Game Recommendations Made Easy
A chatbot simplifies finding your next favorite game.
Se-eun Yoon, Xiaokai Wei, Yexi Jiang, Rachit Pareek, Frank Ong, Kevin Gao, Julian McAuley, Michelle Gong
― 6 min read
Table of Contents
- What is a Conversational Recommender System?
- Why Change the Game?
- Gathering Real User Requests
- The Challenge of Real Requests
- Tools, Tools, and More Tools!
- Types of Tools We Have
- How the Chatbot Works
- Testing the Chatbot
- Key Metrics to Evaluate
- Results from the Tests
- Sharing Our Lessons Learned
- Key Takeaways
- Future Plans and Improvements
- Ideas for Future Features
- Conclusion
- Original Source
- Reference Links
Let’s face it, finding a new game to play can be like looking for a needle in a haystack. With so many choices available, how can anyone decide what to try next? This is where our friendly chatbot comes in to make life easier. This chatbot uses natural language to understand what you want and provides recommendations tailored just for you. So, no more guesswork or endless scrolling through game lists!
Conversational Recommender System?
What is aA Conversational Recommender System (CRS) is essentially a smart buddy who can help you pick a game. Instead of you sifting through countless options, you tell the bot what you like, and it suggests relevant games. It’s like having a personal shopper, but for video games!
Why Change the Game?
Existing systems might only use a couple of tools to answer your queries. However, real users often have complex requests. Imagine saying, "I want a game that my 7-year-old nephew would enjoy on a tablet." That’s a whole can of worms! To tackle such challenges, our chatbot uses more than ten tools. That’s right—ten! The idea is to access vast information and give you better recommendations.
Gathering Real User Requests
Before we could build the system, we needed to find out how real people ask for game recommendations. So, we turned to a famous online community where gamers hang out and chat about games. We looked for posts where users were asking for suggestions and collected a bunch of these requests. It was like digging for treasure—only this treasure was full of insights!
The Challenge of Real Requests
Now, here’s the twist: real user requests are often messy. People use slang, abbreviations, and sometimes even typos. For instance, someone might say "MM2" when they really mean "Murder Mystery 2." We needed to teach our chatbot how to understand all these quirks. That required a lot of clever tools to help it make sense of what users meant.
Tools, Tools, and More Tools!
We put together a toolbox filled with a variety of tools to help the chatbot provide the best recommendations. Each tool serves a different purpose, such as finding game names, checking genre categories, and even pulling in data about device compatibility. This is where it gets interesting—each tool is like a special gadget that helps the chatbot do its job better.
Types of Tools We Have
- Lookup Tools: These tools fetch simple information from the game database. If you need to know the genre of a game, this is what you’d use.
- Linking Tools: When users mention games using casual language, these tools help the chatbot match those names to real game titles.
- Retrieval Tools: If a user has a favorite game, these tools find similar ones that users might like.
- Formatting Tools: After executing tools, these help summarize the results in a way that makes sense to users.
Together, these tools work in harmony to provide recommendations that are relevant and, most importantly, fun!
How the Chatbot Works
When you type in your gaming wish, the chatbot gets to work. First, it translates your words into a clear and structured format. This helps the chatbot understand what you're looking for. Then, it uses its toolbox to gather relevant information based on your request. Finally, the chatbot brings all the pieces together and provides a list of game suggestions. Boom! You're ready to play.
Testing the Chatbot
Once we had our system set up, we needed to test it. We wanted to see if it really worked as well as we hoped. So, we put the chatbot through its paces with real user requests. How did it do? You bet we did some serious number crunching to figure it all out!
Key Metrics to Evaluate
To ensure our chatbot was performing well, we focused on a few key criteria:
- Relevance: Did the suggested games match what users asked for?
- Novelty: Were users discovering new games, or just getting the same popular ones over and over?
- Coverage: Were we suggesting a diverse range of games for different types of players?
Results from the Tests
The results were pretty encouraging! Our chatbot outperformed traditional systems by a long shot. Users reported that they found the recommendations much more relevant and exciting. Plus, they liked that they were discovering new games they hadn’t heard of before.
Sharing Our Lessons Learned
After putting the chatbot through the wringer, we gathered our experiences and wrote down what worked and what didn’t. This isn’t just for bragging rights; we want to help others who might be trying to build similar systems. Sharing knowledge is a big part of advancing tech in a collaborative way.
Key Takeaways
- Real User Data Matters: Gathering requests from actual users gives you valuable insights that synthetic data cannot replicate.
- Tool Diversity is Key: Using a wide range of tools helps the system handle varied and complex requests better.
- Iterate and Improve: Regular testing and feedback cycles are essential to make the system better over time.
Future Plans and Improvements
While we’re proud of the chatbot’s current capabilities, there’s always room for improvement. We plan to continue refining the system based on user feedback and advancements in technology.
Ideas for Future Features
- User Feedback Loop: Adding a way for users to easily give feedback on recommendations can help improve the system's accuracy over time.
- Safety Features: Implementing measures to prevent inappropriate content from being recommended is crucial for user safety.
- More Tools: As technology evolves, we hope to add more tools to our toolbox to keep the recommendations fresh and engaging.
Conclusion
The world of gaming is vast, and our chatbot is here to help you find your next great adventure. By listening to real users, using a robust set of tools, and continuously improving based on feedback, we aim to make your gaming experience smooth and enjoyable. So, next time you’re stuck wondering what to play, just chat with our bot, and you might just uncover your new favorite game! Happy gaming!
Title: OMuleT: Orchestrating Multiple Tools for Practicable Conversational Recommendation
Abstract: In this paper, we present a systematic effort to design, evaluate, and implement a realistic conversational recommender system (CRS). The objective of our system is to allow users to input free-form text to request recommendations, and then receive a list of relevant and diverse items. While previous work on synthetic queries augments large language models (LLMs) with 1-3 tools, we argue that a more extensive toolbox is necessary to effectively handle real user requests. As such, we propose a novel approach that equips LLMs with over 10 tools, providing them access to the internal knowledge base and API calls used in production. We evaluate our model on a dataset of real users and show that it generates relevant, novel, and diverse recommendations compared to vanilla LLMs. Furthermore, we conduct ablation studies to demonstrate the effectiveness of using the full range of tools in our toolbox. We share our designs and lessons learned from deploying the system for internal alpha release. Our contribution is the addressing of all four key aspects of a practicable CRS: (1) real user requests, (2) augmenting LLMs with a wide variety of tools, (3) extensive evaluation, and (4) deployment insights.
Authors: Se-eun Yoon, Xiaokai Wei, Yexi Jiang, Rachit Pareek, Frank Ong, Kevin Gao, Julian McAuley, Michelle Gong
Last Update: 2024-12-31 00:00:00
Language: English
Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.19352
Source PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2411.19352
Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.
Thank you to arxiv for use of its open access interoperability.
Reference Links
- https://praw.readthedocs.io/en/stable/
- https://www.acm.org/publications/taps/whitelist-of-latex-packages
- https://dl.acm.org/ccs.cfm
- https://www.acm.org/publications/proceedings-template
- https://capitalizemytitle.com/
- https://www.acm.org/publications/class-2012
- https://dl.acm.org/ccs/ccs.cfm
- https://ctan.org/pkg/booktabs
- https://goo.gl/VLCRBB
- https://www.acm.org/publications/taps/describing-figures/