Breathing Dynamics of Unitary Fermi Gas
Study reveals long-lived breathing modes in ultra-cold fermionic gases.
Dali Sun, Jing Min, Xiangchuan Yan, Lu Wang, Xin Xie, Xizhi Wu, Jeff Maki, Shizhong Zhang, Shi-Guo Peng, Mingsheng Zhan, Kaijun Jiang
― 7 min read
Table of Contents
- What is a Unitary Fermi Gas?
- SO(2,1) Dynamical Symmetry
- Breaking the Rules in 2D
- Long-Lived Breathing Mode in 3D
- What Happens When Things Go Wrong?
- Observing the Breathing Mode
- The Boltzmann Breather Connection
- Robustness Across Different Conditions
- The Role of Damping Factors
- Conclusion
- Original Source
- Reference Links
In the world of physics, there's a lot of complicated stuff happening that even the smartest folks can struggle to wrap their heads around. One intriguing area is the behavior of ultra-cold gases, especially a special type of gas called a Unitary Fermi Gas. It sounds fancy, but it just means we're looking at a gas made of fermions (think of them as the "party poopers" of the particle world that don't like to be in the same place at once) interacting in a very specific way.
Our story begins with breathing. No, not the kind you do while exercising, but something scientists call a "breathing oscillation." This is where the gas expands and contracts rhythmically, similar to how your chest rises and falls when you breathe. In certain conditions, these oscillations can go on for a long time, which is quite exciting because it's rare for such behaviors to last.
What is a Unitary Fermi Gas?
Now, let's break down what a unitary Fermi gas is. Imagine a bunch of fermions hanging out together in a super cold room (we’re talking just above absolute zero). At these temperatures, their behaviors change dramatically. They start acting in ways that are hard to predict because they are no longer just bouncing off each other like marbles. Instead, they get into a state where their interactions become strong and a bit chaotic.
In this state, the fermions are held in a trap, much like a hamster in a cozy cage. This trap is often a magnetic one, but it can also be made of lasers. The goal is to keep the fermions from running away as they undergo fascinating interactions.
SO(2,1) Dynamical Symmetry
Alright, here comes the tricky part. There's something in physics called SO(2,1) symmetry, which is a fancy way of saying there are certain rules that dictate how our gas behaves when it's bouncing around the trap. Think of it like following the dance steps to a waltz. Even if the dancers (our fermions) are having fun and moving around, they still need to follow a rhythm.
This SO(2,1) symmetry predicts that the breathing oscillations of our gas will be isentropic, meaning they can keep going without losing any energy. But, just like when someone steps on your foot during the dance, things can go wrong. In lower dimensions, like 2D, the symmetry can break down because the interactions get a bit too wild and chaotic. This means that the oscillations won't last forever – they fizzle out instead.
Breaking the Rules in 2D
In our journey through this world, we find that in two dimensions, things don't play by the same rules as in three dimensions. The quantum anomalies, which are unexpected quirks that pop up, can mess with the symmetry. Imagine trying to dance in a small room filled with furniture – you're going to bump into things and lose your rhythm.
In the 2D realm, when you have strong interactions, the Damping (which is just a way of saying how quickly something loses energy) increases significantly. So, the lifespan of these breathing modes becomes much shorter. But when we step back into the 3D world, things become a bit smoother.
Long-Lived Breathing Mode in 3D
Here's where it gets really exciting! Scientists have found ways to create that long-lived breathing mode in a 3D unitary Fermi gas. How do they do it? With a little help from our friend, SO(2,1) symmetry. By preparing the gas just right in an isotropic trap and adjusting interactions carefully, they can achieve that persistent breather – almost like a never-ending dance party!
When the gas expands and contracts, it does so at a frequency that is twice the frequency of the trap itself. It's like a supercharged heartbeat! Plus, the damping ratio is astonishingly low. Imagine almost no one stepping on your toes while you dance.
Even when the density and temperature change, this breathing mode persists, showcasing the robustness of this SO(2,1) symmetry in the three-dimensional space.
What Happens When Things Go Wrong?
It's not all smooth sailing, though. There are still some factors that cause a little trouble. Think of it as a pesky fly buzzing around during your dance. Things like asphericity (how the trap isn’t perfectly round), Anharmonicity (the trap is not behaving exactly like a perfect spring), and even bulk viscosity (a measure of how the gas flows) can cause some residual damping.
When they managed to keep the damping rate so low, it was akin to winning the cosmic lottery. Understanding these damping factors is key, as they help scientists figure out why some breathing modes lose energy more quickly than others.
Observing the Breathing Mode
To see this breathing mode in action, researchers set up their 3D unitary Fermi gas in a trap and carefully modulated the optical field. It’s kind of like playing with a yo-yo – you need to give it the right flick to get it going. After they stirred things up, they let the gas evolve for a bit before imaging the cloud to see how it behaved over time.
