Simple Science

Cutting edge science explained simply

# Physics # Astrophysics of Galaxies # Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics # General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology

Testing Dark Matter vs. Modified Gravity in Disc Galaxies

A study on how disc galaxies reveal truths about dark matter and MOND.

Christopher Harvey-Hawes, Marco Galoppo

― 6 min read


Disc Galaxies: MOND vs Disc Galaxies: MOND vs Dark Matter theories using disc galaxies. New findings challenge dark matter
Table of Contents

Disc Galaxies are fascinating places. They swirl around like a spinning pizza, with stars, gas, and dust all mixed together. Scientists are always looking for new ways to understand the forces at play in these galaxies. One of the big questions is whether Dark Matter really exists, or if we should be looking at gravity differently. This is where Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND) comes in. MOND suggests that gravity behaves differently under certain conditions, especially in low-acceleration situations like the outskirts of galaxies.

Imagine you're trying to uncover a mystery without knowing if the clues are real or made up. That's what it's like for scientists trying to figure out if dark matter is a thing or if MOND is the answer. In this piece, we'll explore how disc galaxies can help us test these ideas, particularly through Gravitational Lensing.

What is Gravitational Lensing?

Gravitational lensing is a cool effect caused by massive objects bending light. It's like looking at a funhouse mirror but on a cosmic scale. When light from a distant star or galaxy passes near a massive object, like another galaxy, that object can bend the light, making it look like there are multiple images of the same star or that the star is in a different place than it really is.

Why Disc Galaxies?

Disc galaxies are particularly useful for these studies because they have a clear structure and a lot of mass concentrated in a thin plane. This makes it easier to see how light is affected when it passes by. With the new telescopes being built, we'll have plenty of opportunities to observe many of these events and gather data.

Dark Matter vs. Modified Gravity

The standard idea in cosmology is that dark matter is a mysterious, invisible stuff that makes up a lot of the universe. We can't see it directly, but we can see its effects on galaxies and other large structures. However, scientists haven't been able to find dark matter particles, which raises questions about its existence.

On the other hand, MOND tries to explain the same observations without needing dark matter. It says that under certain conditions, gravity behaves differently than Newton's laws predict. The challenge is to figure out which idea is right—dark matter or MOND.

The Plan

In our study, we look at how disc galaxies can help us understand these two competing ideas. We use a method that combines information from the way galaxies rotate with how they bend light. By doing this, we hope to see if there's a noticeable difference between the predictions made by dark matter theories and those made by MOND.

Building Our Model

To study the effects of lensing in disc galaxies under the MOND framework, we need to create a model that accurately reflects what we observe. This involves creating a system that mimics how the stars and gas are distributed within a galaxy. We also need to model the effect of MOND on the gravitational field.

The Baryonic Component

In disc galaxies, most of the mass comes from stars and gas—what scientists call baryonic matter. We can model this by using a mix of a thick disc and a spherical bulge. The bulge is like the doughy center of the pizza, while the disc is the thin, crispy layer around it.

This allows us to create a picture of how matter is distributed in the galaxy, which will help us understand how light is bent around it.

The Simulation

Once we have our model in place, we can run simulations to see how light behaves when it interacts with our mock disc galaxy under MOND conditions. We calculate how inclined the galaxy is and how this affects the way light bends.

Inclination Effects

Inclination is the angle at which the galaxy is tilted relative to our line of sight. A galaxy that's edge-on (like a flat pancake) will behave differently than one that's face-on (like a pizza). The tilt affects how we observe the lensing effects.

When a galaxy is tilted, the light from distant stars may bend in unexpected ways, making it seem like there are more images of the same star or affecting their brightness. As it turns out, inclination matters a lot in MOND.

The Results

After running our simulations, we found some interesting things. The total number of lensing events we predicted under MOND conditions was much higher than what traditional dark matter models suggested. This means if we start seeing more lenses than expected in upcoming surveys, it could point toward MOND being a better explanation for what we're observing.

Lensing Cross Sections

The lensing cross section is a way to measure how effective a galaxy is at bending light. We calculated the cross sections for our disc galaxies, varying things like the thickness of the disc and the size of the bulge.

Interestingly, we found that changes in the bulge size could lead to unexpected results in lensing predictions. For example, more diffuse bulges can actually increase the chances of strong lensing, which doesn't fit with the expectations of dark matter models.

Implications

So, what does all of this mean? If future observations reveal that disc galaxies are indeed producing far more lensing events than predicted by dark matter models, we could have strong evidence in favor of MOND.

The Future of Observations

With upcoming telescopes like Euclid and LSST, we'll have the ability to observe hundreds of thousands of lensing events in disc galaxies. These studies will help to determine if MOND or dark matter theories are more aligned with reality.

Conclusion

In the quest to understand our universe, we find ourselves at a crossroads between dark matter and MOND. Disc galaxies serve as valuable test beds for these theories. With the right observations and models, we may soon uncover whether we're looking at a universe filled with invisible matter or if we need to rethink the laws of gravity altogether.

A Cosmic Comedy

As we do our cosmic detective work, who knows? We might even discover that the universe has a sense of humor. Maybe dark matter just likes to play hide and seek, or perhaps gravity is just a little quirky. Science is all about finding the fun in the unknown. So grab your telescope, and let's see what the universe has in store for us!

Original Source

Title: A Novel Test for MOND: Gravitational Lensing by Disc Galaxies

Abstract: Disc galaxies represent a promising laboratory for the study of gravitational physics, including alternatives to dark matter, owing to the possibility of coupling rotation curves' dynamical data with strong gravitational lensing observations. In particular, Euclid, DES and LSST are predicted to observe hundreds of thousands of gravitational lenses. Here, we investigate disc galaxy strong gravitational lensing in the MOND framework. We employ the concept of equivalent Newtonian systems within the quasi-linear MOND formulation to make use of the standard lensing formalism. We derive the phantom dark matter distribution predicted for realistic disc galaxy models and study the impact of morphological and mass parameters on the expected lensing. We find purely MONDian effects dominate the lensing and generate non-trivial correlations between the lens parameters and the lensing cross section. Moreover, we show that the standard realisation of MOND predicts a number count of disc galaxy lenses of one order of magnitude higher than the dark matter-driven predictions, making it distinguishable from the latter in upcoming surveys. Finally, we show that disc galaxy gravitational lensing can be used to strongly constrain the interpolating function of MOND.

Authors: Christopher Harvey-Hawes, Marco Galoppo

Last Update: 2024-11-26 00:00:00

Language: English

Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.17888

Source PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2411.17888

Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.

Thank you to arxiv for use of its open access interoperability.

More from authors

Similar Articles