Sci Simple

New Science Research Articles Everyday

# Health Sciences # Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS)

Understanding Chagas Disease: A Growing Concern

Chagas disease affects millions, yet remains largely overlooked.

Mirta C. Remesar, Ester C. Sabino, Lewis F. Buss, Claudio D. Merlo, Mónica G. López, Sebastián L. Humeres, Pavón A. Héctor, C. Clara Di Germanio, Sonia Bakkour Coco, Léa C. Oliveira-da Silva, Marcelo Martins Pinto Filho, Antonio Luiz P. Ribeiro, Michael P. Busch, Ana E. del Pozo

― 7 min read


Chagas Disease: What You Chagas Disease: What You Should Know impact revealed. Insights on Chagas disease and its
Table of Contents

Chagas disease is a health issue caused by a tiny bug that carries the Trypanosoma Cruzi Parasite. This might sound scary, but think of it as a bug that's a little too friendly. It gets around by hanging out in the feces of infected triatomine bugs, which are also known as "kissing bugs" - probably because they often bite you on the lips while you sleep. About 6 million people worldwide are dealing with this uninvited guest, especially in parts of Latin America.

The disease is often called a "neglected tropical disease" because it doesn't get as much attention as other health problems, even though millions are at risk. It’s like that kid in class who raises their hand but never gets called on. Around 70 million people live in areas where they could get exposed to these pesky bugs.

How Do We Know if Someone Has Chagas Disease?

Finding out if someone has Chagas disease isn't as straightforward as checking a box on a form. Instead, healthcare workers hunt for specific Antibodies in the blood. Antibodies are like the body’s little soldiers that fight infections. If someone is infected, they might not have a lot of the parasite in their blood, so doctors often rely on these antibodies to make a diagnosis. It’s like trying to find a needle in a haystack, but the needle has made itself pretty scarce.

In places where Chagas is common, all blood donations are checked for these antibodies. This means if you go to donate blood, they'll casually check to see if you’ve been hanging out with those bugs. For first-time donors or people who've traveled to areas where Chagas is common, the same checks might happen too, especially in places that don’t usually have the disease.

But here’s the kicker: about one-third of people who test positive for these antibodies have low levels or mixed results. It’s like trying to pass a math test and getting a C when you thought you’d ace it. The doctors think these people were probably exposed to the parasite but aren't getting a clear reading from the tests.

Since it’s believed that once someone gets infected, they have it for life, even those with low antibody levels are treated as if they have the disease. This is a big deal because it means they might get unnecessary treatment, which nobody wants—especially if they’re not actually sick. That's why health organizations recommend using two different tests to catch all cases of Chagas disease, just to be safe.

What We Found in Our Study

Our team took a closer look at this situation. We went to the Chaco province in Argentina, which is a hotspot for Chagas disease, and targeted Blood Donors who had reactive tests for Chagas. We wanted to see if the patterns in antibody levels matched up with the actual parasite in the blood.

What we found was pretty interesting. When we tested the blood donors using different methods, we noticed two groups: one group had high levels of antibodies, and the other had low levels. People with high levels seemed to have active infections, while those with low levels might have cleared the infection on their own. It’s like discovering that some students are still in the class while others graduated early.

This made us think: If someone has a low level of antibodies, maybe they’re on the road to recovery. We followed up with these donors over time to see if their antibody levels changed and whether they showed any health issues, like heart problems, which Chagas can sometimes cause.

How We Did the Study

We set up a plan. First, we pulled records from blood banks to find people with positive tests for Chagas. Then we had a team talk to these donors about joining our study. We made sure everything was done smoothly—from getting their consent to collecting samples.

Donors filled out a questionnaire about their exposure risks, and we took samples of their blood for testing. People who had been treated for Chagas in the past were not included, as we wanted to focus on new cases.

For follow-ups, we checked in with the same donors a few years later. We again collected blood for antibody testing and did heart tests (ECGs) to see if there were any issues.

Testing the Blood

We used four different commercial tests to look for antibodies against T. cruzi in the blood samples. These tests are pretty standard, so we were confident in their accuracy. Our local blood bank handled two of the tests, while another lab took care of the others.

In these tests, we measured the levels of antibodies using something called signal-to-cutoff ratios. This fancy term just means we were looking at how much of the antibody was in the blood compared to a set point.

As it turned out, most people tested positive for antibodies. A few didn’t, suggesting they might be false positives or had cleared the infection. We noticed a clear dividing line between donors with high antibody levels and those with low levels.

