Simple Science

Cutting edge science explained simply

# Physics# Solar and Stellar Astrophysics# Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics

Stars, Light, and the Atmosphere: A Cosmic Study

Astronomers study how Earth's atmosphere affects starlight over twelve years.

― 7 min read


Starlight and Earth'sStarlight and Earth'sAtmosphere Exploredaffects light from stars.A twelve-year study on how atmosphere
Table of Contents

Studying the stars is serious business, but sometimes it needs a little light-heartedness. This piece looks at the work done by astronomers over a twelve-year period, observing standard stars while trying to figure out how much light the Earth’s atmosphere snatches away. Think of it as a cosmic game of hide and seek, where the Sun’s rays are the players trying to reach us, but the atmosphere, acting like a mischievous imp, often plays tricks along the way.

The Telescope and Equipment

Our cosmic investigation took place at the TUBITAK National Observatory, where a 1-meter telescope, affectionately named T100, served as the eye into the sky. This telescope is not just any telescope; it has a special setup called a Ritchey-Chretien optical system. This means it can see far and wide, making it an ideal tool for astronomers. Imagine trying to spot a friend in a crowded café, and then being given a pair of binoculars – that’s what T100 does!

At the heart of this observation system is a CCD Camera, which stands for Charge-Coupled Device – a fancy way of saying it captures light. Think of it as a digital camera on steroids! Along with this, Bessell filters were used to sort the starlight into different colors, allowing astronomers to get all the details.

What Are Standard Stars?

But hold on, what exactly are standard stars? Standard stars are like the golden children of the star world. They have known brightness levels, making them perfect reference points when measuring the brightness of other stars. When astronomers observe these steadfast stars, they can understand how the atmosphere messes with the light from other celestial bodies.

It's kind of like trying to understand how your friends look in dim lighting based on how your well-lit buddy looks. If your well-lit friend has beautiful hair and bright eyes, you can assume your friends in the shadows look just as good, just a tad less visible.

Methodology

The astronomers set out on their mission to observe stars over fifty nights stretching from 2012 to 2024. Yes, you read that right-fifty nights! It wasn’t a weekend trip; it was a cosmic marathon! During this time, they took photos of the star fields, focusing on standard stars to figure out how light disappears in the atmosphere.

These stargazers went through all the pomp and circumstance of image processing, which sounds fancy but is really just a series of steps to clean up the photos they took. They didn’t need to worry about dark frames-thankfully, the camera had low noise levels, which meant they could capture beautiful starry images without much hassle.

Atmospheric Extinction: A Sneaky Thief

One of the most important aspects of this study is understanding atmospheric extinction. This is not as scary as it sounds. Atmospheric extinction is simply the reduction in the amount of light that reaches us due to molecules, dust, and other particles in the atmosphere. If you’ve ever tried to take a picture through a dirty window, you get the idea. The more particles in the air, the less clear the image.

As light travels from stars to Earth, it can get scattered or absorbed, much like a dramatic rom-com where misunderstandings cloud the relationship. Higher altitudes mean less atmosphere to muck things up, but when you’re on the ground, it can feel like you’re staring through a foggy pane.

Discovering the Variations Over Time

This study did not just stop at the stars; it looked at how the atmosphere changes over time. During their twelve years of observation, the astronomers noticed that the primary extinction coefficients had a rollercoaster ride. They decreased from 2012 to 2019, which suggested that the atmosphere was behaving quite nicely. However, things took a turn for the worse after 2019, as the coefficients began to climb. It's like the atmosphere decided to throw a tantrum!

The secondary extinction coefficients, which are linked to color, did not show any significant changes. So, we have one coefficient acting like a drama queen and the other behaving like a cool cucumber.

Observational Seasons

The astronomers also took note of their observations across different seasons. It turns out that winter and spring were not great times for clear observations, as they only managed to gather a few data points during these months. Summer and autumn, however, were much more favorable for capturing those beautiful star photos. So, summer stargazing is not just a romantic notion; it’s the time when the cosmos puts on its best show!

The Zero Point Mystery

In the world of photometry, the ‘zero point’ is crucial. It’s like the starting line in a race. If the starting line moves, the measurements become confusing. The astronomers noticed changes in Zero Points over their twelve-year study, suggesting that the T100 telescope's mirror was losing some effectiveness. If we think of the telescope as a giant eye, it seems it needed a good cleaning every now and then.

