Sci Simple

New Science Research Articles Everyday

# Computer Science # Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Revolutionizing Parking Lot Mapping with Technology

Using satellite images and models to identify parking lots efficiently.

Shirin Qiam, Saipraneeth Devunuri, Lewis J. Lehe

― 6 min read


Smart Parking Lot Mapping Smart Parking Lot Mapping space maps. Advanced tech creates efficient parking
Table of Contents

Parking lots are everywhere, but mapping them can be a bit tricky. It's not like drawing a doodle of your cat; it takes time and a lot of effort. Many cities have "minimum parking requirements," which means they have to provide a certain number of parking spaces for new buildings. But who really wants to spend hours creating maps of parking lots when you can simply use technology? This is where satellite images and some clever computer models come into play.

The Problem with Parking Lot Mapping

Creating detailed maps of parking lots can be a pain. Some companies sell this data, but most of it is not open for anyone to use. This can lead to gaps in information about where parking spaces are. If cities want to make smart decisions about parking requirements, they need accurate maps. So, we need a better way to get this information.

A New Approach

This study proposes a solution: using satellite images and advanced computer models to automatically identify parking lots. Imagine smart cameras in the sky that take pictures of the ground and tell us where all the parking spaces are. Using these high-tech images and a technique called "Semantic Segmentation," we can tell the difference between parking spaces and everything else around them.

What is Semantic Segmentation?

Semantic segmentation is just a fancy way of saying "dividing an image into different parts." In this case, we want to label each pixel as either "parking" or "not parking." It's like sorting your jellybeans by color, but instead, we are sorting pixels by their function.

Using Satellite Images

We collected a large set of satellite images from various U.S. cities. This dataset has over 12,000 images, and each image is accompanied by a mask that shows where the parking lots are located. Think of the mask as a coloring book page that highlights the parking lot outlines.

The Benefits of Near-infrared (NIR)

To make the process even better, we added a layer of data called Near-Infrared (NIR). This is a special kind of imaging that helps us see things that our regular eyes can't. Vegetation, for example, reflects a lot of NIR, which helps separate parking lots from nearby grass. So, while our regular images show what we see, the NIR gives us some extra sight, like superhero vision.

Deep Learning Models

Now that we have our images, we need to train some brainy models to understand them. We used five different deep learning models for this task. These models are like recipe books that tell computers how to recognize patterns in images. They all have different ingredients and methods, so we wanted to see which one would cook up the best results for our parking lot segmentation task.

The Five Models

  1. Fully Convolutional Networks (FCNs): The classic chef in the kitchen. They take a regular dish and make it fully convolutional, which means they can output results for every pixel.

  2. DeepLabV3: This model is like the ambitious chef trying to make a multi-course meal. It learns from different scales of the images to catch all the details.

  3. SegFormer: A brave new addition to our kitchen, combining the strengths of the old-school methods and newer transformers. It mixes local details with global context to make recommendations.

  4. Mask2Former: This one focuses on masking attention where it matters most. It’s like that friend who knows what you want to eat and jumps right to it.

  5. OneFormer: A multitasking superstar, working hard to handle different types of segmentation tasks at once.

Training the Models

To teach these models how to recognize parking lots, we split the data into training and test sets. Think of the training set as practice sessions where the models learn, and the test set is the final exam where we see if they really know their stuff.

Setting Training Parameters

We set certain guidelines for the training process, like a team of focused chefs following a recipe. These guidelines included how fast to learn and how to measure success. The models had to maintain a balance between accuracy and complexity while avoiding mistakes like mistaking a building for a parking lot.

Post-Processing Magic

After the models made their predictions, they weren't perfect. They needed a bit of polish—like a car that needs a shiny wax job. We introduced some post-processing steps to clean up the predictions and make the edges look neater.

Removing Holes

Sometimes, the models made mistakes and left little holes in the masks where they thought there was parking. We decided to get rid of any holes that were too small because they were usually wrong. It’s like cleaning your house and tossing out the crumbs that no one would notice.

Simplifying Edges

The edges produced by the models could be rough and jagged. We wanted them to look smooth and tidy, so we used special tools to simplify these edges. It’s like taking a messy drawing and making it look clean and clear.

Removing Buildings

Buildings can look a lot like parking lots, and sometimes the models got confused. To fix this, we used a dataset that specifically shows where buildings are located and subtracted those areas from our predictions. It’s like keeping your home-cooked meal free from unwanted ingredients.

Removing Roads

Roads can also be mistaken for parking spaces. We created buffers around roads to exclude those areas from our predictions. Just imagine shaping your meal to keep out the distractions and make room for the actual dish you want to eat.

Model Performance

Once the post-processing steps were complete, we checked how well each of the models performed. We measured their success using terms that sound fancy but are quite simple: pixel-wise accuracy and mean Intersection over Union (mIoU).

Results

After all the training and polishing, OneFormer took the cake! It outperformed the other models with impressive accuracy rates. Who knew segmenting parking lots could make you feel like a star chef?

The Role of NIR

Adding the NIR channel made a real difference in the models' performance. It helped the models separate grassy areas from parking lots better than before. The results showed that, when combining NIR with regular images, the models performed even better.

Conclusion

In the end, we set out to create a system that could automatically identify parking lots using satellite images and advanced computer models. We used a combination of RGB and NIR images, applied various post-processing techniques, and trained several deep learning models to find the best outcomes.

Who would have thought that a little technology could lead to better maps for parking lots? This new approach not only saves time but also helps cities make informed decisions about parking requirements.

So, next time you pull into a parking lot, remember that there might be a whole tech world working behind the scenes to keep track of those spaces. And who knows, maybe the next time cities decide to rethink minimum parking requirements, they’ll have a solid set of maps thanks to these smart systems.

Original Source

Title: A Pipeline and NIR-Enhanced Dataset for Parking Lot Segmentation

Abstract: Discussions of minimum parking requirement policies often include maps of parking lots, which are time consuming to construct manually. Open source datasets for such parking lots are scarce, particularly for US cities. This paper introduces the idea of using Near-Infrared (NIR) channels as input and several post-processing techniques to improve the prediction of off-street surface parking lots using satellite imagery. We constructed two datasets with 12,617 image-mask pairs each: one with 3-channel (RGB) and another with 4-channel (RGB + NIR). The datasets were used to train five deep learning models (OneFormer, Mask2Former, SegFormer, DeepLabV3, and FCN) for semantic segmentation, classifying images to differentiate between parking and non-parking pixels. Our results demonstrate that the NIR channel improved accuracy because parking lots are often surrounded by grass, even though the NIR channel needed to be upsampled from a lower resolution. Post-processing including eliminating erroneous holes, simplifying edges, and removing road and building footprints further improved the accuracy. Best model, OneFormer trained on 4-channel input and paired with post-processing techniques achieves a mean Intersection over Union (mIoU) of 84.9 percent and a pixel-wise accuracy of 96.3 percent.

Authors: Shirin Qiam, Saipraneeth Devunuri, Lewis J. Lehe

Last Update: 2024-12-08 00:00:00

Language: English

Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.13179

Source PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.13179

Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.

Thank you to arxiv for use of its open access interoperability.

More from authors

Similar Articles