Simple Science

Cutting edge science explained simply

# Biology # Neuroscience

Neurons: The Brain's Communication Network

Discover how neurons communicate and the challenges of studying their activity.

Steeve Laquitaine, Milo Imbeni, Joseph Tharayil, James B. Isbister, Michael W. Reimann

― 5 min read


Decoding Neuron Decoding Neuron Communication activity and spike sorting. Uncovering the complexities of neuronal
Table of Contents

Neurons are the basic building blocks of the brain and the nervous system. They are like tiny messengers that send and receive signals throughout the body. Each neuron communicates with other neurons by sending out electrical signals called spikes. Think of these spikes as little text messages that neurons send to one another to share information and keep the body functioning.

How Do Neurons Communicate?

Neurons communicate by releasing spikes in a pattern. These spikes can be recorded using special tools called electrodes that are placed near the neurons. Each neuron has a unique spike shape and size, which helps scientists identify them. When many neurons work together, they form groups called neuronal ensembles, which are responsible for complex brain functions.

The Rise of Technology in Neuroscience

Thanks to advancements in technology, scientists can now record the activity of many neurons simultaneously. Specialized electrodes can capture the spikes of hundreds of neurons at once, making it easier to study how they work together. However, there’s a catch: sorting through all this data to find specific neurons and their Activities can be tricky!

The Challenge of Spike Sorting

Spike sorting is the process of identifying which spikes come from which neuron. When many neurons are active close to each other, their signals can overlap. This phenomenon is known as spike collision. Imagine trying to listen to multiple friends talking at once-all you get is a jumble of voices!

Researchers have developed computer programs to help with spike sorting by recognizing patterns in the spikes. These programs are crucial for understanding how neurons work together, but they’re not perfect.

New Tools for Spike Sorting

Newer spike-sorting algorithms have shown a lot of promise. One of the most popular ones is called Kilosort, which uses advanced techniques to detect spikes and separate them into different neurons. However, even with these new tools, researchers often find that they can only identify a fraction of the neurons they expect to detect based on their theoretical calculations.

Why Are There So Many Missed Neurons?

Researchers suspect that several factors contribute to the problem of missed neurons. The first reason is that some neurons simply don’t send out enough spikes. If a neuron is a shy communicator, it’s harder to catch its messages among all the noise.

Another factor is the physical structure of the neuron. Neurons with more complex shapes might create spikes that are harder to distinguish from others. It’s like trying to spot a tiny yellow bird in a tree full of colorful parrots and squirrels.

Making Sense of the Numbers

In studies using advanced electrodes, scientists expect to identify around 800 to 1800 neurons. However, they often find themselves landing at only about 200 active neurons. This means that many neurons, especially those in deeper layers of the cortex, are overlooked.

It’s like going to a buffet and only tasting the desserts while leaving the rest of the delicious dishes untried.

Improving Spike Sorting Algorithms

Researchers have been working on simulating the activity of neurons in a model that reflects the real brain's complexity. They’ve created models that include a variety of neuron types with realistic connections, allowing for a detailed look at how spikes are generated and detected.

These models help scientists evaluate and improve the spike-sorting algorithms. By comparing the performance of these algorithms against the model’s predictions, researchers can tweak them for better accuracy.

The Results: Biases in Spike Sorting

One of the more surprising findings is that many spike-sorting algorithms tend to favor certain types of neurons over others. For example, they might pick up on more active excitatory neurons (the ones that send messages) while overlooking others, such as inhibiting neurons (those that help regulate excitement). This bias can impact overall data quality.

Imagine a school that always picks the most outgoing student for the talent show, ignoring the shy but talented kids in the back.

The Importance of Ground Truth Data

Ground truth data is the actual activity of neurons which serves as a solid reference for evaluating the performance of spike sorting algorithms. Having this data allows researchers to assess how well their algorithms are doing at identifying individual neuron activity.

It’s like having a key to the treasure chest where all the good stuff is hidden. Without it, you’re left guessing.

Conclusion: The Journey Ahead

The study of neurons and their communication is an ongoing adventure. Researchers are continuously learning more about how to effectively isolate and understand the activity of individual neurons in the complex landscape of the brain.

With improvements in technology and modeling techniques, they are hopeful that they can make significant strides in this field. The goal is to paint a clearer picture of how our brains work, leading to a better understanding of everything from behavior to potential diseases.

So, next time you think about your brain, just remember: it’s not just a mass of cells, but a bustling city of signals, messages, and connections, all working together to make you who you are. And like any good city, sometimes the little ninjas (neurons) working in the background deserve a little more attention!

Original Source

Title: Spike sorting biases and information loss in a detailed cortical model

Abstract: Sorting electrical signals (spikes) from extracellular recordings of large groups of connected neurons is essential to understanding brain function. Despite transformative advances in dense extracellular recordings, the activity of most cortical neurons remains undetected. Small simulations with known neuron spike times offer critical ground truth data to improve spike sorting. Yet, current simulations underestimate neuronal heterogeneity and connectivity, which can potentially make spike sorting more challenging. We simulated recordings in a detailed large-scale cortical microcircuit model to link spike sorting accuracy to neuronal heterogeneity, evaluate the performance of state-of-the-art spike sorters and examine how spike sorting impacts the retrieval of information encoded in the cortical circuit. We found that modern spike sorters accurately isolated about 15% of neurons within 50 {micro}m of the electrode shank, which contrasts with previous simulated yields but agrees with experiments. Neurons were unresolved because their spike trains were either missed (undersampling) or, when detected, incomplete or merged with other units (assignment biases). Neuron isolation quality was influenced by both anatomical and physiological factors (selection bias), improving with increased neuron firing rate, spike spatial extent, for neurons in layer 5, and excitatory neurons. We exposed the network to various stimuli to dissociate the impact of these biases on its stimulus discrimination ability. Surprisingly, undersampling did not affect discrimination capacity, but selection and assignment biases nearly reduced it by half. These findings posit realistic models as a complementary method to evaluate and improve spike sorting and, hence, brain activity representations.

Authors: Steeve Laquitaine, Milo Imbeni, Joseph Tharayil, James B. Isbister, Michael W. Reimann

Last Update: 2024-12-07 00:00:00

Language: English

Source URL: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.12.04.626805

Source PDF: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.12.04.626805.full.pdf

Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.

Thank you to biorxiv for use of its open access interoperability.

More from authors

Similar Articles