In 2022, the team cleaned the mirror, and it was as if the telescope had put on its glasses-it suddenly brightened up! Regular maintenance is key, even for cosmic viewers.

Transformation Coefficients

The study resulted in a reliable set of transformation coefficients. These coefficients help translate the data collected through the T100 photometric system into readable formats. Imagine having a secret code for your club of stargazers; the transformation coefficients act as that code, allowing them to compare their findings with other systems.

The Sources of Atmospheric Extinction

The astronomers also dug deeper, looking at where the atmospheric extinction was coming from. They categorized the sources of extinction based on scattering effects. It turns out that during winter and autumn, most of the scattering was from molecules (like Rayleigh scattering), but during summer, the air also contained a bit more dust and aerosols.

This means that summer nights might not be the ideal time for viewing stars because of the extra dust and particles floating around. So now we know-while the stars may twinkle brightly, the air sometimes has its own agenda!

Comparison with Other Systems

To see how the T100 system stacked up against the Landolt standards, the team compared star measurements between the two systems. They found some systematic differences. It’s like trying to find the right amount of sugar in a recipe-sometimes, each system has its own taste!

The differences were relatively small for most stars, but certain colors showed more variance. This suggests that the equipment’s quantum efficiency (or how well it grabs light) varies from one system to another.

Conclusion: A Cosmic Friendship

After many nights spent observing the stars, our astronomers found valuable insights about how the atmosphere affects starlight. They’ve established a reliable set of transformation relations which can help others in the astronomical community standardize their photometric measures.

Their findings not only provide clarity on atmospheric extinction but also help future astronomers avoid those pesky seasonal pitfalls. So next time you look up at a starry sky, remember-it takes a lot of hard work, a dash of humor, and a good dose of patience to make sense of all that twinkling beauty!

Astronomy may seem like a realm of complicated equations and theories, but in the end, it’s about understanding our place in the universe, one star at a time. Whether running after a shooting star or pondering the mysteries of the cosmos, the journey of discovery is always worth it!

With every observation, we grow a little closer to the stars, and who knows? Maybe one day, you’ll be the one peering into the cosmos with your trusty telescope, uncovering the mysteries of the universe!

Original Source

Title: Transformation relations for UBV photometric system of 1m telescope at the T\"{U}B\.{I}TAK National Observatory

Abstract: UBV CCD observations of standard stars selected from Landolt (2009, 2013) were performed using the 1-meter telescope (T100) of the T\"{U}B\.{I}TAK National Observatory equipped with a back-illuminated and UV enhanced CCD camera and Bessell UBV filters. Observations span a long time from the years 2012 to 2024, 50 photometric nights in total. Photometric measurements were used to find the standard transformation relations of the T100 photometric system. The atmospheric extinction coefficients, zero points and transformation coefficients of each night were determined. It could not be found time dependence of the secondary extinction coefficients. However, it was determined that the primary extinction coefficients decreased until the year 2019 and increased after that year. It could not be found a strong seasonal variation of the extinction coefficients. Small differences in seasonal median values of them were used to attempt to find the atmospheric extinction sources. We found calculated minus catalogue values for each standard star, $\Delta(U-B)$, $\Delta(B-V)$ and $\Delta V$. Means and standard deviations of $\Delta(U-B)$, $\Delta(B-V)$ and $\Delta V$ were estimated to be 1.4$\pm$76, 1.9$\pm$18 and 0.0$\pm$36 mmag, respectively. We found that our data well matched Landolt's standards for $V$ and $B-V$, i.e. there are no systematic differences. However, there are systematic differences for $U-B$ between the two photometric systems, which is probably originated from the quantum efficiency differences of the detectors used in the photometric systems, although the median differences are relatively small ($|\Delta(U-B)|$< 50 mmag) for stars with $-0.5

Authors: T. Ak, R. Canbay, T. Yontan

Last Update: Dec 2, 2024

Language: English

Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.01882

Source PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.01882

Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.

Thank you to arxiv for use of its open access interoperability.

More from authors

Similar Articles