Sci Simple

New Science Research Articles Everyday

# Quantitative Finance # Machine Learning # Statistical Finance

Revolutionizing Stock Predictions with New Models

Higher Order Transformers enhance stock movement predictions using diverse data sources.

Soroush Omranpour, Guillaume Rabusseau, Reihaneh Rabbany

― 9 min read


Next-Level Stock Next-Level Stock Predictions forecasting. Innovative models reshape stock market
Table of Contents

Predicting how stocks will move is a big deal in finance. Investors and traders rely heavily on this ability to make smart choices about buying and selling. The stock market can be unpredictable, like trying to guess what a cat will do next. It moves based on countless factors, including numbers, trends, and yes, even what people are saying online. This makes stock movement prediction a real challenge.

Traditional methods to predict stock movements have leaned on two main approaches: technical analysis (TA) and fundamental analysis (FA). Technical analysis looks at historical price data. It's like trying to read tea leaves, but with charts. Fundamental analysis digs deeper into a company's financial health by looking at earnings, debts, and economic factors. It’s like checking if your friend has a stable job before lending them money.

However, these methods often miss out on the messy reality of how stocks interact. Picture a crowded market where people are talking, and it’s hard to see who is standing next to whom. Recent advances in machine learning and artificial intelligence aim to improve this prediction game by integrating more data sources. This includes news articles and social media chatter, which can offer insights into how people feel about a company or its stock. Think of it as getting the latest gossip about a neighbor’s new puppy before deciding whether to visit.

Despite these advances, stock prediction models still struggle. They can be overwhelmed by the sheer amount of data and the many moving parts in the financial world. This is where Higher Order Transformers come into play. They bring a fresh approach to handling the complexities of various data forms, which we’ll explore in the following sections.

The Challenge of Stock Movement Prediction

The stock movement prediction task is critical for anyone looking to make money in the market. The basic idea is to predict whether a stock price will go up or down over a given period. This can be defined simply: if the closing price of a stock today is higher than yesterday, that’s an upward movement. If it’s lower, that’s a downward movement.

In a world where just a tweet can send a stock soaring or crashing, it's no wonder that predicting price movements is tricky. Stocks don't just dance to their historical price tunes—they also sway to the rhythm of social media and various external factors. Therefore, predicting stock prices is a bit like trying to dance the tango while everyone else at the party is doing the cha-cha.

Traditional Approaches: Technical and Fundamental Analysis

As mentioned, traditional approaches in stock prediction involve two main schools of thought.

Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis is like having a crystal ball that looks at past price movements, believing that history tends to repeat itself. Traders use charts and mathematical models to forecast future prices based on historical data. Popular methods like ARIMA (AutoRegressive Integrated Moving Average) help identify patterns in prices over time. However, this method often overlooks external influencers—such as news, economic shifts, and social media buzz—that can affect stock movements in real time.

Fundamental Analysis

On the other hand, Fundamental Analysis digs into a company’s health and overall market conditions. It considers earnings reports, market conditions, and even the economy as a whole. Think of it as looking under the hood of a car before buying it—nobody wants a lemon, right? This analysis can provide deeper insights, but it can sometimes miss the mark when it comes to predicting stock price movements driven by transient market sentiments or unexpected global events.

Moving Towards Multimodal Approaches

While technical and fundamental analyses provide valuable insights, they often lack the ability to integrate various data sources. This gap led to the creation of multimodal approaches. These methods aim to include different signals, such as social media sentiment and inter-stock correlations. Essentially, it’s about bringing together various types of information to create a fuller picture.

Recent advancements in machine learning have driven this shift. By leveraging Natural Language Processing (NLP) and graph neural networks (GNNs), researchers can analyze diverse data sources simultaneously. It's like being able to hear what everyone in the room is saying instead of just focusing on one conversation.

Enter Higher Order Transformers

Now, what are Higher Order Transformers? Picture an upgraded version of a transformer model that can handle more complex data forms. Traditional transformer models are great at understanding relationships in data, but they often stumble when faced with high-dimensional and multivariate time-series data. Higher Order Transformers step in to solve this issue.

The Basics of Transformers

Transformers originated in the field of natural language processing, helping machines understand and generate human language. They work by evaluating the relationships between data points, much like how we would connect the dots in a puzzle. However, when it comes to the stock market, the puzzle pieces are much more intricate.

Higher Order Transformers Explained

Higher Order Transformers take the transformer architecture to new heights—literally! By extending self-attention mechanisms to higher-order interactions, they can capture complex relationships across different time frames and multiple variables. In simpler terms, they help the model understand not just how individual stocks move but also how they influence each other in the market.

