Sci Simple

New Science Research Articles Everyday

# Health Sciences # Oncology

New Insights into Pediatric Brain Tumors

Research links imaging features to tumor biology in children with low-grade gliomas.

Anahita Fathi Kazerooni, Adam Kraya, Komal S. Rathi, Meen Chul Kim, Varun Kesherwani, Ryan Corbett, Arastoo Vossough, Nastaran Khalili, Deep Gandhi, Neda Khalili, Ariana M. Familiar, Run Jin, Xiaoyan Huang, Yuankun Zhu, Alex Sickler, Matthew R. Lueder, Saksham Phul, Phillip B. Storm, Jeffrey B. Ware, Jessica B. Foster, Sabine Mueller, Jo Lynne Rokita, Michael J. Fisher, Adam C. Resnick, Ali Nabavizadeh

― 7 min read


New Study on Pediatric New Study on Pediatric Brain Tumors for children's brain tumors. Linking imaging to better treatments
Table of Contents

Pediatric Low-grade Gliomas (pLGGs) are the most common brain tumors found in children. They account for about one-third of all brain cancers in young patients. These tumors grow slowly and have a variety of forms. While complete removal of the tumor can lead to better survival rates, some tumors are located deep in the brain or spread out too much, making surgery difficult. In such cases, doctors often recommend chemotherapy after surgery, but the long-term success rate for these treatments is around 50% after ten years. Furthermore, while fighting the tumor, treatments can sometimes affect a child's thinking and overall brain functions, which may reduce their quality of life.

The Complexity of Tumors

Tumors are complicated biological systems influenced by many factors. They are shaped by a wide range of molecular changes that happen in cells, which can affect how a tumor behaves and grows. This complexity makes it tricky to find treatments that work for everyone, as different types of the same tumor can respond quite differently to treatments.

One way to understand this complexity is by looking at tumor traits that can be seen on medical images, known as radiophenotypes. These traits don’t just show how the tumor looks on the outside; they also give hints about what’s happening inside at the molecular level. Finding connections between these traits and the underlying biology can potentially improve our understanding of how tumors grow and respond to therapy.

The Importance of Targeted Treatments

pLGGs consist of various molecular subtypes, each with its own unique behavior and treatment response. This means that a "one-size-fits-all" treatment approach is not effective. Instead, it’s essential to develop treatments that specifically target each subtype of pLGG. Recently, new targeted treatments have become available to address certain genetic changes in these tumors. However, to make the most of these treatments, healthcare providers need to understand the biological and molecular basis of pLGGs better, rather than focusing on just one genetic change.

Radiogenomics: The New Frontier

Radiomics is a fancy term for using advanced methods to analyze images taken from a patient’s body. This approach allows researchers to gather helpful information about what is going on inside tumors without having to perform invasive procedures. The goal is to create non-invasive biomarkers that can provide insights into the underlying biology of the tumors, helping doctors make better treatment decisions.

Many existing studies have aimed to predict specific genetic changes in pLGGs using imaging techniques. However, recently, experts have begun to believe that merely focusing on individual gene changes may not provide a complete understanding of tumor behavior. Instead, it is essential to look at how different molecular pathways interact with each other and how they relate to the imaging characteristics observed in patients.

The Study: Analyzing Imaging and Genomic Data

In a recent study, researchers took a closer look at pLGGs by analyzing imaging data from a large group of children. They used a database containing various pieces of information, including clinical data and imaging reports. The study followed strict ethical guidelines and involved patients diagnosed with pLGGs between 2006 and 2018. The imaging data included multiple types of MRI scans, which were collected and analyzed to extract relevant tumor features.

In total, 258 patients were initially looked at, but after applying certain criteria, researchers narrowed the analysis down to 201 patients with complete imaging information. They also gathered genomic data for many of these patients, providing a rich source of information to help them uncover the relationships between imaging features and tumor biology.

Image Processing and Feature Extraction

To make sense of the MRI images, researchers went through a detailed process. A technique called skull stripping was used to remove non-brain parts of the images, and the remaining data were standardized to improve the quality of the information. This process allowed them to extract hundreds of different radiomic features, such as measurements related to the shape and texture of the tumors.

By examining these features, the researchers aimed to uncover differences in the way the tumors appeared on imaging, which could be linked to underlying genetic characteristics. Their hope was to establish imaging clusters—groups of patients who shared similar imaging features—that could correlate with certain biological behaviors.

Clustering Patients Based on Imaging Data

Using advanced statistical methods, researchers grouped patients into different imaging clusters based on their MRI features. They took multiple steps to ensure the clusters accurately represented the data, including reducing the number of features analyzed to focus on the most important ones.

After identifying the optimal number of clusters, they found three distinct imaging groups that showed different characteristics. This was akin to finding different flavors in a box of chocolates: each type had its unique tastes and textures.

Linking Imaging Clusters with Molecular Data

The researchers then connected these imaging clusters with genetic information from the patients. By analyzing the gene expression data, they sought to understand the molecular features that defined each cluster. This analysis included looking at which pathways were most active in each group, providing insight into how the tumors might behave differently.

