Addressing Sensitive Content on Social Media
A new dataset aims to improve the classification of harmful content online.
Dimosthenis Antypas, Indira Sen, Carla Perez-Almendros, Jose Camacho-Collados, Francesco Barbieri
― 7 min read
Table of Contents
- Why Do We Need Sensitive Content Classification?
- The Current State of Moderation Tools
- The New Dataset for Social Media Moderation
- Comparing Models for Better Detection
- The Need for More Than Just Keywords
- How We Annotated the Data
- The Results Are In!
- The Performance Analysis of Models
- Challenges in Classifying Sensitive Content
- The Importance of Transparency and Ethics
- Conclusion: Moving Forward in Content Moderation
- Original Source
- Reference Links
Social media is a big part of our lives, and while it connects us, it can also expose us to some not-so-nice content. Imagine scrolling through your feed and stumbling upon posts about self-harm, drugs, or hate speech. Not cool, right? That's where sensitive content classification comes in—it's all about finding and filtering out harmful stuff so you can enjoy your social media experience without the unwanted drama.
Why Do We Need Sensitive Content Classification?
First off, let's face it: the internet can be a wild place. With everyone and their grandmother sharing opinions online, sensitive content can slip through the cracks. This is a problem because we want to make sure the data shared is safe and respectful. It’s like having a bouncer at a club who checks IDs to keep out the troublemakers. Without proper classification, harmful content can spread, leading to real-world consequences. So, knowing how to detect and filter sensitive content is as important as knowing how to use emojis correctly in text messages!
Moderation Tools
The Current State ofYou might wonder, "Isn’t there already a way to catch this nasty stuff?" Well, yes and no. There are moderation tools like Perspective and OpenAI's moderation APIs, but they come with a few hiccups. They might not be very customizable, meaning they struggle to adapt to specific sensitive topics. Plus, privacy concerns arise when using external servers. Imagine sending your private messages to a stranger—yikes!
Many of these tools focus mostly on toxic language, while other serious categories like self-harm and substance abuse don't get as much attention. It’s like focusing on someone’s bad haircut when their entire outfit is a fashion disaster! This leaves big gaps in what we can effectively monitor and filter.
Dataset for Social Media Moderation
The NewTo tackle these issues, we’ve come up with a fancy solution: a new dataset designed specifically for moderating social media content! This dataset covers six important sensitive categories: conflictual language, profanity, sexually explicit material, drug-related content, self-harm, and spam. By collecting and organizing this data wisely, we aim to fill the gaps left by previous research. It’s like creating a complete toolbox instead of just having a hammer and a wrench.
The data is gathered and checked thoroughly to ensure consistent quality across all categories. Think of it as making sure that every cupcake in a bakery is equally delicious—nobody wants to bite into a stale one!
Comparing Models for Better Detection
Now, here’s where it gets interesting. We found that when we fine-tuned large language models using our new dataset, they performed way better at detecting sensitive content than the off-the-shelf models. It’s like training a puppy to fetch compared to expecting a squirrel to do the same—it’s just not going to happen.
In our experiments, we compared various models. The finer-tuned models generally did much better, with the best results coming from those with a whopping 8 billion parameters. Smaller models still put up a decent fight, but they lagged behind by a few points.
The Need for More Than Just Keywords
Before this dataset, many projects relied on a limited set of keywords to collect data, leading to a shallow understanding of sensitive content. Imagine trying to catch a fish with just a net full of holes—good luck with that! We realized that using more comprehensive methods to gather keywords, such as expanding and refining them, leads to better results.
In our dataset, we made sure to include various sources for gathering seed words so that we have a robust list, giving us a better chance of detecting all kinds of sensitive content. It’s like preparing for a potluck dinner—not just bringing potato salad but making sure there’s a variety of dishes so everyone can find something they like!
How We Annotated the Data
Collecting data is just one part of the equation; we also needed to annotate it. This means having people read through the tweets and decide if they belong to one of our sensitive categories. Just like a team of friends deciding which movie to watch, we had multiple coders look at each tweet to ensure accuracy. We aimed for at least three coders to evaluate each tweet, and they had to decide if the tweet was sensitive or not.
Sometimes they disagreed, and that’s normal. But to make things simpler, we merged similar categories, like hate speech and other conflictual language. Think of it like combining different flavors of ice cream into one sundae—still yum!
The Results Are In!
