AI Transforming Embryo Selection in ART
Artificial intelligence is changing how embryos are selected for implantation.
Oriana Presacan, Alexandru Dorobantiu, Vajira Thambawita, Michael A. Riegler, Mette H. Stensen, Mario Iliceto, Alexandru C. Aldea, Akriti Sharma
― 5 min read
Table of Contents
- The Importance of Embryo Morphology
- Challenges with Data Availability
- The Role of AI in Embryology
- Generative Models: The Secret Sauce
- Creating a Synthetic Dataset
- Training AI Classification Models
- Qualitative Analysis: The Embryologist’s Touch
- Results and Findings
- Performance and Accuracy
- Feedback from Embryologists
- Conclusion
- Future Directions
- A Last Word
- Appendix: Datasets and Code
- Original Source
- Reference Links
In the world of assisted reproductive technology (ART), choosing the right embryo is like finding a needle in a haystack—except the needle is tiny and the haystack is full of Embryos. With many couples facing infertility challenges, figuring out which embryo to use for implantation is crucial. This is where artificial intelligence (AI) steps in to help. By using data to assess embryo quality, AI can make the selection process easier and more accurate.
The Importance of Embryo Morphology
The shape and development of embryos are essential indicators of their viability. Embryologists usually assess embryo morphology by looking at images and videos of their development. But human eyes can be subjective and sometimes miss the mark, leading to potential mistakes in embryo selection. With the advent of time-lapse imaging, embryologists now have a better view of embryo development without having to remove them from their stable environment.
Challenges with Data Availability
One major hurdle in improving embryo assessment is the limited availability of high-quality embryo data. Most ART studies do not share their data due to privacy concerns. Also, the existing data often focuses on small, specific datasets, making it difficult for researchers to form a broad understanding of embryo quality.
The Role of AI in Embryology
AI technology, especially deep learning, has gained popularity in various fields, including embryology. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and long short-term memory (LSTM) models are two common AI methods used to evaluate embryos. The implementation of such technology aims to eliminate some human bias and improve embryo selection outcomes.
Generative Models: The Secret Sauce
In light of data scarcity, two different generative models were used to create artificial embryo images for training purposes. These models can take existing data and generate new images that are very similar but not identical to the original ones. It’s a bit like a chef making a new dish by adding a twist to a classic recipe.
The two models used were:
-
Diffusion Model: This model starts with noise and gradually refines it into a recognizable image. Think of it as sculpting a statue from a block of marble—each chip brings the sculpture closer to the final form.
-
Generative Adversarial Network (GAN): This involves two networks, where one generates the images and the other evaluates them. It’s like a friendly competition where the generator tries to fool the critic into thinking its images are real.
Synthetic Dataset
Creating aTo tackle the challenge of data scarcity, a synthetic dataset containing thousands of embryo images was created using the diffusion model and GAN. High-quality images of embryos at different stages, such as 2-cell and 8-cell, were generated. These synthetic images were then combined with actual embryo images to train AI classification models.
Training AI Classification Models
Three different models were used to classify the embryos based on their stage of development—VGG, ResNet, and Vision Transformer (ViT). The aim was to see which model could best predict the embryo’s quality using a mix of real and synthetic images.
The models proved effective, with the VGG model delivering the best results. Regular evaluations were carried out to ensure that the models were learning to distinguish embryo stages accurately.
Qualitative Analysis: The Embryologist’s Touch
To assess the quality of the synthetic images, a small team of embryologists evaluated them using a web application that allowed them to decide whether each image was real or synthetic. This method was similar to a Turing test, where experts had to determine what was genuine and what was not. The embryologists offered their insights, indicating areas where the synthetic images seemed off, like that one friend who always has to comment on your hair.
Results and Findings
Performance and Accuracy
The results showed that synthetic images could effectively improve the classification performance of AI models. The VGG model, in particular, was able to achieve high accuracy of embryo stage classification, especially when trained with both synthetic and real data.
Interestingly, the images from the diffusion model were recognized as more realistic than those created by the GAN, highlighting that not all generative models are created equal—some are simply better at their jobs!
Feedback from Embryologists
During evaluations, embryologists noted that while they were generally good at identifying real embryos, they found synthetic images tricky. Some comments indicated that certain images looked too dark or had peculiar artifacts that made them suspect. Others felt that certain features, such as the zona pellucida (ZP), which is the outer layer of embryos, were not clearly visible, adding to their confusion.
Conclusion
This exciting study has shown that using synthetic images in embryo assessments can bridge the data gap and potentially improve embryo selection, making the process less subjective and more accurate. While there are still challenges to face, these advancements indicate a bright future for AI in the field of reproductive technology.
Future Directions
As the technology advances, further research can address the limitations identified in this study. More diverse data sources, including embryos that may not be viable, could enhance the training and performance of AI models. After all, just like in life, understanding the bad helps us appreciate the good.
A Last Word
So, the next time you hear about AI helping in the world of embryos, remember that it's not just about fancy algorithms—it's about making a difference in the lives of many hopeful parents. And who knows, maybe one day AI will be just as good at picking embryos as the best embryologist in the room—or at least better at picking out which ice cream flavor you would love!
Appendix: Datasets and Code
For those interested in diving deeper into the world of embryo data and AI, open-source datasets and code are available for public use. Researchers can now replicate these studies and perhaps experiment with their own twists on the recipes for embryo selection.
Original Source
Title: Embryo 2.0: Merging Synthetic and Real Data for Advanced AI Predictions
Abstract: Accurate embryo morphology assessment is essential in assisted reproductive technology for selecting the most viable embryo. Artificial intelligence has the potential to enhance this process. However, the limited availability of embryo data presents challenges for training deep learning models. To address this, we trained two generative models using two datasets, one we created and made publicly available, and one existing public dataset, to generate synthetic embryo images at various cell stages, including 2-cell, 4-cell, 8-cell, morula, and blastocyst. These were combined with real images to train classification models for embryo cell stage prediction. Our results demonstrate that incorporating synthetic images alongside real data improved classification performance, with the model achieving 97% accuracy compared to 95% when trained solely on real data. Notably, even when trained exclusively on synthetic data and tested on real data, the model achieved a high accuracy of 94%. Furthermore, combining synthetic data from both generative models yielded better classification results than using data from a single generative model. Four embryologists evaluated the fidelity of the synthetic images through a Turing test, during which they annotated inaccuracies and offered feedback. The analysis showed the diffusion model outperformed the generative adversarial network model, deceiving embryologists 66.6% versus 25.3% and achieving lower Frechet inception distance scores.
Authors: Oriana Presacan, Alexandru Dorobantiu, Vajira Thambawita, Michael A. Riegler, Mette H. Stensen, Mario Iliceto, Alexandru C. Aldea, Akriti Sharma
Last Update: 2024-12-02 00:00:00
Language: English
Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.01255
Source PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.01255
Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.
Thank you to arxiv for use of its open access interoperability.
Reference Links
- https://zenodo.org/records/14253170
- https://huggingface.co/datasets/deepsynthbody/synembryo_latentdiffusion
- https://huggingface.co/datasets/deepsynthbody/synembryo_stylegan
- https://huggingface.co/deepsynthbody/synembryo_ldm
- https://huggingface.co/deepsynthbody/synembryo_stylegan
- https://github.com/orianapresacan/EmbryoStageGen
- https://zenodo.org/records/6390798