Simple Science

Cutting edge science explained simply

# Biology # Cancer Biology

Invasive Lobular Carcinoma: A Closer Look

Understanding the unique challenges of Invasive Lobular Carcinoma in breast cancer.

Joseph L. Sottnik, Madeleine T. Shackleford, Camryn S. Nesiba, Amanda L. Richer, Jordan M. Swartz, Carmen E. Rowland, Maggie Musick, Rui Fu, Patricia L. Opresko, Sanjana Mehrotra, Jay R. Hesselberth, Jennifer R. Diamond, Matthew J. Sikora

― 6 min read


Invasive Lobular Invasive Lobular Carcinoma Revealed Lobular Carcinoma treatment strategies. Examining the complexities of Invasive
Table of Contents

Invasive Lobular Carcinoma (ILC) is a unique type of breast cancer that emerges from the lobules, which are the milk-producing glands in the breast. Unlike the more common invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), which tends to form solid masses, ILC grows in a distinctive pattern, often described as a "single-file" formation. This means that the cancer cells creep through the tissues in a sneaky manner, rather than pushing their way through like a bulldozer.

Why is ILC Different?

ILC is not just different in how it grows; it also has unique characteristics at the molecular level. For instance, about 95% of ILC cases are estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, meaning they rely on the hormone estrogen to grow. This is a bit like having a pet that only eats a specific type of food; you have to keep that in stock to keep it happy and growing. Additionally, many ILC tumors are classified as Luminal A, a subtype that typically has a better prognosis than other types of breast cancer.

However, here's the kicker: even with these “low-risk” markers, ILC tends to come back more often than IDC. Studies show that the recurrence rate increases significantly, regardless of whether the cancer cells are ER-positive or not. Moreover, ILC has a reputation for spreading to unusual places in the body, such as the gastrointestinal tract and even the brain, which can complicate treatment.

The Importance of Better Treatments

Given these challenges, ILC patients often face a tough treatment landscape. While anti-estrogen therapies, like Tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors, can be effective, there's some debate about how well they work for ILC compared to IDC. Additionally, chemotherapy often provides limited benefits for ILC patients, further complicating treatment strategies. There's an urgent need for new therapies that specifically target the unique biology of ILC.

MDC1: A Key Player

One of the proteins that have garnered interest in ILC research is Mediator of DNA Damage Checkpoint 1 (MDC1). This protein has been identified as a crucial co-regulator of ER activity in ILC cells. In simpler terms, imagine MDC1 as a helper that allows the "pet" (cancer cells) to eat (grow) better by responding to estrogen. However, MDC1 doesn't have any known “cookbook” for doing this; its exact methods remain a mystery.

MDC1 usually serves a dual purpose: it helps fix DNA damage and regulates the signaling mechanisms that control the cell cycle. But in ILC, it appears to lose some of its DNA Repair functions, which raises questions about how this weaves into the fabric of ILC's biology.

The DNA Repair Puzzle

When it comes to DNA repair, most ILC tumors don't exhibit the common signs of DNA repair deficiencies, such as mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes. These mutations are a significant driver of breast cancer and are often linked with a greater likelihood of DNA repair issues. Surprisingly, only a small percentage of ILC cases harbor mutations in these genes.

ILC is generally seen as having "quiet" genomes, but interestingly, some studies suggest that a subset of ILC tumors may show signs of elevated DNA damage response characteristics. It's almost like ILC is hiding its true nature behind a friendly facade, while still being a bit more chaotic underneath.

The Role of PARP Inhibitors

We've established that ILC has its quirks, but recent findings show that it could potentially be sensitive to a class of treatment known as PARP inhibitors. These drugs work by exploiting the weaknesses in cancer cell DNA repair mechanisms, similar to how a thief might take advantage of a weak lock to gain entry. With ILC showing signs of DNA repair dysfunction, there's a glimmer of hope that PARP inhibitors, like talazoparib, could effectively target this type of cancer.

In laboratory tests, ILC cell lines have shown a surprising sensitivity to talazoparib. This is like discovering that your favorite restaurant has a secret menu item you never knew existed! When tested in animal models, talazoparib not only slowed tumor growth but did so in a way that was more effective than traditional anti-estrogen therapies.

Understanding the Connections

To further investigate these connections, researchers have been profiling the interactions of MDC1 in ILC cells. By using advanced techniques like mass spectrometry, scientists hope to paint a clearer picture of how MDC1 collaborates with various proteins involved in both estrogen signaling and DNA repair. Imagine putting together a jigsaw puzzle without the box lid; you have to figure out how all these pieces fit together to see the complete image.