What did we find? Our dataset, aptly named the X-Sensitive dataset, is quite effective. It includes about 8,000 tweets, and nearly half of them were flagged as sensitive in one of the six categories. Each tweet was usually assigned more than one label because, let’s face it, tweets can be multi-layered, just like a good lasagna!
We also noticed that different demographics of coders had varying opinions on what counts as sensitive content. For instance, younger coders were more likely to flag tweets as sensitive than older ones. So, if you're ever wondering why your parents don’t understand social media slang, now you know!
The Performance Analysis of Models
When we tested our models, the results were pretty good. The large fine-tuned models showed impressive performance, especially in identifying profanity and sexual explicit content. However, they struggled a bit more with categories like drugs and self-harm. It's like being really good at trivia but freezing up when someone asks about a specific topic—totally relatable, right?
Even the best of our models didn’t perfect everything, showing some limitations. But the overall success means they can be valuable tools to assist human moderators. After all, who doesn’t love a helpful assistant?
Challenges in Classifying Sensitive Content
Classifying sensitive content isn’t just about having a great dataset and sophisticated models. There are challenges involved. For example, some content can be tricky to Categorize, especially when it has mixed meanings. It’s like trying to explain a joke over text—it loses its punch!
Our models had a tougher time with certain categories, which shows there’s still work to be done. It’s a reminder that technology, no matter how advanced, isn't perfect, and the need for human intervention in sensitive cases is crucial.
Transparency and Ethics
The Importance ofWhen dealing with sensitive content, ethical practices are a must. We take the confidentiality of users seriously, so we made sure to anonymize personal data and treat annotators fairly. It’s like hosting a party where everyone feels welcome and safe instead of worrying about their secrets getting out.
By sharing our findings and dataset with the wider community, we hope to spur further research and improvements in sensitive content classification. The more we talk about it, the better we become at dealing with it.
Conclusion: Moving Forward in Content Moderation
In conclusion, the journey of sensitive content classification is ongoing. While we've made strides with our new dataset and model performance, there’s still a mountain of work ahead. The internet is an ever-changing landscape, and staying ahead of the game will require continuous effort and innovation.
With the right tools, a cooperative approach, and a sprinkle of humor, we can make our online spaces safer. After all, social media should be a fun and friendly place—where the biggest problem is deciding what meme to share next!
So, here's to better moderation and all the cat memes that help brighten our news feeds!
Title: Sensitive Content Classification in Social Media: A Holistic Resource and Evaluation
Abstract: The detection of sensitive content in large datasets is crucial for ensuring that shared and analysed data is free from harmful material. However, current moderation tools, such as external APIs, suffer from limitations in customisation, accuracy across diverse sensitive categories, and privacy concerns. Additionally, existing datasets and open-source models focus predominantly on toxic language, leaving gaps in detecting other sensitive categories such as substance abuse or self-harm. In this paper, we put forward a unified dataset tailored for social media content moderation across six sensitive categories: conflictual language, profanity, sexually explicit material, drug-related content, self-harm, and spam. By collecting and annotating data with consistent retrieval strategies and guidelines, we address the shortcomings of previous focalised research. Our analysis demonstrates that fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) on this novel dataset yields significant improvements in detection performance compared to open off-the-shelf models such as LLaMA, and even proprietary OpenAI models, which underperform by 10-15% overall. This limitation is even more pronounced on popular moderation APIs, which cannot be easily tailored to specific sensitive content categories, among others.
Authors: Dimosthenis Antypas, Indira Sen, Carla Perez-Almendros, Jose Camacho-Collados, Francesco Barbieri
Last Update: 2024-12-06 00:00:00
Language: English
Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.19832
Source PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2411.19832
Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.
Thank you to arxiv for use of its open access interoperability.
Reference Links
- https://www.latex-project.org/help/documentation/encguide.pdf
- https://perspectiveapi.com/
- https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/moderation
- https://fvancesco.github.io/tmp/hl500.html
- https://huggingface.co/datasets/cardiffnlp/x_sensitive
- https://huggingface.co/cardiffnlp/twitter-roberta-large-sensitive-multilabel
- https://huggingface.co/cardiffnlp/twitter-roberta-large-sensitive-binary
- https://openai.com/chatgpt
- https://cohere.com/
- https://github.com/IDEA-NTHU-Taiwan/porn_ngram_filter
- https://github.com/LDNOOBW/List-of-Dirty-Naughty-Obscene-and-Otherwise-Bad-Words
- https://github.com/facebookresearch/flores/tree/main/toxicity
- https://www.talktofrank.com/drugs-a-z