Sci Simple

New Science Research Articles Everyday

# Biology # Neuroscience

Understanding the Sense of Agency

Discover how our perception of control shapes our actions and outcomes.

Christopher M. Hill, Numa Samnani, Leo Barzi, Matt Wilson

― 7 min read


Agency: Control Over Agency: Control Over Actions sense of control. Explore how feedback influences our
Table of Contents

When we do something on purpose, like waving hello or turning off the lights, we feel a sense of ownership over that action. This feeling is known as the "Sense Of Agency." It's the sensation that we are in charge and that our actions have an impact. Think of it as the mental high-five you give yourself when you hit the snooze button—yes, you did that!

This sensation is quite significant in how we think about free will and consciousness. Researchers have been busy studying this idea, especially when it comes to mental health issues. For example, people with certain psychiatric or neurological disorders might experience changes in their sense of agency. It’s as if someone turned down the volume on their inner voice of control, and that can mess with how they perceive their actions and their outcomes.

Measuring Sense of Agency

One common way to gauge our sense of agency is through something called "intentional binding." This term refers to our sense of timing regarding our actions and their consequences. When we do something voluntarily, like pressing a button, and hear a sound afterward, we often feel that the action and the sound are closer together in time than they actually are. However, if the action is involuntary, such as someone else pressing the button, we perceive the timing differently. This Temporal Perception is like trying to guess how long it takes to microwave popcorn — sometimes it feels longer than it actually is, especially if you’re really hungry!

Scientists often set up experiments where participants judge the time between their action and an outcome, like a sound. By measuring these judgments, researchers can learn more about how agency works. But the results have been a bit mixed, leaving researchers scratching their heads. Sometimes, negative outcomes lead to a stronger sense of agency, while other times they do not seem to matter at all. It’s like trying to figure out if you work better with coffee or tea—results may vary from person to person.

The Role of Reinforcement Feedback

Reinforcement feedback is another interesting piece of the puzzle. This is when we receive information about our actions, either as a reward for doing well or a punishment for messing up. Think of it as your boss saying, "Great job!" or "Try harder next time." It influences how we relate our actions to the results that follow.

Rewards and punishments can shape our behavior significantly. For instance, if you get a cookie for cleaning your room, you’re more likely to do it again. But if you get nagged for not doing your homework, you might avoid that subject altogether!

Although we know reinforcement feedback influences behavior, its specific effects on the sense of agency have not been studied as much. One recent look into this topic showed that when people received feedback about their timing accuracy—think of how close they were to hitting a target—their sense of agency changed. Basically, better timing meant they felt less agency in that task, which is kind of like realizing you’re still not great at juggling after all this time!

The Brain and Event-Related Potentials

Neurologists often use a tool called electroencephalography (EEG) to look at brain activity during these tasks. This technique measures the electrical signals produced by our brain and can help us understand how we process actions and their outcomes.

When participants receive feedback on their actions, certain brain signals called event-related potentials (ERPs) show how we monitor outcomes. It’s kind of like watching the score of a game tick up on the scoreboard. Specific peaks in these signals occur after events and reveal how we process different aspects of feedback, like how significant or urgent the information is.

For instance, two main types of ERPs might show varying responses when participants receive rewards compared to punishments. Generally, punishment tends to generate a larger reaction in the brain, especially when individuals are actively engaged in the task. This means that when you get a thumbs down instead of a thumbs up, your brain is likely putting in more effort to process that disappointing feedback.

What Happens During Feedback?

In studies, individuals engaged in tasks where they estimated intervals—like figuring out how long between a button press and a tone—while receiving different types of feedback. Some participants received rewarding feedback (like a green light for getting it right), while others encountered punishment feedback (like a red light for getting it wrong).

Interestingly, when comparing the excitement of getting it right (reward) and the dread of getting it wrong (punishment), punishment feedback seemed to generate a stronger connection between their actions and the outcomes. It was as if fear was a better motivator than a cookie!