To handle the heavy computational load that comes with complex calculations, Higher Order Transformers use clever tricks. They implement low-rank approximations and kernel attention techniques. This means that instead of getting bogged down by mountains of data, they can process it much more efficiently, like a chef prepping ingredients before cooking a big meal.

Multimodal Encoder-Decoder Architecture

The proposed architecture uses a multimodal encoder-decoder format. The encoder processes textual data from social media or news, while the decoder focuses on price-related time series data. This division helps each part of the model specialize, much like how a chef might focus on baking while another works on preparing a salad.

Combining these modalities helps give a clearer picture of market dynamics and provides a more holistic understanding of how various factors interact. Think of it as being able to cook an entire feast by having specialists in different areas working together.

Data Sources and Preparation

The model was tested on the Stocknet dataset, which features historical price data from 88 stocks, matched with relevant tweets. The data was organized into a timeline, capturing the ebb and flow of both prices and public sentiment. This process is akin to keeping a diary of a stock’s life, noting down every important event and emotion that could influence its moves.

To ensure that the predictions were accurate, the data was split into training, validation, and test sets. This splitting allows for a robust evaluation of the model’s performance, ensuring that it doesn’t just memorize the training data—no one wants a model that can only recite its lines!

Model Configuration

The model employed an Adam optimizer for efficient training. It went through up to 1000 training epochs, which is fancy talk for saying it had many chances to learn from both successes and mistakes. Hyperparameters were fine-tuned through a grid search, like testing different ingredients to find the perfect recipe.

The evaluation metrics included accuracy, F1 score, and Matthew's correlation coefficient (MCC). These metrics help gauge how well the model performed. Think of them as report cards for the model’s performance—nobody wants to flunk, especially in the stock market!

Performance and Comparisons

When comparing the Higher Order Transformer to traditional models, the results showed a clear edge for our new approach. While it didn’t top the chart in every single metric, it performed exceptionally well in accuracy and F1 scores. It outclassed most existing models, demonstrating that it could handle the complex tapestry of stock data better than its predecessors.

In this race, it was like putting an electric car up against a bicycle—the electric car may have some advantages on many fronts!

The Importance of Multimodal Data

A key takeaway from testing was the advantage of using multimodal data compared to sticking to a single type. When both price data and social media sentiments were integrated, the predictions improved significantly. It was a classic case of teamwork making the dream work!

Moreover, the model showed better performance when it utilized kernelized attention, which is just a fancy way of saying it was better at focusing on important data without getting lost in the noise.

Ablation studies—tests where specific components of the model are removed one at a time—further confirmed the importance of these elements. They showcased that applying attention mechanisms across multiple dimensions leads to better outcomes.

Looking Ahead

The work doesn’t stop here! Future plans include testing the model on other datasets to strengthen its capabilities further. Researchers hope to analyze real-world stock data to gauge the practical applications of their work.

As markets evolve, so too will the methods used to predict them. In the world of finance, staying ahead is key. Who wouldn’t want to know when to buy low and sell high?

Conclusion

The introduction of Higher Order Transformers marks a notable step forward in stock movement prediction. By effectively processing and analyzing multiple data types, these models unlock new potentials in understanding the stock market. They not only enhance our ability to predict movements but also pave the way for more sophisticated analyses in finance.

The blend of technological advances with financial wisdom showcases how collaborative efforts can yield improved outcomes, much like a good old-fashioned team sport. With each advancement, we get closer to making accurate stock predictions, helping investors dodge those proverbial banana peels in the financial world.

So, while predicting stock movements might never be as simple as flipping a coin or throwing darts at a board, advancements like Higher Order Transformers give us a fighting chance to read the signs and trends more effectively. Who knows, perhaps one day we’ll crack the code of the stock market!

Original Source

Title: Higher Order Transformers: Enhancing Stock Movement Prediction On Multimodal Time-Series Data

Abstract: In this paper, we tackle the challenge of predicting stock movements in financial markets by introducing Higher Order Transformers, a novel architecture designed for processing multivariate time-series data. We extend the self-attention mechanism and the transformer architecture to a higher order, effectively capturing complex market dynamics across time and variables. To manage computational complexity, we propose a low-rank approximation of the potentially large attention tensor using tensor decomposition and employ kernel attention, reducing complexity to linear with respect to the data size. Additionally, we present an encoder-decoder model that integrates technical and fundamental analysis, utilizing multimodal signals from historical prices and related tweets. Our experiments on the Stocknet dataset demonstrate the effectiveness of our method, highlighting its potential for enhancing stock movement prediction in financial markets.

Authors: Soroush Omranpour, Guillaume Rabusseau, Reihaneh Rabbany

Last Update: 2024-12-13 00:00:00

Language: English

Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.10540

Source PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.10540

Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.

Thank you to arxiv for use of its open access interoperability.

Similar Articles