RAG-RewardBench: Aligning AI with Human Needs
A new tool improves AI responses to better match human preferences.
Zhuoran Jin, Hongbang Yuan, Tianyi Men, Pengfei Cao, Yubo Chen, Kang Liu, Jun Zhao
― 4 min read
Table of Contents
In the world of artificial intelligence, language models are becoming smarter and more useful. But there's a catch. While these models can pull in heaps of information from outside sources, they sometimes miss the mark when it comes to what people really want. Enter RAG-RewardBench, a new tool designed to help us figure out how well these models align with what humans are looking for.
Reward Models?
What AreReward models act like a personal trainer for language models. They don’t lift weights but help optimize responses based on what humans prefer. Think of them as the guiding hand that nudges AI to give better answers.
Why RAG-RewardBench?
The big idea behind RAG-RewardBench is to create a way to measure these reward models effectively. This benchmark aims to shine a light on how well existing models are doing, especially when they get data from various sources. The goal is to make sure that language models not only pull in the right info but do so in a way that matches what people really want.
The Need for Evaluation
Imagine asking your favorite AI assistant a question and getting a totally off-the-wall answer. That's not very helpful, right? It can happen when models don’t understand what humans expect. This is where RAG-RewardBench comes into play. It’s like a report card for reward models.
Building RAG-RewardBench
Creating RAG-RewardBench wasn’t as simple as pie. The team had to think about different scenarios to see how well reward models perform. They focused on four main areas:
- Multi-hop Reasoning: This tests if the model can connect dots from multiple pieces of information.
- Fine-grained Citation: Here, the idea is to check if the model correctly cites specific pieces of info instead of just naming a source.
- Appropriate Abstain: Sometimes, it's better to say "I don’t know" than to give a wrong answer. This part checks if the model recognizes when it should abstain.
- Conflict Robustness: In cases where information contradicts itself, can the model still find the right path?
Variety is the Spice of Life
To get accurate results, the team included many different types of data. They didn’t want their evaluation to lean too much toward one area or another. So, they gathered data from 18 different domains, making sure to include various retrievers to get the best information.
How to Measure Success
To see if RAG-RewardBench actually works, the team checked how closely it aligns with what humans think. They used models to analyze responses and found a strong correlation with human evaluations. It’s like getting a high score on a test while still being able to read the room during a group project.
Testing Reward Models
With the benchmark in place, the team started testing 45 different reward models. The results? It turns out that not all models are created equal. Some performed well, but many struggled to keep up with the diverse challenges presented by RAG-RewardBench.
Learning from the Results
One big takeaway is that many existing models show only slight improvements when trained on preferences. This suggests that a change in training methods is necessary to get better results in the future.
What Can Be Improved?
The creators of RAG-RewardBench highlighted the need for a shift toward training methods that better align with human preferences. It’s like teaching a dog new tricks, but this time, the tricks can lead to smarter responses.
Conclusion
RAG-RewardBench opens up a new way to assess and improve reward models. This tool could help AI become a better companion when answering our questions and providing information. Instead of just spewing out facts, models can learn to respond in ways that feel more human, making our interactions smoother and more enjoyable. Who wouldn’t want that?
The Future of AI
Looking ahead, there’s a promising path for AI. By using RAG-RewardBench, we can move closer to creating models that understand us better. With a little tweaking and some well-placed training, we may soon find ourselves chatting with AI that feels just right.
So, as we step into this new chapter of AI, let's keep our fingers crossed. The future may just be filled with answers that are not only smart but also witty, charming, and, most importantly, aligned with what we truly want to know.
Title: RAG-RewardBench: Benchmarking Reward Models in Retrieval Augmented Generation for Preference Alignment
Abstract: Despite the significant progress made by existing retrieval augmented language models (RALMs) in providing trustworthy responses and grounding in reliable sources, they often overlook effective alignment with human preferences. In the alignment process, reward models (RMs) act as a crucial proxy for human values to guide optimization. However, it remains unclear how to evaluate and select a reliable RM for preference alignment in RALMs. To this end, we propose RAG-RewardBench, the first benchmark for evaluating RMs in RAG settings. First, we design four crucial and challenging RAG-specific scenarios to assess RMs, including multi-hop reasoning, fine-grained citation, appropriate abstain, and conflict robustness. Then, we incorporate 18 RAG subsets, six retrievers, and 24 RALMs to increase the diversity of data sources. Finally, we adopt an LLM-as-a-judge approach to improve preference annotation efficiency and effectiveness, exhibiting a strong correlation with human annotations. Based on the RAG-RewardBench, we conduct a comprehensive evaluation of 45 RMs and uncover their limitations in RAG scenarios. Additionally, we also reveal that existing trained RALMs show almost no improvement in preference alignment, highlighting the need for a shift towards preference-aligned training.We release our benchmark and code publicly at https://huggingface.co/datasets/jinzhuoran/RAG-RewardBench/ for future work.