What’s remarkable is that the oscillation can persist for tens of milliseconds, and even at large amplitudes, the breathing frequency remains consistent. It’s like finding out that you can keep dancing no matter how big your partner is stepping!
The Boltzmann Breather Connection
Oh, and if you thought dancing in circles was fun, wait till you hear about the Boltzmann breather! This is a concept from classical physics where non-interacting particles can move in undamped oscillatory ways. Scientists have drawn parallels between this and what’s happening with our unitary Fermi gas, making it a captivating crossover point between classical and quantum worlds.
Robustness Across Different Conditions
Perhaps the best part is the resilience displayed in this unitary Fermi gas. Even when researchers changed the density and temperature, the frequency of the breathing mode remained constant. This is unlike the 2D scenario, where changing conditions would significantly affect everything. It’s as if the gas has a magical resilience that keeps it dancing through different states without missing a beat.
The Role of Damping Factors
As previously mentioned, while we’ve got a fantastic persistent breather, it’s still a bit damped. To investigate this, scientists used their clever insights. They examined how asphericity (the not-so-perfect roundness of the trap) affects the damping. By tweaking the trap’s shape, they could observe changes in how quickly the gas lost its breathiness.
They also looked at trap anharmonicity. As the cloud expands, the iconic spring-like nature of the trap gets a bit distorted. The researchers found that the anharmonicity can cause even more energy loss in these oscillations.
Finally, bulk viscosity – a property related to how the gas flows – was also considered. When the magnetic field is slightly off-rhythm from resonance, it can introduce additional damping.
Conclusion
To wrap up our tale, the experimental realization of a long-lived breathing oscillation in a unitary Fermi gas is a significant achievement. The SO(2,1) symmetry keeps it alive and kicking, making it a delightful topic to probe deeper into non-equilibrium dynamics. This fascinating behavior in a 3D space opens up a treasure trove of possibilities for exploring new quantum phenomenons.
Scientists are now excited to keep the dance floor open, seeking to understand how this persistence can inform us about thermalization, quenched dynamics, and hydrodynamics in quantum systems.
And who knows, maybe one day, we’ll all be able to join in on the cosmic dance! After all, if quantum gases can do it, why can’t we?
Title: Persistent breather and dynamical symmetry in a unitary Fermi gas
Abstract: SO(2,1) dynamical symmetry makes a remarkable prediction that the breathing oscillation of a scale invariant quantum gas in an isotropic harmonic trap is isentropic and can persist indefinitely. In 2D, this symmetry is broken due to quantum anomaly in the strongly interacting range, and consequently the lifetime of the breathing mode becomes finite. The persistent breather in a strongly interacting system has so far not been realized. Here we experimentally achieve the long-lived breathing mode in a 3D unitary Fermi gas, which is protected by the SO(2,1) symmetry. The nearly perfect SO(2,1) symmetry is realized by loading the ultracold Fermi gas in an isotropic trap and tuning the interatomic interaction to resonance. The breathing mode oscillates at twice the trapping frequency even for large excitation amplitudes. The ratio of damping rate to oscillation frequency is as small as 0.002, providing an interacting persistent breather. The oscillation frequency and damping rate keep nearly constant for different atomic densities and temperatures, demonstrating the robustness of the SO(2,1) symmetry in 3D. The factors that lead to the residual damping have also been clarified. This work opens the way to study many-body non-equilibrium dynamics related to the dynamical symmetry.
Authors: Dali Sun, Jing Min, Xiangchuan Yan, Lu Wang, Xin Xie, Xizhi Wu, Jeff Maki, Shizhong Zhang, Shi-Guo Peng, Mingsheng Zhan, Kaijun Jiang
Last Update: 2024-11-26 00:00:00
Language: English
Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.18022
Source PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2411.18022
Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.
Thank you to arxiv for use of its open access interoperability.
Reference Links
- https://doi.org/
- https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-07272-6
- https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031214-014548
- https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0667-0
- https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0659-0
- https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0674-1
- https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys3491
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.55.R853
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.74.053604
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.090402
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.020604
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.070404
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.250402
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.9.021035
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.095302
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.185303
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.120402
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.120401
- https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau4402
- https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf0666
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.5315
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.2360
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.102.063319
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.243403
- https://doi.org/10.1088/0256-307X/38/5/056701
- https://doi.org/10/gr5972
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.56.4855
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.692
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.2196
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.110.023312
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.500
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.764
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.150402
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.170404
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.150403
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.78.053609
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.055303
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.040405
- https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1195219
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.100.023601
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.040401
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.253401
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.253002
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.205301
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.101.013620
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2019.167949
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.240402
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.040401
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.160404
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.76.033610