Radiology Trends in Emergency Departments
Patient admissions rise, but imaging tests don't follow suit.
Ndiaw Goumballa, Fabien de Oliveira, Fabien Coisy, Jean Goupil, Julien Frandon, Florence Longueville, Catherine Daladouire, Romain Genre Grandpierre, Jean Paul Beregi
― 5 min read
Table of Contents
In recent years, the number of radiological exams, like CT and MRI Scans, in emergency departments has gone up. This trend has been seen in many hospitals around the world, including a university hospital in France. The rise in imaging tests is partly due to more patients coming into emergency departments, which act as a crucial link between outpatient care and hospital stays.
The Role of Emergency Departments
Emergency departments (EDs) are busy places that provide immediate care to patients. People can visit the ED without an appointment when they feel unwell or when they think they might need quick medical help. This can range from a minor injury to a serious condition. In busy EDs, doctors often need to order tests, including radiological exams, to figure out what’s going on with a patient.
What Did the Study Find?
A study looked at radiological examination activities over ten years in a French university hospital's ED. They focused on four main types of imaging: CT Scans, MRI scans, ultrasound (US), and X-rays. This investigation ran from 2014 to 2023 and aimed to see how the use of these tests changed over the years.
The study found that the number of patients coming into the ED jumped from about 71,776 in 2014 to 103,456 in 2023. However, there was a significant drop in admissions in 2020, possibly due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite the increase in patients, the ratio of radiological exams to those admitted actually went down, showing that maybe not everyone needed imaging tests after all.
The Rise of Different Imaging Types
When looking at the types of scans used:
-
MRI Scans: The number of MRIs rose by more than 80% from 2014 to 2023. This growth mostly happened in the earlier years of the study, then plateaued, with a small dip in 2020.
-
CT Scans: These scans saw an impressive increase of about 111.7% between 2014 and 2022, though the number stabilized somewhat in 2023.
-
Ultrasounds: The use of ultrasounds didn’t change much over the years, remaining relatively stable, although there was a slight peak in 2018.
-
X-Rays: Usage of X-rays stayed steady in the years before 2020 but saw a significant drop during the pandemic, with a slight recovery noted by 2023.
Who is Getting These Tests?
The study also examined the characteristics of the patients who underwent these imaging tests. It turned out:
- Males were more likely to have CT and X-ray exams, while females were represented more in the MRI and ultrasound groups.
- Older patients, especially those over 70, were more likely to get CT and MRI scans.
- Younger patients under the age of 20 accounted for most of the ultrasound and X-ray examinations.
Interestingly, the average age of patients receiving CT and MRI scans increased over the years, while the age for those getting X-rays and ultrasounds went down.
What Does All This Mean?
The findings revealed an interesting trend: even though more patients are being admitted to emergency departments, the number of imaging exams per patient has decreased. This could be due to several reasons.
First, many patients might come in with issues that don't require imaging tests. Secondly, some patients might present with conditions that are less severe, resulting in fewer necessary scans. Lastly, there’s been a concerted effort between emergency doctors and radiologists to make sure patients get the right tests. They meet regularly to discuss best practices, training, and the use of new technology.
The Impact of COVID-19
COVID-19 had a significant impact on patient admissions and testing patterns. The pandemic led to a notable drop in ED visits and, thus, fewer imaging procedures. People were understandably hesitant to visit hospitals during this time. However, the need for imaging to diagnose conditions related to COVID-19 also brought some changes in the way these tests were utilized in emergency settings.
The Future of Radiology in Emergency Departments
As medicine continues to evolve, so does the role of imaging in emergency departments. The use of artificial intelligence tools in radiology is becoming more prominent. These technologies could help improve how imaging tests are managed, prioritized, and interpreted, making it easier for doctors to make quick decisions about patient care.
There's also a growing awareness of the benefits of lower-dose imaging techniques, which reduce the amount of radiation a patient is exposed to while still providing necessary images. People are becoming more educated about these advancements, which could influence future testing practices.
Limitations of the Findings
While the study offers valuable insights, it's essential to recognize its limitations. The data came only from one hospital, meaning it might not reflect practices in other emergency departments across France or elsewhere. Plus, there could be issues with missing or incorrect data in the system they used.
To get a clearer and more comprehensive view, researchers suggest that a larger, multicenter study would be beneficial. This approach could help gather more representative data and better understand the trends in emergency radiology as a whole.
Conclusion
Overall, the increase in patient admissions to emergency departments has not matched the increase in imaging tests like CT and MRI scans. The reasons behind this shift are complex and call for more investigation. With ongoing changes in healthcare and technology, the future for radiological examinations in emergency settings holds much promise, aiming to improve patient care without unnecessary tests.
So, if you ever find yourself in an emergency department, remember that while they might check your heartbeat and blood pressure, they also have a whole arsenal of imaging tests ready to help them get to the bottom of your issue—just don't forget to ask if they'll be handing you a superhero cape along with that MRI!
Original Source
Title: A Decade of Radiological Examinations in the Emergency Department: A Monocentric Retrospective Observational Study
Abstract: PurposeTo analyze the evolution of various radiological examinations requested for patients admitted to the emergency department (ED) of a University Hospital. Materials and MethodsWe analyzed data on MRI, CT scan, Ultrasound (US), and X-ray activities, along with ED patient admissions over a ten-year period from 2014 to 2023. The patient data for each modality, categorized by age and sex, were extracted from the Radiological Information System database. ResultsThe number of patients undergoing radiological examinations increased from 35,532 in 2014 to 44,592 in 2023, marking a 25.9% increase, while the number of ED admissions rose from 71,776 to 103,456, a 44.1% increase. The ratio of radiological examinations to ED admissions decreased from 49.5% in 2014 to 43.1% in 2023. Over the study period, the number of patients receiving MRI and CT scans increased by 80.4% and 105.8%, respectively. The number of patients undergoing ultrasound remained relatively stable, with 2,616 in 2014 and 2,432 in 2023. In contrast, the number of X-ray patients decreased by 33.1% from 22,236 in 2014 to 14,847 in 2020 but rebounded to 20,492 in 2023. Male patients more frequently underwent CT (51.7%) and X-ray examinations (53.3%). ConclusionThis study highlights a significant increase in radiological activity within the emergency department, especially in CT scans and MRI usage over the ten-year period while ultrasound examinations stayed flat, accompanied by a decline in the ratio of radiological examinations to ED admissions.
Authors: Ndiaw Goumballa, Fabien de Oliveira, Fabien Coisy, Jean Goupil, Julien Frandon, Florence Longueville, Catherine Daladouire, Romain Genre Grandpierre, Jean Paul Beregi
Last Update: 2024-12-05 00:00:00
Language: English
Source URL: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.12.04.24318507
Source PDF: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.12.04.24318507.full.pdf
Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.
Thank you to medrxiv for use of its open access interoperability.