Simple Science

Cutting edge science explained simply

# Computer Science # Human-Computer Interaction # Artificial Intelligence

Bridging the Gap: Communicating with AI Agents

Effective communication is key to improving interactions with AI agents.

Gagan Bansal, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan, Saleema Amershi, Eric Horvitz, Adam Fourney, Hussein Mozannar, Victor Dibia, Daniel S. Weld

― 7 min read


AI Communication AI Communication Challenges agents. Navigating communication issues with AI
Table of Contents

As we move towards a future where artificial intelligence (AI) agents are becoming more common, we are faced with new challenges in how humans and these agents communicate. These challenges come from the agents' complex designs and capabilities that allow them to perform tasks in ways that can sometimes be unexpected. To better understand these issues, we can break them down into three broad groups: what agents need to tell users, what users need to tell agents, and the general awkwardness that can happen when humans and agents try to get on the same page.

The Rise of Sophisticated Agents

Today’s AI agents are smarter than ever. They can analyze their surroundings, use various tools, and talk to each other to tackle problems. Although they can communicate in natural language, their advanced nature can create confusion for users. When users interact with these agents, understanding how they operate may not always be clear, leading to problems in communication.

These agents can do things like manage calendars, book travel, or even order food, which can have a big impact on our daily lives. However, because they are capable of making decisions and taking actions that carry some risks, it is important that users know what the agents can and cannot do. If a user misjudges an agent's abilities, it can lead to costly mistakes.

Categories of Communication Challenges

Agent-to-User Communication

This category focuses on how agents communicate necessary information to users. Here are some specific challenges:

1. What Can the Agent Do?

Users may not fully understand what an agent is capable of. If a user asks an agent to complete a task, they need to know upfront what the agent can actually do. Without clear understanding, users might expect outcomes that the agent simply cannot deliver, leading to miscommunication and annoyance.

For example, if a user gives an agent a task to gather data, but the agent only works with certain kinds of data and cannot access others, the user will be left frustrated when they receive incomplete information. Think of it as asking a librarian who only knows about cookbooks to find you a book on rocket science.

2. What Is the Agent About to Do?

Before acting, an agent should inform the user about its intended actions, especially if these actions are significant. If an agent goes ahead and takes expensive or irreversible actions without consulting the user, it can lead to disasters.

Imagine an agent tasked with cleaning a garage. If it decides without asking to recycle a container marked "old Christmas decorations," the user may find their favorite holiday ornaments in the recycling bin. Communication is key here to prevent misunderstandings.

3. What Is the Agent Currently Doing?

While an agent is executing tasks, users want to be aware of what is happening at any given moment. If the user cannot monitor the agent's ongoing actions, they may lose control over the situation.

For instance, if an agent is supposed to book a hotel but unexpectedly starts signing the user up for a newsletter, the user might be taken aback. Users should be able to intervene or adjust the agent's activities as needed.

4. Were There Any Side Effects or Changes?

Agents may inadvertently cause changes in the environment as they perform tasks. Users need to be informed about significant changes or unexpected actions taken by the agent.

Let’s say the agent handles a user’s finances and decides to open a new credit card for better rewards without consulting the user. This might not sit well with the user when they discover it happened after the fact.

5. Was the Goal Achieved?

After an agent completes a task, users want to know whether the agent successfully reached the goal. If a user asks an agent to write a report, they should be able to verify that the agent did this correctly without major flaws.

For example, if an agent writes a report but includes incorrect data, the user shouldn't have to guess whether it did a good job. They need to be able to check easily if the agent met their instructions.

User-to-Agent Communication

Users also need to effectively communicate their needs and expectations to agents. Here are some of the challenges in this area:

U1: What Should the Agent Achieve?

When users task an agent, they need to clearly express their goals. If the agent misunderstands these goals, it could lead to undesirable results.

For example, if a user asks the agent to plan a business trip but the agent thinks it’s a vacation, the user might end up with a holiday itinerary full of sightseeing tours instead of meetings. Clear communication of goals is vital to avoid such mix-ups.

