Empowering Village Doctors in TB Care
Informal providers could transform TB management in India with proper support.
Poshan Thapa, Padmanesan Narasimhan, John J. Hall, Rohan Jayasuriya, Partha Sarathi Mukherjee, Dipesh Kr Das, Kristen Beek
― 7 min read
Table of Contents
- Who are the Informal Providers?
- IPs and TB Care
- The Research Study
- Methodology
- Current Roles of Informal Providers
- 1. Passive Case Finding and Referral
- 2. Accompanying Patients
- 3. Collection and Transportation of Sputum Samples
- 4. Treatment Support
- Potential Roles of Informal Providers
- 1. Health Promotion and Education
- 2. Active Case Finding
- 3. Continued Passive Case Finding and Referral
- 4. Collection and Transportation of Sputum Samples
- 5. Contact Tracing
- 6. Counseling During TB Treatment
- Roles Not Suitable for Informal Providers
- The Importance of Training and Support
- Addressing Challenges in Engagement
- Conclusion
- Original Source
India carries a hefty burden of Tuberculosis (TB), accounting for a significant portion of the global cases. With an estimated 2.8 million TB cases, India is at the forefront among high TB burden countries. Despite some progress in reducing the number of infections over the years, the efforts are still falling short of what the National Strategic Plan (NSP) for TB Elimination aims to achieve. The NSP calls for better collaboration with the private sector, as around half of TB patients are being treated outside the official TB elimination program.
Who are the Informal Providers?
In India, the private health sector is a mixed bag, featuring everything from small clinics to big hospitals, and includes both informal healthcare providers (IPs) and qualified specialists. The informal providers, often called "village doctors," play a crucial role in healthcare delivery, especially in rural areas. They often operate outside the formal healthcare system and may not have official qualifications, yet many people rely on them for treatments.
Interestingly, IPs manage to provide a substantial amount of primary care, catering to about 70% of patients in some rural areas. They frequently prescribe treatments, including antibiotics, without any formal training. Consequently, they are often the first point of contact for patients experiencing symptoms of TB.
IPs and TB Care
Despite their significance, IPs are often overlooked in the strategies of the National TB Elimination Program (NTEP). However, numerous studies are beginning to highlight the value of involving IPs in TB care. Many TB patients first consult IPs before making their way to government healthcare facilities. Research indicates that when IPs are engaged and supported, they can greatly help in detecting and managing TB cases, leading to improved patient outcomes.
With TB remaining a major public health challenge, it becomes critical to delve into the current and potential roles of IPs in TB care. In West Bengal, where IPs are officially recognized and trained by the government, understanding their roles could provide valuable insights into improving TB management.
The Research Study
A detailed investigation was conducted to explore IPs' roles in managing TB in West Bengal. This study included qualitative interviews with both IPs and formal providers (FPs), who are part of the NTEP. The aim was to gather insights on how IPs are currently involved in TB care and how they could be better utilized within the NTEP framework.
Methodology
The research drew from a previous scoping review, which identified six roles for IPs in TB care: Health Promotion, active case finding, passive case finding and referral, laboratory sputum sample collection, treatment support, and monitoring adverse drug reactions. The latest study aimed to examine these roles in more depth while also being open to discovering new responsibilities that IPs could undertake.
Interviews were conducted in Bengali, the local language, and focused on the interactions of IPs with TB cases and their willingness to take on additional roles.
Current Roles of Informal Providers
Through the research, four key roles were identified that IPs are already performing in TB care. These roles include:
1. Passive Case Finding and Referral
IP referrals are a critical aspect of their practice. They identify patients who may have TB symptoms and refer them to appropriate health facilities. The government has formally recognized this role, providing IPs with referral slips to facilitate this process. Engaged IPs reported using these slips when referring patients, while non-engaged IPs still offered referrals as part of their routine practice, even without formal support.
2. Accompanying Patients
Some IPs offer to accompany patients to healthcare facilities, especially if a patient has no one else to help them. While not a widespread practice, it highlights the commitment of some IPs to their patients.
Sputum Samples
3. Collection and Transportation ofIPs sometimes assist local health facilities by collecting and transporting sputum samples from patients suspected of having TB. Despite some concerns about public perceptions of collecting samples, IPs are willing to engage in this task under the right circumstances.
4. Treatment Support
IPs often informally support TB patients by ensuring they adhere to their treatment regimens. This role is particularly vital in areas with limited healthcare infrastructure, and it is recognized by formal providers as an essential service.