Authors: Zhuoran Jin, Hongbang Yuan, Tianyi Men, Pengfei Cao, Yubo Chen, Kang Liu, Jun Zhao
Last Update: Dec 18, 2024
Language: English
Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.13746
Source PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.13746
Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.
Thank you to arxiv for use of its open access interoperability.
Reference Links
- https://www.latex-project.org/help/documentation/encguide.pdf
- https://huggingface.co/datasets/jinzhuoran/RAG-RewardBench/
- https://github.com/jinzhuoran/RAG-RewardBench/
- https://www.perplexity.ai/
- https://serpapi.com/
- https://huggingface.co/Skywork/Skywork-Critic-Llama-3.1-70B
- https://huggingface.co/infly/INF-ORM-Llama3.1-70B
- https://huggingface.co/Skywork/Skywork-Reward-Gemma-2-27B-v0.2
- https://huggingface.co/facebook/Self-taught-evaluator-llama3.1-70B
- https://huggingface.co/Ray2333/GRM
- https://huggingface.co/Skywork/Skywork-Reward-Gemma-2-27B
- https://huggingface.co/Skywork/Skywork-Critic-Llama-3.1-8B
- https://huggingface.co/nvidia/Llama-3.1-Nemotron-70B-Reward-HF
- https://huggingface.co/LxzGordon/URM-LLaMa-3.1-8B
- https://huggingface.co/Skywork/Skywork-Reward-Llama-3.1-8B
- https://deepmind.google/technologies/gemini/pro/
- https://huggingface.co/Skywork/Skywork-Reward-Llama-3.1-8B-v0.2
- https://openai.com/index/hello-gpt-4o/
- https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct
- https://huggingface.co/internlm/internlm2-20b-reward
- https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen2.5-32B-Instruct
- https://huggingface.co/Ray2333/GRM-Llama3.2-3B-rewardmodel-ft
- https://docs.anthropic.com/en/docs/about-claude/models
- https://openai.com/index/openai-o1-mini-advancing-cost-efficient-reasoning/
- https://huggingface.co/nvidia/Llama-3.1-Nemotron-70B-Instruct-HF
- https://huggingface.co/meta-llama/Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct
- https://huggingface.co/general-preference/GPM-Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct
- https://huggingface.co/allenai/Llama-3.1-Tulu-3-8B-RM
- https://huggingface.co/Nexusflow/Athene-RM-8B
- https://huggingface.co/meta-llama/Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct
- https://deepmind.google/technologies/gemini/flash/
- https://huggingface.co/prometheus-eval/prometheus-7b-v2.0
- https://huggingface.co/Ray2333/GRM-gemma2-2B-rewardmodel-ft
- https://huggingface.co/internlm/internlm2-7b-reward
- https://platform.openai.com/docs/models/gpt-4-turbo-and-gpt-4
- https://huggingface.co/sfairXC/FsfairX-LLaMA3-RM-v0.1
- https://huggingface.co/NCSOFT/Llama-3-OffsetBias-RM-8B
- https://huggingface.co/Nexusflow/Starling-RM-34B
- https://huggingface.co/allenai/Llama-3.1-Tulu-3-70B
- https://huggingface.co/prometheus-eval/prometheus-8x7b-v2.0
- https://huggingface.co/openbmb/Eurus-RM-7b
- https://openai.com/index/gpt-4o-mini-advancing-cost-efficient-intelligence/
- https://huggingface.co/CohereForAI/c4ai-command-r-plus-08-2024
- https://huggingface.co/internlm/internlm2-1
- https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct
- https://huggingface.co/meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct
- https://huggingface.co/allenai/Llama-3.1-Tulu-3-8B
- https://huggingface.co/CohereForAI/c4ai-command-r-08-2024
- https://huggingface.co/mistralai/Mixtral-8x7B-Instruct-v0.1