By employing a statistical method known as ElasticNet logistic regression, the researchers could predict which imaging cluster a patient might belong to based on various factors, such as age, sex, and specific tumor characteristics. The performance of these predictions showed promise, meaning the imaging data could indeed provide meaningful insights into tumor biology.

Survival Analysis and Prognosis

The researchers also looked at the survival rates of patients across different imaging clusters. They discovered that while there were no significant differences in overall survival among the clusters, some patients had better outcomes based on the specific characteristics of their tumors. For instance, certain imaging features could indicate a more favorable prognosis.

One interesting finding was related to a specific genetic mutation known as the KIAA1549::BRAF fusion. Patients with this mutation who fell into one imaging cluster had a surprising prognosis. While one would expect them to have a better outcome, the findings suggested they might not fare as well as expected, indicating a need for a closer look at individual cases.

The Takeaway: A New Approach to Tumor Analysis

This study highlights the potential of using imaging data—when analyzed correctly and in conjunction with genomic information—to gain new insights into pediatric low-grade gliomas. By grouping patients based on imaging features and linking these clusters to molecular data, researchers hope to improve personalized treatment approaches for children with these tumors.

Instead of relying solely on traditional methods that focus on single genetic mutations, this new strategy allows for a broader understanding of how tumors operate. By considering the whole system—how tumors appear on images and what’s happening at the genetic level—doctors may be able to make better choices about treatment, ultimately improving patient care.

Future Directions: What Lies Ahead

As with any scientific endeavor, there’s still a lot of work to be done. Moving forward, researchers want to study larger groups of patients to validate their findings and explore the connections between various molecular and imaging features. They also hope to consider additional types of data, such as other genetic information and clinical outcomes.

Such comprehensive studies can provide a clearer picture of the mechanisms that govern tumor behavior. By continuing to develop methods that integrate imaging and genetic data, doctors can better understand the unique characteristics of each patient’s tumor, paving the way for more targeted treatments that cater to individual needs.

Conclusion: A Bright Future for Pediatric Neuro-Oncology

Overall, the combination of advanced imaging techniques and genomic data analysis represents an exciting new frontier in pediatric neuro-oncology. This innovative approach has the potential to change how doctors understand and treat brain tumors in children. As our knowledge of pLGGs continues to grow, so does the opportunity to improve outcomes for young patients battling these complex conditions.

With each new study and every discovery, we move closer to a future where treatments are tailored not just to the type of tumor but to the unique characteristics of each child. While this journey is far from over, the promise of personalized medicine shines brightly on the horizon, bringing hope to children and families facing the challenges of pediatric brain tumors.

Original Source

Title: Imaging Clusters of Pediatric Low-Grade Glioma are Associated with Distinct Molecular Characteristics

Abstract: BackgroundCancers show heterogeneity at various levels, from genome to radiological imaging. This study aimed to explore the interplay between genomic, transcriptomic, and radiophenotypic data in pediatric low-grade glioma (pLGG), the most common group of brain tumors in children. MethodsWe analyzed data from 201 pLGG patients in the Childrens Brain Tumor Network (CBTN), using principal component analysis and K-Means clustering on 881 radiomic features, along with clinical variables (age, sex, tumor location), to identify imaging clusters and examine their association with 2021 WHO pLGG classifications. To determine the transcriptome pathways linked to imaging clusters, we employed a supervised machine learning model with elastic net logistic regression based on the pathways identified through gene set enrichment and gene co-expression network analyses. ResultsThree imaging clusters with distinct radiomic characteristics were identified. BRAF V600E mutations were primarily found in imaging cluster 3, while KIAA1549::BRAF fusion occurred in subtype 1. The models predictive accuracy (AUC) was 0.77 for subtype 1, 0.78 for subtype 2, and 0.70 for subtype 3. Each imaging cluster exhibited unique molecular mechanisms: subtype 1 was linked to oxidative phosphorylation, PDGFRB, and interleukin signaling, whereas subtype 3 was associated with histone acetylation and DNA methylation pathways, related to BRAF V600E pLGGs. ConclusionsOur radiogenomics study indicates that the intrinsic molecular characteristics of tumors correlate with distinct imaging subgroups in pLGG, paving the way for future multi-modal investigations that may enhance understanding of disease progression and targetability.

Authors: Anahita Fathi Kazerooni, Adam Kraya, Komal S. Rathi, Meen Chul Kim, Varun Kesherwani, Ryan Corbett, Arastoo Vossough, Nastaran Khalili, Deep Gandhi, Neda Khalili, Ariana M. Familiar, Run Jin, Xiaoyan Huang, Yuankun Zhu, Alex Sickler, Matthew R. Lueder, Saksham Phul, Phillip B. Storm, Jeffrey B. Ware, Jessica B. Foster, Sabine Mueller, Jo Lynne Rokita, Michael J. Fisher, Adam C. Resnick, Ali Nabavizadeh

Last Update: 2024-12-16 00:00:00

Language: English

Source URL: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.12.16.24319099

Source PDF: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.12.16.24319099.full.pdf

Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.

Thank you to medrxiv for use of its open access interoperability.

More from authors

Similar Articles