U2: What Preferences Should the Agent Respect?

Users have specific preferences for how they want tasks completed. Agents need to grasp these preferences effectively, but this can be tough, especially if they differ from typical expectations.

If a user instructs an agent to avoid certain types of restaurants while ordering food, but the agent doesn't understand the nuances of what is considered acceptable, it could lead to an embarrassing dinner. Ensuring the agent respects these subtle choices is important.

U3: What Should the Agent Do Differently Next Time?

Feedback is crucial for agents to improve their performance over time. Users must be able to provide feedback on the agent's actions to help it learn what works and what does not.

Let’s say a user instructs an agent to handle their emails. If the agent misfiles important messages, the user should easily correct it, so the agent does better in the future. Otherwise, the agent may continue making the same mistake.

General Communication Issues

There are also overarching challenges that can disrupt communication between humans and agents regardless of the specific techniques being used. Here are some of them:

X1: How Should the Agent Help the User Verify Its Behavior?

Because modern agents can make mistakes, users should have mechanisms in place to verify the agent's actions. If, for example, the agent is believed to have executed a task well, but it made an error, the user should be able to communicate or check to ensure everything corresponds to what was intended.

X2: How Should the Agent Convey Consistent Behavior?

Users need to trust that agents behave consistently. If an agent delivers different results for the same task, it can lead to confusion and doubt.

Suppose the agent writes a summary of a document. If one day it's concise and clear while another day it’s long-winded and unclear, the user might start wondering if the agent is having an off day. Consistency builds trust.

X3: How Should the Agent Choose an Appropriate Level of Detail?

Finding the right balance of detail in communication is tricky. Too much information can overwhelm the user, while too little can leave them confused.

If an agent is constantly bombarding the user with information about every step, it can lead to frustration. Users often prefer a streamlined approach that focuses on key actions and decisions.

X4: Which Past Interactions Should the Agent Consider When Communicating?

Agents can have complex histories with users, and knowing which past interactions to reference can be confusing. This information helps agents avoid repeating mistakes or referencing irrelevant details.

For instance, if an agent previously planned a trip to Paris for a user, it might need to remember that the user prefers art museums when suggesting activities. Knowing how to draw on that information effectively is crucial.

Conclusion

As we delve deeper into using AI agents in our day-to-day lives, the importance of clear and effective communication cannot be overstated. Establishing common ground between humans and agents is critical to ensure that both parties are aligned in their expectations and actions.

While we are experiencing growing pains in human-agent interaction, these challenges present not just obstacles, but also opportunities for improvement in how we design and implement these systems. By focusing on transparency, clarity, and understanding, we can pave the way for a future where AI agents serve as valuable partners in our lives.

Original Source

Title: Challenges in Human-Agent Communication

Abstract: Remarkable advancements in modern generative foundation models have enabled the development of sophisticated and highly capable autonomous agents that can observe their environment, invoke tools, and communicate with other agents to solve problems. Although such agents can communicate with users through natural language, their complexity and wide-ranging failure modes present novel challenges for human-AI interaction. Building on prior research and informed by a communication grounding perspective, we contribute to the study of \emph{human-agent communication} by identifying and analyzing twelve key communication challenges that these systems pose. These include challenges in conveying information from the agent to the user, challenges in enabling the user to convey information to the agent, and overarching challenges that need to be considered across all human-agent communication. We illustrate each challenge through concrete examples and identify open directions of research. Our findings provide insights into critical gaps in human-agent communication research and serve as an urgent call for new design patterns, principles, and guidelines to support transparency and control in these systems.

Authors: Gagan Bansal, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan, Saleema Amershi, Eric Horvitz, Adam Fourney, Hussein Mozannar, Victor Dibia, Daniel S. Weld

Last Update: Nov 27, 2024

Language: English

Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.10380

Source PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.10380

Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.

Thank you to arxiv for use of its open access interoperability.

Similar Articles