Potential Roles of Informal Providers
The study also examined potential roles that IPs expressed willingness to take on in TB care. Six additional roles were identified, including:
1. Health Promotion and Education
IPs could play an important role in educating the community about TB, countering stigma, and dispelling myths. They have experience with health education from previous health crises, such as COVID-19, and expressed enthusiasm to do similar work in TB care.
2. Active Case Finding
Some IPs are open to participating in active case finding through community outreach, such as door-to-door visits to identify individuals with TB symptoms. However, they seek structured support and compensation for this role.
3. Continued Passive Case Finding and Referral
Both IPs and formal providers agree on the necessity of continuing the passive case finding and referral roles, especially in remote areas where IPs are often the first point of contact.
4. Collection and Transportation of Sputum Samples
IPs are interested in helping with sputum sample collection and transportation, provided there is adequate supply and a robust incentive system in place.
5. Contact Tracing
IP involvement in contact tracing for TB patients can significantly strengthen the government's efforts in the NTEP. Their familiarity with local communities makes them well-suited for this task.
6. Counseling During TB Treatment
Counseling is another area where IPs can provide valuable support. Their established relationships with patients allow them to offer guidance on medication adherence and managing side effects.
Roles Not Suitable for Informal Providers
While IPs have a wide range of capabilities, certain roles remain outside their scope. Formal providers caution against allowing IPs to clinically diagnose or initiate treatment for TB, as these responsibilities require higher levels of training and expertise. Similarly, IPs themselves recognize the importance of referring patients for further evaluation rather than attempting to treat them.
The Importance of Training and Support
A common theme that emerged from the study is the necessity for training and support for IPs. While they possess extensive knowledge of their communities and are eager to participate in TB care, structured training would enhance their skills and enable them to undertake more significant roles within the NTEP framework. Such training would not only improve TB outcomes but also provide IPs with a sense of purpose and greater credibility in their communities.
Addressing Challenges in Engagement
Despite their potential, several challenges hinder the effective integration of IPs into the TB control program. These include the need for time management between clinical duties and additional responsibilities, as well as the importance of establishing a supportive environment that acknowledges the efforts of IPs.
Conclusion
The involvement of informal healthcare providers in TB care in India represents a promising opportunity to enhance the effectiveness of the National TB Elimination Program. With the right training and support, IPs can take on various roles in TB management—ranging from patient education to active case finding and treatment support. The collaboration between informal and formal healthcare providers can lead to better TB outcomes and improved overall healthcare delivery.
In the battle against TB, engaging IPs might just be the secret weapon India needs. After all, who knew that the local village doctor could become such a valuable ally? With a little training, support, and appreciation, these informal providers can step up to the plate and make a world of difference in the fight against TB. Who says superheroes only wear capes? Sometimes, they wear simple white coats!
Original Source
Title: Exploring current and potential roles of informal healthcare providers in tuberculosis care in West Bengal, India: a qualitative content analysis
Abstract: India accounts for 27 percent of global Tuberculosis (TB) cases, the highest among the 30 high-burden countries. Despite growing evidence highlighting the significance and potential of Informal Healthcare Providers (IPs) in TB care, their role remains ambiguous in Indias TB policies and guidelines, in contrast to the well-defined roles of the formal private sector. Considering such gaps, this study explores the perspectives of IPs and Formal Providers (FPs) regarding IPs current and potential roles in TB care. The study was conducted in West Bengal, India. We adopted a qualitative approach and conducted in-depth interviews with 23 IPs and 11 FPs. The study data was analysed using a content analysis approach. The studys findings identified four current roles of IPs in TB care, two of which were corroborated by FPs: 1) Passive case finding and referral and 2) Treatment supporter. As for potential roles, an alignment was observed between the two groups of providers for the majority of the roles (5/7 roles). However, both IPs and FPs expressed reservations about assigning IPs the roles of 1) Clinical evaluation of TB cases and 2) Initiation of treatment for confirmed TB patients. The findings highlight the active involvement of IPs in various TB care roles, acknowledged by FPs, and also demonstrate significant potential for their expanded engagement under the National TB Elimination Program (NTEP) of India.
Authors: Poshan Thapa, Padmanesan Narasimhan, John J. Hall, Rohan Jayasuriya, Partha Sarathi Mukherjee, Dipesh Kr Das, Kristen Beek
Last Update: 2024-12-08 00:00:00
Language: English
Source URL: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.12.05.24318366
Source PDF: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.12.05.24318366.full.pdf
Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.
Thank you to medrxiv for use of its open access interoperability.