Sci Simple

New Science Research Articles Everyday

# Biology # Ecology

Tackling Invasive Alien Species: A Global Challenge

A look at invasive species and how they threaten ecosystems worldwide.

Valén Holle, Anna Rönnfeldt, Katrin Schifferle, Juliano Sarmento Cabral, Dylan Craven, Tiffany Knight, Hanno Seebens, Patrick Weigelt, Damaris Zurell

― 8 min read


Invasive Species: The Invasive Species: The Hidden Threat urgent action needed now. Invasive species disrupt ecosystems;
Table of Contents

Invasive Alien Species are plants, animals, or other organisms that are not native to a specific ecosystem and can cause harm. They are like party crashers who show up uninvited and make a mess of things. These species can contribute to the loss of native biodiversity, which is the variety of life that belongs in an area. This loss can be bad for not just nature, but also for human health and the many benefits ecosystems provide us.

The problem of invasive alien species is not just a local issue; it's a global one. With the increase in trade and travel, the chances of these uninvited guests spreading are growing. It's as if borders are becoming more like revolving doors, letting in all sorts of organisms that can upset the balance of local wildlife. To tackle this issue, experts believe we urgently need smart strategies to prevent biological invasions.

The Need for a Strategic Approach

To effectively manage invasive species, we need to set priorities, especially when resources are limited. Think of it like budgeting for a big event: you want to make sure you get the best bang for your buck. This is where Blacklists come into play. Blacklists serve as a priority list, helping to identify which alien species pose a high risk of becoming invasive.

Creating these blacklists requires solid data on how likely it is for certain species to invade. It’s not enough just to say, "Hey, this species might be a problem." We need real numbers and assessments to back up those claims.

Tools of the Trade: Species Distribution Models

One of the best tools in our toolbox for managing invasive species is species distribution models (SDMs). Imagine SDMs as crystal balls that predict where invasive species might show up next. These models use data on where species have been found and link it to current environmental conditions to forecast potential distribution in new areas.

SDMs are relatively easy to use and benefit from the growing availability of data, which is great news for researchers. However, there are some bumps in the road. If these models are going to be helpful, we need to consider uncertainties that come from the methods we use and the data we rely on.

Various studies have shown that using different algorithms can lead to very different predictions, which is concerning, especially when trying to forecast what might happen in a changing world. It’s like trying to guess the weather using several different weather apps that all give conflicting reports—confusing and a little unnerving.

Addressing the Uncertainty

To make predictions more reliable, researchers propose using an ensemble modeling approach, which means taking into account multiple algorithms and combining their predictions. This way, we can capture a broader range of possible outcomes. However, we also need to be careful about the data we choose to include in these models.

For invading species, we need to use comprehensive data that reflects both their native and non-native occurrences. Native occurrences typically represent where a species is originally from, while global occurrences include places where the species has been introduced. This is crucial, as alien plants might behave differently in their new homes.

The Importance of Environmental Factors

In addition to species data, the Environmental Variables we consider also play a significant role in our models. Climate data is commonly used because it strongly influences where species can thrive. But for plants, soil characteristics—like pH levels or nitrogen content—can be just as important.

Interestingly, previous work has suggested that including soil properties in our models can improve predictions significantly. So, if we only look at climate data, we might miss some key factors affecting plant growth.

The Pacific Islands: A Unique Case Study

To better understand the uncertainties linked to SDMs and how they affect blacklisting invasive species, researchers focused on the Pacific Islands. This region is home to many unique species, some of which are already under threat from invasive species.

The Hawaiian Islands, in particular, have been hit hard, with a staggering number of alien plant species invading. Fortunately, many of these species have not yet spread to all parts of the Pacific, meaning there’s still time to act.

The Methodology: Crafting Blacklists

The researchers aimed to create blacklists of potentially invasive species across the Pacific Islands by using SDMs and assessing the uncertainty introduced by species input data, environmental variables, and model algorithms.

They began with a list of 122 plant species recognized as invasive in Hawaii. After filtering, they narrowed it down to 82 species that could potentially invade other Pacific Islands. The research team then collected species and environmental data while carefully considering how to assess the predictions produced by different algorithms.

Collecting Data

For the species data, the team looked at where the plants were native and where they had been introduced. They gathered data on the presence of these species by consulting databases and ensuring that the information was reliable.

Then came the environmental data collection. This involved looking at both climate data and soil characteristics. Researchers noted the importance of having a wide array of data to create better models.

Building the Models

With both species and environmental data in hand, the researchers got to work on fitting the SDMs using a mix of algorithms. They tested various models to see how accurately they predicted the presence of the invasive species.

