Optimizing Two-Sided Markets for Better Matches
A look into improving connections between service providers and customers.
Dan Nissim, Danny Segev, Alfredo Torrico
― 5 min read
Table of Contents
In today's world, many of us rely on apps like Uber, Airbnb, and LinkedIn for services such as rides, places to stay, and job searching. These platforms connect two groups: service providers (like drivers or hosts) and customers (the people looking for a ride or a place to stay). This connection is what we refer to as a two-sided market.
These markets are getting bigger and bigger, with billions of people using them. As a result, businesses have been trying to find ways to make these platforms work better for both customers and service providers. This means making sure customers are happy, making more money, and gaining a larger share of the market.
Two-sided Markets
Background onTwo-sided markets have become a crucial part of our daily lives. They have made it easier for service providers to find customers and vice versa. This has led to a significant transformation in how these services are offered and accessed.
With the rapid growth of these markets, researchers are investigating how to improve the experience for users and the profitability for businesses. They are working on new models and methods to help platforms manage their revenue better.
Matching Markets
The Basics ofTwo-sided matching markets can be illustrated using a simple model: think of it as a graph. On one side, we have customers, and on the other side, we have suppliers. Each customer has a set of suppliers they can choose from, and each supplier has their own set of customers. The goal is to create matches between customers and suppliers that benefit everyone involved.
Customers pick suppliers, and suppliers decide whether to accept those customers. A match is successful if both the customer and the supplier agree on it. The challenge for platforms is to create the right mix of options so that matches happen as frequently as possible.
Different Models
There are two main ways to look at these matching markets: the inclusive model and the Customized Model.
Inclusive Model
In the inclusive model, every supplier can see all the customers who have chosen them. This means that there’s no filtering; all options are presented to suppliers. The idea here is to maximize the number of matches by allowing suppliers to see all their potential customers.
Customized Model
In the customized model, the platform can filter which customers are shown to each supplier. This allows for a more personalized experience where suppliers only get to see customers that match their profiles and preferences. The goal is to enhance the potential for successful matches by tailoring the offers.
The Revenue Challenge
One of the biggest challenges in these markets is maximizing revenue. Platforms want to create the best possible combination of customers and suppliers to increase earnings. This involves making smart choices about which suppliers to show to which customers and how to present those options.
The interesting part is that the rewards for these matches can vary based on many factors. Each customer-supplier pair can have its own unique value, making the decision-making process more complicated.
Objectives of Revenue Maximization
The main goal for the platforms is to come up with a menu, or a selection of options, that maximizes expected revenue. This means that they want to find the right balance between the number of matches and the value of those matches.
To achieve this, they need to carefully analyze customer preferences and supplier offerings. They must create menus that appeal to customers while also being profitable for suppliers.
Previous Work
Research has been done on optimizing these two-sided markets in the past. Some studies focused on maximizing the number of matches, while others looked at the quality of those matches. As the models became more complex, researchers began to explore various methods to create better revenue opportunities.
Most of the earlier work focused on simpler models where rewards were uniform. However, as more realistic scenarios were examined, researchers recognized the need to consider pairwise rewards, where each customer-supplier pair can have a different value.
The Importance of Pairwise Rewards
Pairwise rewards add a layer of complexity to the decision-making process. Instead of treating all matches the same, platforms need to evaluate the potential value of each match individually. This requires more sophisticated models that take into account the different preferences and values involved.
The challenge lies in the fact that creating these models is not straightforward. Traditional methods that rely on certain mathematical properties don’t always apply in this context, leading to difficulties in deriving effective algorithms.
Proposed Solutions
The current approach focuses on developing constant-factor approximation guarantees for revenue maximization in these two-sided markets. By leveraging new mathematical tools and ideas, researchers aim to overcome the limitations posed by pairwise rewards.
These solutions involve creating novel linear relaxations that simplify the problem while maintaining the essential aspects of the original model. By carefully crafting these approximations, it's possible to find effective ways to maximize revenue without having to evaluate every possible scenario.
The Role of Algorithms
Algorithms play a crucial role in finding the best menus for different customer-supplier pairs. These algorithms are designed to process the data in a way that identifies the most profitable matches while considering the individual preferences of customers and suppliers.
By applying these algorithms, platforms can make better decisions that lead to more successful matches and higher revenue. This is where the magic happens – transforming complex data into actionable insights.
Conclusion
As we move forward in the realm of two-sided markets, the focus on revenue maximization will only grow. By creating smarter models and utilizing advanced algorithms, platforms can improve both customer satisfaction and profitability. The journey toward optimizing these markets is an exciting one, filled with challenges and opportunities, and it continues to evolve as our understanding deepens.
That's a wrap on the science of matching markets. Think of it like a dating app but for suppliers and customers – trying to find the perfect match while making sure everyone feels great about their choice!
Title: Revenue Maximization in Choice-Based Matching Markets
Abstract: The primary contribution of this paper resides in devising constant-factor approximation guarantees for revenue maximization in two-sided matching markets, under general pairwise rewards. A major distinction between our work and state-of-the-art results in this context (Ashlagi et al., 2022; Torrico et al., 2023) is that, for the first time, we are able to address reward maximization, reflected by assigning each customer-supplier pair an arbitrarily-valued reward. The specific type of performance guarantees we attain depends on whether one considers the customized model or the inclusive model. The fundamental difference between these settings lies in whether the platform should display to each supplier all selecting customers, as in the inclusive model, or whether the platform can further personalize this set, as in the customized model. Technically speaking, our algorithmic approach and its analysis revolve around presenting novel linear relaxations, leveraging convex stochastic orders, employing approximate dynamic programming, and developing tailor-made analytical ideas. In both models considered, these ingredients allow us to overcome the lack of submodularity and subadditivity that stems from pairwise rewards, plaguing the applicability of existing methods.
Authors: Dan Nissim, Danny Segev, Alfredo Torrico
Last Update: 2024-11-24 00:00:00
Language: English
Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.15727
Source PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2411.15727
Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.
Thank you to arxiv for use of its open access interoperability.