Researchers have also looked at single-cell profiles to get a better understanding of how certain genes behave in response to estrogen and DNA repair processes. These studies reveal that ILC cells operate differently than IDC cells, particularly in how they handle DNA damage and repair.

The Big Picture: ILC vs IDC

When comparing ILC to IDC, the differences become even more apparent. IDC cells show a robust DNA repair response, including efficient turnover of RAD51, a protein crucial for fixing DNA. ILC cells, on the other hand, often struggle with this process, suggesting they may have a unique form of dysfunction when it comes to DNA repair.

This complexity hints at a possible link between the biology of ILC, its unique DNA damage response, and its sensitivity to treatments like PARP inhibitors. It raises more questions than answers: How can a cancer type rely on a “helper” like MDC1 for growth while simultaneously having issues with DNA repair? And can targeting this dysfunction lead to more effective treatments?

The Need for Clinical Trials

Given the promising results from laboratory studies, there's an urgent need for clinical trials focusing on the ILC population. While many breast cancer studies do not always clearly categorize tumor types, recent initiatives have aimed to specifically enroll patients with ILC. This targeted approach can help researchers gather valuable data to tailor treatments better suited for this unique cancer type.

Conclusion: Toward Better Strategies

ILC presents a distinct challenge in the world of breast cancer, but with ongoing research and a better understanding of its unique biology, the hope for more effective therapies is on the horizon. With a focus on unearthing the truths of ILC's DNA repair dysfunction and the role of proteins like MDC1, the medical community is poised to make strides in improving outcomes for patients facing this complex form of breast cancer.

Whether through innovative drug development or targeted clinical trials, the future looks promising. Just remember, even if the path is tricky, researchers are working diligently to find the best routes, so the "pet" doesn't have to just rely on the same old food every day!

Original Source

Title: Co-regulator activity of Mediator of DNA Damage Checkpoint 1 (MDC1) is associated with DNA repair dysfunction and PARP inhibitor sensitivity in lobular carcinoma of the breast

Abstract: Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast (ILC) are typically estrogen receptor (ER)-positive and present with biomarkers of anti-estrogen sensitive disease, yet patients with ILC face uniquely poor long-term outcomes with increased recurrence risk, suggesting endocrine response and ER function are unique in ILC. We previously found specifically in ILC cells that ER is co-regulated by the DNA repair protein Mediator of DNA Damage Checkpoint 1 (MDC1). This novel MDC1 activity, however, was associated with dysfunction in the canonical DNA repair activity of MDC1, but absent typical features of DNA repair deficiency. To understand reciprocal activities of MDC1, we profiled the MDC1 interactome and found MDC1-associated proteins in ILC cells mirror a "BRCA-like" state lacking key homologous recombination (HR) proteins, consistent with HR dysfunction but distinct from classic "BRCAness". HR dysfunction in ILC cells was mirrored in single-cell transcriptome and DNA repair activity analyses, along with DNA repair signaling and functional data, showing dysfunctional HR induction and resolution. In parallel, ILC tumor data are consistent with a distinct form of HR dysfunction via impaired HR resolution, lacking BRCA-like genomic scarring but with elevated signatures of PARP inhibitor sensitivity. We tested whether this HR dysfunction could indeed be exploited using PARP inhibition and found that talazoparib treatment produced a durable growth suppression in vitro and in multiple ILC xenografts in vivo. ILC-specific ER:MDC1 activity creates a new context for ER and MDC1 function in ILC, at the cost of a DNA repair dysfunction that is therapeutically targetable. SignificanceILC are rarely associated with biomarkers of HR deficiency, and as such patients are rarely eligible for treatment with PARP inhibitors. Our work suggests ILC present with a previously unappreciated form of HR dysfunction, linked to ILC-specific genomic activity of ER and MDC1, which imparts sensitivity to PARP inhibition.

Authors: Joseph L. Sottnik, Madeleine T. Shackleford, Camryn S. Nesiba, Amanda L. Richer, Jordan M. Swartz, Carmen E. Rowland, Maggie Musick, Rui Fu, Patricia L. Opresko, Sanjana Mehrotra, Jay R. Hesselberth, Jennifer R. Diamond, Matthew J. Sikora

Last Update: 2024-12-06 00:00:00

Language: English

Source URL: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.10.29.564555

Source PDF: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.10.29.564555.full.pdf

Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.

Thank you to biorxiv for use of its open access interoperability.

Similar Articles