The Link Between Alcohol Use Disorder and Obesity
Research highlights shared genetic factors between alcohol use disorder and obesity.
Joshua C Gray, S. G. Malone, C. N. Davis, Z. Piserchia, M. R. Setzer, S. I. Toikumo, H. Zhou, E. L. Winterlind, J. Gelernter, A. C. Justice, L. Leggio, C. T. Rentsch, H. R. Kranzler
― 6 min read
Table of Contents
Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD) and Obesity are two serious health issues affecting many people. Both can lead to various health problems and have significant economic costs. AUD can increase the risk of liver cancer, heart disease, and liver conditions like cirrhosis. Obesity, which is when a person's body mass index (BMI) exceeds 30, is linked to higher chances of high blood pressure, type II diabetes, heart disease, and various kinds of cancer. In the United States, more people are experiencing both heavy drinking and obesity at the same time.
Connection Between Alcohol Use Disorder and Obesity
Researchers believe that AUD and obesity may share some common biological pathways. A key player in both drinking and eating behaviors is dopamine, a chemical in the Brain that affects motivation and self-control. Studies suggest there are similarities in brain circuits involved in addiction and overeating. This idea supports the view that obesity might have addictive traits, although not everyone agrees with this notion.
Both alcohol and food can influence appetite-related hormones like ghrelin and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1). Recent studies have shown that medications targeting GLP-1, usually used for treating type 2 diabetes and obesity, may also be beneficial for people with AUD. On the flip side, some medications for AUD have been found to help people lose weight. Topiramate is one such medication that can help treat AUD and is also prescribed for weight loss when paired with phentermine.
Both conditions also have genetic ties. About half of the risk for developing AUD is believed to come from Genetics, while obesity's risk is estimated to be between 40-70% heritable. Despite these genetic connections, studies show no significant shared genetic correlation between AUD and obesity-related traits, meaning the genes linked to each do not appear to directly affect the other.
Investigating Genetic Overlap
To examine the connection between AUD and obesity more closely, scientists used a method called MiXeR. This method helps to identify potential shared genetic factors without biasing the results based on how these factors influence each condition. Along with MiXeR, another statistical approach called conjunctional false discovery rate (conjFDR) was used to find specific genes associated with both traits. The hypothesis was that the lack of genetic correlation between AUD and obesity was due to shared genetic factors that have different effects on each condition.
To support this idea, researchers looked at genetic data from large groups of people with either AUD or obesity. By analyzing this data, they aimed to find shared genetic traits and assess how these traits might relate to brain functions.
Polygenic Overlap Analysis
Using the MiXeR approach, researchers found an 80.9% overlap in the genetic factors associated with AUD and obesity, even though the genetic correlation was very low. Out of the potential causal genetic variants identified for each condition, a significant number were shared. Almost half of those shared variants were determined to have similar effects on both traits.
In additional analyses, researchers compared the genetic overlap between AUD and obesity to other psychiatric conditions like depression, ADHD, and schizophrenia. They found that both AUD and obesity had a high degree of shared genetic variants with these other conditions, confirming the importance of understanding these relationships.
Significant Genetic Loci
The analysis using conjFDR revealed 132 genetic regions significantly linked to both AUD and obesity. Among these, many had opposite effects on the two conditions. This finding supports the idea that the lack of genetic correlation stems from shared variants having different impacts on AUD and obesity.
For instance, one significant genetic variant located in the FTO gene increases the risk of obesity while decreasing the risk of AUD. This aligns with known research highlighting the role of FTO in obesity-related traits. Another shared variant within the SLC39A8 gene displayed opposite effects on both traits as well. Interestingly, a different variant in the CADM2 gene had consistent effects in the same direction for both conditions.
Functional Relationships
Further analyses indicated that many of the genes linked to these shared SNPs are highly active in the brain. Specifically, several of these genes were found to be overexpressed in brain regions involved in functions such as decision-making, reward processing, and appetite control. Some brain areas like the frontal cortex, amygdala, and hypothalamus, known for their roles in controlling both food intake and alcohol consumption, exhibited significant associations with both AUD and obesity.
Brain Imaging and Phenotype Associations
Researchers also explored how AUD and obesity relate to various brain image-derived traits. They found significant associations with gray matter volumes in specific brain regions. These areas include the caudate nucleus and amygdala, which are crucial for processing rewards and making decisions about food and drink.
Most importantly, this analysis revealed that many associations for AUD matched the effects seen for obesity. This suggests that the same brain mechanisms may be influencing both conditions.
Treatment and Future Research
Implications forThe findings from this research highlight the complex relationship between AUD and obesity and suggest that treatment options targeting shared genetic pathways could be beneficial for individuals dealing with both issues. Some drug development efforts have already identified potential medications that could address both alcohol consumption and obesity. For instance, medications targeting specific genes like OPRM1 and PDE4B may provide avenues for dual treatment.
Despite the insights gained from this study, several limitations should be noted. One concern is that BMI may not fully represent true obesity, as it does not account for variations in body composition. Future studies should evaluate a broader range of obesity-related measures to gain a more comprehensive understanding.
Additionally, this study focused solely on individuals of European ancestry to ensure compatibility in genetic analyses. However, this limits the applicability of findings to diverse populations. Future research should aim to include diverse groups in its analyses to enhance understanding across different ancestries and improve the generalizability of the results.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the study sheds light on the genetic relationship between AUD and obesity. The absence of a strong genetic correlation appears to be due to shared genetic variants that have differing effects on each condition. The research underscores the importance of considering these factors when studying the comorbidity of AUD and obesity, as there are overlapping biological mechanisms at play. This knowledge will help guide future treatment options and improve interventions for individuals affected by both disorders.
Original Source
Title: Alcohol use disorder and body mass index show genetic pleiotropy and shared neural associations
Abstract: Despite neurobiological overlap, alcohol use disorder (AUD) and body mass index (BMI) show minimal genetic correlation (rg), possibly due to mixed directions of shared variants. We applied MiXeR to investigate shared genetic architecture between AUD and BMI, conjunctional false discovery rate (conjFDR) to detect shared loci and their directional effect, Local Analysis of (co)Variant Association (LAVA) for local rg, Functional Mapping and Annotation (FUMA) to identify lead single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) to examine tissue enrichment, and BrainXcan to assess associations with brain phenotypes. MiXeR indicated 82.2% polygenic overlap, despite a rg of -.03. ConjFDR identified 132 shared lead SNPs, with 53 novel, showing both concordant and discordant effects. GTEx analyses identified overexpression in multiple brain regions. Amygdala and caudate nucleus volumes were associated with AUD and BMI. Opposing variant effects explain the minimal rg between AUD and BMI, with implicated brain regions involved in executive function and reward, clarifying their polygenic overlap and neurobiological mechanisms.
Authors: Joshua C Gray, S. G. Malone, C. N. Davis, Z. Piserchia, M. R. Setzer, S. I. Toikumo, H. Zhou, E. L. Winterlind, J. Gelernter, A. C. Justice, L. Leggio, C. T. Rentsch, H. R. Kranzler
Last Update: 2024-12-14 00:00:00
Language: English
Source URL: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.05.03.24306773
Source PDF: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.05.03.24306773.full.pdf
Licence: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.
Thank you to medrxiv for use of its open access interoperability.