Sci Simple

New Science Research Articles Everyday

# Computer Science # Computation and Language # Machine Learning

Making Sense of Table Data with Plan-of-SQLs

A clear new method for answering questions from tables.

Giang, Nguyen, Ivan Brugere, Shubham Sharma, Sanjay Kariyappa, Anh Totti Nguyen, Freddy Lecue

― 6 min read


Revolutionizing Table Revolutionizing Table Data Insights table data. Transforming how we interpret and trust
Table of Contents

In today's world, we deal with a lot of information displayed in tables, from finances to healthcare Data. Extracting insights from these tables can be tricky, especially when a little mistake can lead to huge errors. Therefore, it's important to have systems that can answer questions about these tables in a clear and understandable way.

This article looks at a new method called Plan-of-SQLs that helps answer questions from tables while being easy to understand. The main goal is to provide clear Explanations for the answers the system gives, making it safer for use in fields like finance and healthcare.

The Need for Interpretability

When using advanced tools to answer questions based on tables, having a clear understanding of how those answers are generated is crucial. Imagine asking a system a question about a financial report and getting back an answer that doesn’t explain how it arrived at that conclusion. This can cause confusion, and in some cases, lead to disastrous results.

In industries like finance, a wrong decision can cost millions, as seen in the case of Citigroup, which faced massive financial losses due to incorrect data interpretation. Similarly, in healthcare, an inaccurate assessment can have life-threatening consequences. For example, overlooking a patient’s family history could result in serious health risks.

These scenarios highlight the importance of making sure that the systems we build to analyze table data communicate clearly and transparently.

The Shortcomings of Current Methods

Recent advances in using Large Language Models (LLMs) for Table Question Answering (Table QA) have improved accuracy, but many of these methods fall short when it comes to providing understandable explanations. Although they can produce correct answers, they often do so in ways that only a machine can understand.

There are various methods for interpreting these systems, but most are either too complicated or don’t help users understand how decisions were made. For example:

  • End-to-End: This method relies completely on LLMs to provide an answer without explaining how it reached that answer.

  • Text-to-SQL: Here, SQL commands are generated but require users to have knowledge of database management, which can be a barrier.

  • Chain-of-Table: This method performs operations in a sequence but lacks clarity in explaining each step clearly.

These methods often lead to confusion about how each piece of information relates to the final answer.

Introducing Plan-of-SQLs

To tackle these issues, we present Plan-of-SQLs. This new method breaks down the process into small, simple steps that are easy to follow. Each step can be expressed in natural language and is converted into a SQL command to process the data from the table.

How It Works

  1. Planning in Natural Language: The system begins by generating a plan in clear, understandable language. It lists out the steps it needs to take to arrive at the answer.

  2. Converting to SQL: Each step is then translated into a SQL command that can be executed on the table.

  3. Executing the Steps: The system executes these commands one after the other, transforming the table step by step until it reaches the final answer.

  4. Providing Explanations: Along with the answer, the system provides visual explanations that show which parts of the table were used in reaching that answer.

By using this structured and straightforward approach, Plan-of-SQLs can significantly improve both accuracy and interpretability.

Evaluation of Plan-of-SQLs

A series of tests were conducted to evaluate how well Plan-of-SQLs performed compared to the existing methods. Users found it to be much clearer and more informative. The results showed that human judges preferred the explanations provided by Plan-of-SQLs over the other methods.

This method also allowed users to identify where the system succeeded or failed in its reasoning, which is particularly valuable when debugging or understanding decision-making processes.

Feedback from Users

Feedback from participants showed that they felt more confident in understanding the answers provided by Plan-of-SQLs. The ability to see the steps taken and how each piece of data contributed to the final result made users feel more in control and informed.

Real-World Applications

The practical implications of this method are significant. Financial analysts can use it to make more informed decisions based on clear insights from market data. Healthcare professionals can rely on it to interpret patient records in a way that highlights critical information without needing a deep understanding of SQL or databases.

For example, a financial analyst might query a database to find trends over the last quarter. With Plan-of-SQLs, they can see exactly which rows of data were selected and why, making them more confident in their findings.

Challenges and Future Directions

Despite the advantages of Plan-of-SQLs, some challenges remain. For instance, there are certain complex queries that can still confuse the system. This happens particularly with data that contains special symbols or non-standard formatting.

To address these challenges, researchers are looking into better ways to preprocess tables and handle tricky queries. There's also a focus on making the system even more user-friendly and robust against various input types.

Looking Ahead

As technology continues to advance, the potential for Plan-of-SQLs remains promising. With ongoing research and development, it is expected that these systems will become more reliable, saving time and reducing errors across industries.

Developers also hope to integrate user feedback into future versions of the system to enhance its interpretability and usability even further.

Conclusion

In summary, Plan-of-SQLs represents an important advancement in Table Question Answering systems. By prioritizing clarity and interpretability, it builds a bridge between complex data and user understanding. This is essential not only for making informed decisions but also for ensuring that those decisions are based on accurate and understandable information.

In a world where data-driven decisions are the norm, having interpretable tools is no longer a luxury but a necessity. So whether you're a financial analyst analyzing market trends or a healthcare professional assessing patient records, having a clear view of how answers are generated will undoubtedly lead to better outcomes.

Just remember, the next time you ask a question about a table, the clearer the answer, the less likely you’ll need to consult a magic 8-ball!

Original Source

Title: Interpretable LLM-based Table Question Answering

Abstract: Interpretability for Table Question Answering (Table QA) is critical, particularly in high-stakes industries like finance or healthcare. Although recent approaches using Large Language Models (LLMs) have significantly improved Table QA performance, their explanations for how the answers are generated are ambiguous. To fill this gap, we introduce Plan-of-SQLs ( or POS), an interpretable, effective, and efficient approach to Table QA that answers an input query solely with SQL executions. Through qualitative and quantitative evaluations with human and LLM judges, we show that POS is most preferred among explanation methods, helps human users understand model decision boundaries, and facilitates model success and error identification. Furthermore, when evaluated in standard benchmarks (TabFact, WikiTQ, and FetaQA), POS achieves competitive or superior accuracy compared to existing methods, while maintaining greater efficiency by requiring significantly fewer LLM calls and database queries.

Authors: Giang, Nguyen, Ivan Brugere, Shubham Sharma, Sanjay Kariyappa, Anh Totti Nguyen, Freddy Lecue

Last Update: 2024-12-16 00:00:00

Language: English

Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.12386

Source PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.12386

Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.

Thank you to arxiv for use of its open access interoperability.

More from authors

Similar Articles