Through cross-validation, they were able to judge how well their models performed. This involved comparing their results with actual occurrences to assess the quality of their predictions. Much like a student wanting to see how they did on a test, they scrutinized the performance of their models to ensure they were on the right track.

Evaluating Blacklists

Once the models were created, the next step was to construct blacklists based on predicted Habitat Suitability for the 82 invasive species. The researchers looked at three different approaches to creating these blacklists, providing a comprehensive overview of the potential risks.

Their findings revealed a significant variation in the rankings of species depending on the type of data and algorithms used. Some species that might have seemed harmless in one model suddenly emerged as high-ranking threats in another. This highlights the importance of being thorough and flexible when assessing potential invasives.

The Outcome: Learning from Uncertainty

The results of the study showed that the choice of modeling algorithms greatly influenced the rankings of invasive species. When more complex models were used, they tended to produce different predictions compared to simpler ones. This means creating a robust blacklist requires careful consideration of which algorithms to use.

The researchers also found that using global species data often resulted in higher predictions for suitable habitats. This suggests that some species may adapt and find new suitable spots in their non-native environments—not sticking to the niche they occupied back home.

The Final Blacklists and Colonization Potential

Blacklists were constructed based on predicted suitable habitats across the Pacific Islands, highlighting which species were at risk of becoming invasive. The researchers discovered that some species showed substantial shifts in rank, stressing the influence of the chosen data on these models.

The researchers also looked into unrealized colonization potential, examining how many island groups were predicted to have suitable habitats that had not yet been occupied by the species.

These insights are crucial for local conservation efforts and help guide management decisions about which species to target first—so we don’t end up with a party that’s too crowded with unwanted guests.

Limitations and Future Directions

While the study made significant strides in assessing invasive species risks, it wasn’t without its limitations. The models and data could always be improved, and future research will need to continually adjust to new findings and changes in the environment.

Moreover, there’s the challenge of keeping species lists updated. As new invasive species emerge, managers must adapt their strategies accordingly. It’s a bit like being a gardener—you have to keep an eye on the weeds before they take over.

Conclusion: A Call to Action

Invasive alien species pose a real threat to ecosystems worldwide, with the Pacific Islands being particularly vulnerable. As we gather more data and refine our models, we gain valuable insights into the risks posed by these species.

By using blacklists and understanding the uncertainties of our predictions, we can take steps to prevent the spread of these invasive species and protect our unique biodiversity. So, let’s be vigilant and ensure that the only guests at the ecological party are those who were invited to join in the fun!

Original Source

Title: Uncertainty in blacklisting potential Pacific plant invaders using species distribution models

Abstract: O_LIInvasive alien species pose a growing threat to global biodiversity, necessitating evidence-based prevention measures. Species distribution models (SDMs) are a useful tool for quantifying the potential distribution of alien species in non-native areas and deriving blacklists based on establishment risk. Yet, uncertainties due to different modelling decisions may affect predictive accuracy and the robustness of such blacklists. We thus aim to assess the relevance of three distinct sources of uncertainty in SDM-based blacklists: species data, environmental data and SDM algorithms. C_LIO_LIFocusing on 82 of the most invasive plant species on the Hawaiian Islands, we built SDMs to quantify their establishment potential in the Pacific region. We considered two different species datasets (native vs. global occurrences), two environmental predictor sets (climatic vs. edapho-climatic), and four different SDM algorithms. Based on SDM predictions, we derived blacklists using three distinct blacklisting definitions and quantified the variance in blacklist rankings associated with each source of uncertainty. C_LIO_LIOn average, SDMs showed fair predictive performance. SDM algorithm choice resulted in the largest variation in blacklist ranks while the relevance of species and environmental data was lower and varied across blacklist definitions. Nevertheless, using only native occurrences led to a clear underestimation of the establishment potential for certain species and to lower predictive performance, including high-ranking species on blacklists. C_LIO_LISDMs can serve as a robust decision support tool to plan preventive management strategies. To establish robust model-aided blacklists, we recommend ensemble models using multiple SDM algorithms that rely on global rather than native occurrences only. The relevance of environmental predictors additional to climate should be carefully considered and weighed against spatial coverage of those data to ensure sufficiently large sample sizes and predictive accuracy. We advocate for explicit assessment of uncertainty to increase confidence in blacklists and allow more reliable decision-making. C_LI

Authors: Valén Holle, Anna Rönnfeldt, Katrin Schifferle, Juliano Sarmento Cabral, Dylan Craven, Tiffany Knight, Hanno Seebens, Patrick Weigelt, Damaris Zurell

Last Update: 2024-12-13 00:00:00

Language: English

Source URL: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.12.11.627501

Source PDF: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.12.11.627501.full.pdf

Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.

Thank you to biorxiv for use of its open access interoperability.

Similar Articles