The Experimental Setup

In a recent experiment, researchers gathered a group of young adults and had them sit in front of a computer, engaging in tasks designed to measure their sense of agency. They had to press a button to trigger sounds and then estimate the time between their action and the sound. In short, they were supposed to hit the button, hear a tone, and guess how long it took for that tone to play.

To make it more interesting, the researchers gave participants different types of feedback based on their accuracy in estimating the intervals. Depending on the group they were assigned to, participants felt rewarded or punished based on how close their estimates were to the actual time. Meanwhile, the control group received neutral feedback, which made it feel like their feedback was as exciting as watching paint dry.

Key Findings

Temporal Judgements and Action Types

The research provided some intriguing insights about how well people estimated time based on whether they pressed the button themselves or watched someone else do it. As anticipated, people struggled more with longer time intervals. In fact, they were particularly wobbly on their estimates when they were simply observing another person perform the action. It’s similar to when you’re trying to guess how long it takes a buddy to make a sandwich instead of doing it yourself—you might think it took them forever when they were only gone for five minutes!

Intentional Binding and Feedback Type

The results revealed that punishment feedback increased the sense of agency or intentional binding more than reward feedback. It was as if getting scolded helped people feel that their actions had a stronger connection to the outcome, while receiving positive reinforcement didn’t have the same energetic kick. It’s like knowing that you need to avoid the broccoli after dinner because it leads to a stern lecture from Mom, as opposed to the sweet benefits of dessert for cleaning your plate!

Brain Activity and Feedback

When the researchers looked at brain activity during the tasks, they noticed that different kinds of feedback affected the brain’s response patterns. For example, punishment feedback raised the amplitude of certain brain signals, meaning more brain activity when it came to processing those negative signals.

Interestingly, participants who received punishment feedback showed larger brain responses compared to their peers who received rewarding or neutral feedback. During action tasks, those who faced punishment seemed to pay more attention to their errors, which likely heightened their sense of agency over their actions.

Conclusion

In summary, this research shows that our sense of agency is significant in how we experience our actions and their consequences. While we often feel in control of our choices, various factors—including the types of feedback we receive—can mess with that perception. Punishments might be harsh, but they can offer a stronger sense of connection between what we do and what happens afterward, while rewards might not create the same level of awareness.

Understanding these dynamics is useful for many fields, including psychology and neuroscience. It could also shed light on why some people struggle with their sense of control in everyday situations, especially in those dealing with various mental health issues.

So, the next time you hit that snooze button, remember: the struggle for agency is real, and sometimes that alarm clock feels like the tiniest invader in your kingdom of comfy sheets!

Original Source

Title: Punishing temporal judgement boosts sense of agency and modulates its underlying neural correlates

Abstract: Feeling in control of ones actions is fundamental to the formation of action-outcome relationships. Reinforcement and its valence also change the action-outcome relationship, either through behavior promotion or diminishment. In this study we evaluated how reward and punishment reinforcement modulate sense of agency, as measured by intentional binding. Moreover, using electroencephalography (EEG) we evaluated how reward and punishment reinforcement changes outcome event related potentials associated with the accuracy of participants judgement of the time interval between a key press and audio tone. We found that punishment reinforcement increased intentional binding between the action and outcome more than reward and control feedback. This was also reflected in the outcome event related potentials, where punishment elicited greater P300s and Late Positive Potentials compared to reward and control. We also found increased N100s and diminished P300s and Late Positive Potentials when the participants did not actively participate in evoking the tone. Taken together, our findings showcase that punishment reinforcement boosts sense of agency and modulates associated neural activity more than reward and no reinforcement, as a function of increasing attention and arousal. These findings illuminate the greater effect punishment reinforcement has on behavior and brain activity by its modification of sense of agency, which is important for the development of treatments in psychiatric and neurological diseases.

Authors: Christopher M. Hill, Numa Samnani, Leo Barzi, Matt Wilson

Last Update: 2024-12-16 00:00:00

Language: English

Source URL: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.12.12.628000

Source PDF: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.12.12.628000.full.pdf

Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.

Thank you to biorxiv for use of its open access interoperability.

Similar Articles