Looking at the Parasite

We also wanted to see if there was actually any parasite DNA in the blood, so we used a method called PCR (which stands for Polymerase Chain Reaction). Think of it like a detective using DNA testing to solve a case. By taking samples of blood and running them through this special test, we could see if the parasite was still hanging around.

The results were illuminating. Among those with high antibody levels, a significant number also tested positive for the parasite. But those with low antibody levels almost never had visible signs of the parasite in their blood.

How Antibody Levels Changed

After following the donors for some time, we noticed something surprising. Those who had low antibody levels tended to see those levels drop even further during follow-ups. This means they might have cleared the infection or controlled it well. Meanwhile, the group with high antibody levels didn’t show much change at all.

This is hopeful news for those thought to have low antibody levels. It could mean they’re on their way to being healthier without ongoing issues.

What About Heart Problems?

Chagas disease can sometimes mess with the heart, leading to conditions like Cardiomyopathy. In our donor group, heart problems were rare, but we did check to see if there was a connection between the antibody levels and any issues with their hearts.

Ultimately, we didn’t find a clear link. Given that the donors were relatively young and healthy, the lack of heart problems might not be surprising. It seems that, for many of them, Chagas wasn’t causing issues yet.

Takeaways from the Study

We confirmed that antibody levels in blood donors follow a bimodal distribution—meaning there are two distinct groups based on their test results. What’s more, we found a solid link between the antibody levels and actual parasite detection in blood.

This is exciting because it means doctors may have better ways to tell who needs treatment and who might be managing their health more effectively. By knowing how to classify people based on their antibody levels, we can help ensure they receive proper care.

Using threshold values from our tests could simplify the screening process for Chagas disease. In areas where resources are limited, this could be a game-changer.

Conclusion

Chagas disease might not be the most cheerful subject, but understanding it better helps pave the way for better diagnosis and treatment. Our study shines a light on how we can track the disease and offers hope for many.

In the end, it’s all about knowing when to take action and when to observe. Everyone loves a comeback story, and it seems that some folks might have the chance to tell theirs when it comes to Chagas disease. So, if you ever find yourself in a high-risk area, just remember: keep an eye out for those bugs and be sure to get checked out!

Original Source

Title: Bimodal distributions of anti-Trypanosoma cruzi antibody levels in blood donors are associated with parasite detection and antibody waning in peripheral blood.

Abstract: BackgroundIn our previous study of blood donors in the Argentinian Chaco Province, we documented bimodal distributions of anti-Trypanosoma cruzi antibody (Ab) levels, suggesting potential self-cure in donors with low-reactive samples. This study aimed to correlate "high" and "low" Ab level groups, defined by a mathematical model, with parasitemia and electrocardiogram findings. Ab decline over time was also assessed. Methodology / Principal FindingsWe invited T. cruzi Ab reactive blood donors to enroll in the study from October 2018 to November 2019 with a follow up visit two years later. Blood samples were tested for T cruzi Ab by: Chagatest ELISA Lisado and Chagatest ELISA Recombinante v.4.0 (Wiener Lab, Argentina); VITROS Immunodiagnostic Products Anti-T.cruzi (Chagas) (Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics Inc., UK), and Architect Chagas (Abbott Laboratories, Germany). Target capture PCR was performed on lysed whole blood samples from enrollment visits and electrocardiograms on second visits. Four hundred fifty donors were recruited, but 68 were excluded due to negative results on all study Ab assays. Ab level distributions were bimodal and classified as "high" or "low" at a calculated threshold for each of four assays. There were 160 donors with low and 179 with high Ab results on all assays. The remainder 43 were discordant reactive. Ninety-seven percentage of the PCR positive donors were among the concordant high Ab group. During the 2-4 year follow-up interval, relative Ab declines by three assays were significantly greater among those classified as low Ab and with negative PCR results. Conclusions / SignificanceAb reactivity is associated with PCR-detectable parasitemia. Greater Ab declines were detected among donors with low and/or discordant Ab reactivity and negative PCR results, suggesting spontaneous parasite clearance in these donors.

Authors: Mirta C. Remesar, Ester C. Sabino, Lewis F. Buss, Claudio D. Merlo, Mónica G. López, Sebastián L. Humeres, Pavón A. Héctor, C. Clara Di Germanio, Sonia Bakkour Coco, Léa C. Oliveira-da Silva, Marcelo Martins Pinto Filho, Antonio Luiz P. Ribeiro, Michael P. Busch, Ana E. del Pozo

Last Update: 2024-11-28 00:00:00

Language: English

Source URL: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.11.26.24317961

Source PDF: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.11.26.24317961.full.pdf

Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.

Thank you to medrxiv for use of its open access interoperability.

Similar Articles