Temperature Monitoring in HIPEC: A Study
This study examines temperature monitoring methods during HIPEC and their implications.
Jung–Won Kim, Jin Ho Kim, Soojeong Oh, So Woon Ahn
― 6 min read
Table of Contents
- The Role of Temperature in HIPEC
- How Our Bodies Manage Temperature
- Monitoring Temperature: Why It Matters
- Study Setup
- How We Measured Temperature
- Analyzing the Results
- Temperature Trends During HIPEC
- Why Temperature Monitoring is Key
- Post-Surgery Observations
- Conclusion
- Original Source
- Reference Links
Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a special kind of treatment used for patients with cancer that has spread in the abdominal area. Instead of just using regular chemotherapy, HIPEC delivers heated chemotherapy directly into the body's abdominal cavity. This approach has shown patients can live longer when compared to traditional methods that only help with symptoms.
The Role of Temperature in HIPEC
Temperature plays a big part in how the body reacts during HIPEC. When the body gets heated, the heart starts to beat faster, and there can be changes in the levels of gases in the body, like carbon dioxide. This increase in temperature can also lead to some changes in how our bodies work, which is why medical professionals pay attention to it.
Interestingly, research has found that even a slight rise in body temperature can mess with memory. When healthy people were heated up to just below 39 °C (about 102.2 °F), they struggled to remember things compared to when their bodies were at normal temperature. It seems that the brain is quite sensitive to temperature changes!
How Our Bodies Manage Temperature
Our bodies are not always at the same temperature all over. There can be a difference of a few degrees between the core (center) temperature and the surface temperature. Normally, when the outside temperature changes, our bodies have tricks up their sleeves to keep things balanced. However, during quick changes, like cooling off or warming up, this balance can shift.
During major Surgeries that involve removing a lot of cancer tissue, patients usually cool down. But once the heated chemotherapy is introduced, Temperatures can shoot back up. This sudden change means careful temperature monitoring is crucial to keep everything under control.
Monitoring Temperature: Why It Matters
Accurate temperature monitoring throughout HIPEC is essential. There are several ways to check temperature. The best and most accurate way is through a special tube placed in the pulmonary artery. However, this method can be quite invasive. This is why doctors sometimes use other methods like probes in the esophagus or nasopharynx (the area behind the nose), as well as skin-based thermometers.
In our study, we wanted to find out how effective the Nasopharyngeal temperature monitoring was compared to these other methods during HIPEC with additional surgery to remove cancer.
Study Setup
Before starting the study, we got the green light from the hospital’s ethics committee. We also obtained written consent from all patients to participate. Between July 2019 and December 2022, we gathered data from patients who had this surgery along with HIPEC.
We included 41 patients who met specific conditions and removed others who weren't suitable for these temperature monitoring techniques. All patients received the same kind of anesthesia during their procedures.
How We Measured Temperature
During the surgeries, we measured temperatures in different areas. The skin temperature was assessed on the forehead with a special sensor, while the nasopharyngeal temperature was checked with a probe. Another measurement came from an esophageal probe that was placed in the esophagus right after patients were put under anesthesia.
All these temperature readings were taken every five minutes throughout the surgery. We then looked at the differences in the temperature readings between these areas to see how close they were.
Analyzing the Results
To see how well the nasopharyngeal readings matched with the other methods, we ran some clever analyses. We wanted to find out if the differences were acceptable. We set a limit of half a degree Celsius (0.5 °C) as the maximum acceptable difference.
In our findings, the average difference between nasopharyngeal temperature and forehead readings was quite small, about -0.04 °C. This means they were fairly well aligned! However, when we looked at the proportion of measurements that fell within our agreed limit, only a small number of them did.
The nasopharyngeal and esophageal temperatures also had a similar story with a tiny difference of about 0.02 °C. Again, not too bad!
Temperature Trends During HIPEC
While analyzing the data, we noticed how temperature changed during different times of the operation. Before, during, and after HIPEC, we checked the agreement between temperature readings. Overall, our findings indicated a strong connection between nasopharyngeal, forehead, and esophageal temperatures during the entire surgery.
