Sci Simple

New Science Research Articles Everyday

# Computer Science # Information Retrieval # Machine Learning

Position Bias in Online Shopping: A Hidden Challenge

Learn how position bias affects your online shopping experience.

Andrii Dzhoha, Alexey Kurennoy, Vladimir Vlasov, Marjan Celikik

― 7 min read


Tackling Position Bias in Tackling Position Bias in Shopping online shopping. Overcome position bias for fairer
Table of Contents

In the world of online shopping, everybody wants to find that perfect pair of shoes or the hottest gadget at the best price. But there’s a sneaky little thing called Position Bias that can make finding what you want feel like finding a needle in a haystack. This bias happens when the items ranked higher on a page get more attention just because they are at the top. It’s like a popular kid in school who seems to get all the friends, while the quieter kids get overlooked, even if they have incredible stories to share.

What Is Position Bias?

Position bias is the idea that people are more likely to engage with items or information that are placed in more visible positions. Imagine scrolling through a list of products on a shopping site; chances are, you’ll notice and click on the first few items before scrolling down to check out the others at the bottom. This leads to popular items becoming more popular because they get seen more often. It’s a bit like a snowball rolling downhill—once it starts, it just keeps getting bigger and bigger.

The Impact of Position Bias on E-commerce

In the e-commerce landscape, position bias can cause a lopsided effect. If the same items always appear at the top of the list, they receive all the love and attention, while other equally great items sit in obscurity, slowly gathering dust. It’s not just customers who lose out, but businesses too, as they might miss the chance to show off their full range of products. So, how can we even the playing field and give those overlooked items a fighting chance?

The Feedback Loop

To make matters worse, position bias creates a feedback loop. This is a fancy way of saying that when an item gets clicks and attention, its popularity rises. As it climbs up the popularity ladder, it gets even more visibility, which leads to even more clicks. It’s like a hamster wheel: it keeps spinning and spinning, and the same items keep getting prioritization while others are left in the dust. This loop can create a situation where items on the lower ranks are hardly seen at all.

The Solution: Position Debiasing

Enter position debiasing, the superhero we didn’t know we needed! Position debiasing is the practice of adjusting how items are ranked so that those previously hidden treasures get their moment in the spotlight. By tweaking the way we present items, it’s possible to give every product a fair shot. This not only benefits customers, who are now able to discover more items that are relevant to them, but also businesses that can showcase their entire range effectively. It’s a win-win situation!

How Does Position Debiasing Work?

Position debiasing employs a variety of methods to counteract the effects of position bias. The idea is to change how the ranking model works, by incorporating positional information as a feature during training. In simpler terms, it’s like telling the model, “Hey, don’t just pay attention to popular items; look at the whole picture!” This allows the system to recognize that just because an item is at the bottom of the list doesn’t mean it’s not worth checking out.

By modeling position as a feature, we can train the algorithm to distribute attention more evenly across items. This way, shoppers can find hidden gems that they wouldn’t typically see and explore a wider variety of options. It’s all about giving the underdogs an opportunity to shine!

Experiments and Results: The Proof is in the Pudding

To see if position debiasing really works, researchers conducted a series of experiments on an e-commerce platform. They took a massive dataset that included millions of customers and their shopping habits and split it into training and testing parts. Then, they applied position-aware learning to the existing ranking models.

The results were indeed promising! They noticed that while the effectiveness of ranking in terms of relevance didn’t change much, there was a notable improvement in the average recommendation popularity. This means that more items were getting clicks, which helped to distribute attention more evenly across the assortment, like a generous serving of cake at a party that everyone gets to enjoy.

Metrics Used to Measure Success

To evaluate the success of position debiasing, researchers employed a few key metrics:

  1. Recall@k: This metric measures the proportion of relevant items present within the top-k recommendations. The higher the recall, the better the meaningful items are being presented to customers.

  2. Inverse Propensity Score weighted NDCG (IPS-NDCG@k): A bit of a mouthful, but this metric assesses how well the rankings perform while factoring in position bias. It reflects how effective the recommendations are in light of the previous attention given to items.

  3. Average Recommendation Popularity (ARP@k): This metric measures how popular the recommended items are by looking at their interactions. A lower popularity can indicate a more balanced assortment.

  4. Effective Catalog Size (ECS@X): This measures the share of items contributing to a certain percentage of all interactions, giving insight into the diversity of what is being engaged with.

By tracking these metrics, the researchers could see how the changes brought about by position debiasing impacted both user experience and engagement with the product assortment.

Adapting to Online Testing

After offline evaluations showed promising results, it was time to put position debiasing to the test in the real world. An online A/B test was conducted, where half the users experienced the new debiased model while the other half interacted with the traditional model. This method ensured that changes could be directly attributed to the debiasing approach.

Once again, the results were encouraging. The findings mirrored those in the offline experiments with no significant changes to engagement or financial metrics. The average recommendation popularity dropped, which indicated that the system was no longer favoring just a few popular items. This shift allowed for a wider variety of items to be seen and interacted with, reflecting a more balanced approach to listing products.

What Does This Mean for the Future?

With the successful implementation of position debiasing on e-commerce platforms, there are broader implications for how shopping experiences can evolve. By breaking down the walls that position bias creates, there’s an opportunity for a more equitable shopping experience. Nobody wants to miss out on that perfect item just because it was stuck at the bottom of the list!

As businesses adopt these techniques, they can attract more partners and content providers looking to showcase their products. The result? Happy customers who can find what they need and businesses that thrive because they can present their full catalog effectively.

Conclusion

Position bias can be a real sneaky bugger in the world of e-commerce, resulting in a skewed experience for customers and lost opportunities for businesses. However, through the wonderful world of technology and clever thinking, strategies like position debiasing can turn the tables. By giving every item a fair shot and breaking the cycle of popularity, everyone wins. It’s like finally learning to share those last few cookies—better for all involved!

As we continue to refine the shopping experience, it’s important to remember that sometimes the less popular items have just as much to offer. So the next time you’re on an e-commerce site, don’t be surprised if that hidden gem catches your eye. It’s all part of a smarter, fairer shopping experience!

Original Source

Title: Reducing Popularity Influence by Addressing Position Bias

Abstract: Position bias poses a persistent challenge in recommender systems, with much of the existing research focusing on refining ranking relevance and driving user engagement. However, in practical applications, the mitigation of position bias does not always result in detectable short-term improvements in ranking relevance. This paper provides an alternative, practically useful view of what position bias reduction methods can achieve. It demonstrates that position debiasing can spread visibility and interactions more evenly across the assortment, effectively reducing a skew in the popularity of items induced by the position bias through a feedback loop. We offer an explanation of how position bias affects item popularity. This includes an illustrative model of the item popularity histogram and the effect of the position bias on its skewness. Through offline and online experiments on our large-scale e-commerce platform, we show that position debiasing can significantly improve assortment utilization, without any degradation in user engagement or financial metrics. This makes the ranking fairer and helps attract more partners or content providers, benefiting the customers and the business in the long term.

Authors: Andrii Dzhoha, Alexey Kurennoy, Vladimir Vlasov, Marjan Celikik

Last Update: 2024-12-11 00:00:00

Language: English

Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.08780

Source PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.08780

Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.

Thank you to arxiv for use of its open access interoperability.

Similar Articles