Bridging Knowledge and Action in AI
LMAct benchmark reveals challenges in real-time decision-making for AI models.
Anian Ruoss, Fabio Pardo, Harris Chan, Bonnie Li, Volodymyr Mnih, Tim Genewein
― 5 min read
Table of Contents
- The Problem with Current Models
- What is LMAct?
- The Tasks Involved
- Measuring Performance
- Results of the Benchmark
- Analysis of Findings
- The Importance of Representation
- The Role of Observations
- In-context Learning
- The Quest for Better Decision-Making
- Future Directions
- Conclusion
- Original Source
- Reference Links
In the world of artificial intelligence, there are models that are doing amazing things. These models can write essays, play chess, and even chat with you. However, when it comes to making decisions in real-time situations—like playing a video game or solving a puzzle—these models often struggle. This is where LMAct comes in. It's a new way to test how well these models can learn from watching experts.
The Problem with Current Models
Many advanced models today are very knowledgeable but might not know how to use that knowledge effectively. Think of someone who has read all the books on fishing but has never actually gone fishing. They might struggle when it comes time to cast the line! In the same way, these models can fail at tasks that require quick thinking or Decision-making, even when they have the book smarts.
What is LMAct?
LMAct is a benchmark that challenges modern models to learn from expert Demonstrations across a wide range of tasks. It allows these models to watch how experts perform tasks, and then they can try to mimic those actions in their own decision-making processes. Imagine trying to learn how to cook by watching a master chef—this is essentially what this benchmark does for AI.
The Tasks Involved
LMAct includes six different tasks. Each task is designed to test the model's decision-making skills in various environments. These tasks include playing games like tic-tac-toe, chess, and other interactive challenges such as navigating grid worlds and solving crosswords. Each task offers unique challenges that require different skills.
Measuring Performance
To evaluate how well the models succeed, LMAct measures their performance based on how many expert demonstrations they receive. These demonstrations show the models what to do, similar to how an apprentice learns from a master. The more demonstrations the model sees, the better it should theoretically perform. But, as it turns out, this isn't always the case.
Results of the Benchmark
The results of the LMAct benchmark show that even the most advanced models don't always perform as expected. They often struggle to reach the level of experts, even with many demonstrations. In many cases, providing more examples doesn’t help at all, which is a bit like showing a cat a laser pointer and hoping it will understand how to catch it—sometimes they just look at you as if you’ve lost your mind!
Analysis of Findings
Interestingly, the models' performance did not significantly improve with the number of demonstrations. However, some models did get better at certain tasks after seeing a few demonstrations. It's as if they were warm-ups before the big game.
The Importance of Representation
Another factor that played a significant role was how the tasks were presented. Different models reacted differently based on whether they were given text or images to work with. Just like a chef might prefer a recipe in pictures rather than words, these models had their preferences too. This shows that how information is formatted can greatly impact performance.
Observations
The Role ofObservations, or how the model perceives the task, are crucial. The benchmark tests how well the models can process different types of observations. Some models can understand tasks better when given visual cues, while others excel with written instructions. It’s all about finding the right style for each model, much like selecting the perfect tool for a DIY project.
In-context Learning
One of the fascinating elements of LMAct is in-context learning. This means that the models can learn and adapt their responses based on the context they are given. Think of it as a game of charades. If you start off with a few actions, the guessers may slowly start to pick up on the cues and get it right over time. In the same way, these models learn how to act based on what they have seen previously.
The Quest for Better Decision-Making
The ultimate goal of LMAct is to improve decision-making in AI models, bridging the gap between knowing something and actually doing it. The struggle these models face highlights a significant challenge in AI: the "knowing-doing" gap. It’s as if the model knows that ice cream is delicious but can’t quite figure out how to get to the ice cream truck!
Future Directions
The findings from the LMAct benchmark raise interesting questions about how future AI models can be developed. More research is needed to find methods that would help models learn better from examples. It is essential to uncover whether these models need different types of information during their training or if they require new ways of processing information to enhance their performance.
Conclusion
In summary, LMAct is a new benchmark that examines how well AI models can learn from expert demonstrations across various tasks. While many models possess impressive knowledge, they often find it challenging to translate that knowledge into effective action. The insights gained from this benchmark will help shape the future of AI development, leading to models that are not only wise but also capable of taking action. After all, it's not just what you know that matters; it's whether you can pull off that knowledge when it’s game time!
Original Source
Title: LMAct: A Benchmark for In-Context Imitation Learning with Long Multimodal Demonstrations
Abstract: Today's largest foundation models have increasingly general capabilities, yet when used as agents, they often struggle with simple reasoning and decision-making tasks, even though they possess good factual knowledge of the task and how to solve it. In this paper, we present a benchmark to pressure-test these models' multimodal decision-making capabilities in the very long-context regime (up to one million tokens) and investigate whether they can learn from a large number of expert demonstrations in their context. We evaluate a wide range of state-of-the-art frontier models as policies across a battery of simple interactive decision-making tasks: playing tic-tac-toe, chess, and Atari, navigating grid worlds, solving crosswords, and controlling a simulated cheetah. We measure the performance of Claude 3.5 Sonnet, Gemini 1.5 Flash, Gemini 1.5 Pro, GPT-4o, o1-mini, and o1-preview under increasing amounts of expert demonstrations in the context $\unicode{x2013}$ from no demonstrations up to 512 full episodes, pushing these models' multimodal long-context reasoning capabilities to their limits. Across our tasks, today's frontier models rarely manage to fully reach expert performance, showcasing the difficulty of our benchmark. Presenting more demonstrations often has little effect, but some models steadily improve with more demonstrations on a few tasks. We investigate the effect of encoding observations as text or images and the impact of chain-of-thought prompting. Overall, our results suggest that even today's most capable models often struggle to imitate desired behavior by generalizing purely from in-context demonstrations. To help quantify the impact of other approaches and future innovations aiming to tackle this problem, we open source our benchmark that covers the zero-, few-, and many-shot regimes in a unified evaluation.
Authors: Anian Ruoss, Fabio Pardo, Harris Chan, Bonnie Li, Volodymyr Mnih, Tim Genewein
Last Update: 2024-12-02 00:00:00
Language: English
Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.01441
Source PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.01441
Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.
Thank you to arxiv for use of its open access interoperability.