However, we did see some interesting fluctuations. After HIPEC, temperatures increased across all measurement sites, particularly in the nasopharyngeal and forehead areas. This rebound heating could potentially lead to issues for the patient as their body adjusts.
Why Temperature Monitoring is Key
Choosing where to monitor temperature during HIPEC is very important. The goal is to get a reliable reading to manage the patient’s condition effectively. Since the temperature in the brain closely relates to nasopharyngeal temperature, it makes sense to monitor it there.
The forehead thermometer is also an option, though it can sometimes give misleading readings. It’s been noted in other studies that the forehead measurements can differ by about 1 °C from the core temperature, which is significant.
Our results showed that even during rapid temperature changes, nasopharyngeal temperature and forehead measurements maintained a good correlation. The esophageal readings also did well, but they sometimes didn’t align perfectly with the others.
Post-Surgery Observations
Another point of interest was that after the HIPEC procedure, temperatures dropped quickly, followed by a sudden rise. This could be a concern, as rapid temperature changes can put stress on the heart and blood vessels.
While studying these changes, we noticed the esophageal temperature often reflected that of the abdominal cavity, showing different behavior during surgery. This means we need to be vigilant when managing temperature changes during and after surgery.
Conclusion
In summary, our study found strong connections between nasopharyngeal, forehead, and esophageal temperature readings during HIPEC with surgical treatment. However, there were noticeable differences that could lead to complications. Monitoring temperature effectively in these situations is vital, as temperature changes can affect patient outcomes significantly.
Being aware of how temperature impacts surgical procedures helps healthcare providers take better care of patients. It’s a serious business, but sometimes it's a little like a delicate dance where everyone must stay in sync to keep things running smoothly. After all, no one wants an unexpected temperature surprise!
Original Source
Title: A comparison of core temperature at different sites during cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: A prospective observational study
Abstract: BackgroundDuring cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, body temperature rapidly changes due to the hyperthermic agent. Depending on the method used, obtained values may vary, particularly during localized heating of the abdominal cavity. The primary aim of our study was to compare the effectiveness of core temperature monitoring techniques, nasopharyngeal temperature, zero-heat flux cutaneous thermometer device, and esophageal temperature, during hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy with cytoreductive surgery. MethodsBody temperature was measured using a zero-heat flux cutaneous thermometer device on the forehead and esophageal and nasopharyngeal probes throughout the surgery. Temperature differences were then calculated for each pair of measurements. We conducted an agreement analysis between the nasopharyngeal temperature and reference core temperature measurements using the 95% Bland-Altman limits of agreement for repeated measurement data. The proportion of all differences that were within 0.5 {degrees}C and repeated measures Lins concordance correlation coefficient were estimated. ResultsThe mean overall difference between nasopharyngeal and forehead temperature was -0.04 {+/-} 0.33 {degrees}C (95% limits of agreement: -0.69-0.62), and esophageal temperature was 0.02 {+/-} 0.35{degrees}C (95% limits of agreement: -0.66-0.71). The proportion of differences within 0.5 {degrees}C of TSpotOn was 0.03 (95% CI 0.01-0.04) and that of esophageal temperature was -0.06 (95% CI -0.08 to -0.05). The Lins concordance correlation coefficient of both were 0.94 (95% CI 0.93-0.94). After the hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy period, the temperatures rapidly decreased, followed by a noticeable rebound increase, particularly nasopharyngeal and forehead temperatures. The maximum difference between esophageal temperature and other temperatures was 1.5 {degrees}C. ConclusionsOur results reveal a strong correlation between nasopharyngeal, zero-heat flux cutaneous, and esophageal temperatures during surgery. However, consistent temperature differences with the esophageal thermometer were not observed. Post-hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, rebound heating occurred at all sites, notably in the nasopharyngeal and zero-heat flux cutaneous areas.
Authors: Jung–Won Kim, Jin Ho Kim, Soojeong Oh, So Woon Ahn
Last Update: 2024-11-29 00:00:00
Language: English
Source URL: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.11.27.24318051
Source PDF: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.11.27.24318051.full.pdf
Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.
Thank you to medrxiv for use of its open access interoperability.