-or at least a good story to share!

Original Source

Title: Eccentricity-Dependent Saccadic Reaction Time: The Roles of Foveal Magnification and Attentional Orienting

Abstract: A hallmark of primate vision is the emphasis on foveal processing, accompanied by frequent saccades that bring the fovea to salient parts of the scene, or to newly appearing stimuli. A saccade to a new stimulus is one of the most fundamental sensory-motor transformations. In macaque monkeys, we show that foveal magnification is not only the reason for saccades, but it also affects the dynamics of saccade initiation. In a task where the monkeys made saccades to peripheral target onsets, saccadic reaction time (SRT) increased with target eccentricity. Notably, we effectively eliminated this increase by scaling the target size according to the foveal magnification factor in the superior colliculus. We repeated the comparison between non-scaled and scaled targets, while changing the task to a delayed saccade task. In this task, the target was presented long before the saccade, and the saccade was triggered by foveal fixation offset rather than target onset, such that target onset long before fixation offset was essentially irrelevant for SRT. In this task, we found that SRT increased with target eccentricity, with similar rate for both non-scaled and scaled targets. Furthermore, this increase survived the addition of a salient distracting flash resetting attention to the foveal. The results obtained with the delayed saccades task are consistent with an attentional scan from the fovea to the target, a recently hypothesized general mechanism of attention.

Authors: Yufeng Zhang, Pascal Fries

Last Update: 2024-12-06 00:00:00

Language: English

Source URL: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.08.08.552339

Source PDF: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.08.08.552339.full.pdf

Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.

Thank you to biorxiv for use of its open access interoperability.

More from authors

Similar Articles