Sci Simple

New Science Research Articles Everyday

# Physics # Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics

Machine Learning Boosts South Pole Telescope Accuracy

ML enhances pointing precision at the South Pole Telescope for better cosmic observations.

P. M. Chichura, A. Rahlin, A. J. Anderson, B. Ansarinejad, M. Archipley, L. Balkenhol, K. Benabed, A. N. Bender, B. A. Benson, F. Bianchini, L. E. Bleem, F. R. Bouchet, L. Bryant, E. Camphuis, J. E. Carlstrom, C. L. Chang, P. Chaubal, A. Chokshi, T. -L. Chou, A. Coerver, T. M. Crawford, C. Daley, T. de Haan, K. R. Dibert, M. A. Dobbs, M. Doohan, A. Doussot, D. Dutcher, W. Everett, C. Feng, K. R. Ferguson, K. Fichman, A. Foster, S. Galli, A. E. Gambrel, R. W. Gardner, F. Ge, N. Goeckner-Wald, R. Gualtieri, F. Guidi, S. Guns, N. W. Halverson, E. Hivon, G. P. Holder, W. L. Holzapfel, J. C. Hood, A. Hryciuk, N. Huang, F. Kéruzoré, A. R. Khalife, J. Kim, L. Knox, M. Korman, K. Kornoelje, C. -L. Kuo, K. Levy, A. E. Lowitz, C. Lu, A. Maniyar, D. P. Marrone, E. S. Martsen, F. Menanteau, M. Millea, J. Montgomery, Y. Nakato, T. Natoli, G. I. Noble, Y. Omori, S. Padin, Z. Pan, P. Paschos, K. A. Phadke, A. W. Pollak, K. Prabhu, W. Quan, M. Rahimi, C. L. Reichardt, M. Rouble, J. E. Ruhl, E. Schiappucci, J. A. Sobrin, A. A. Stark, J. Stephen, C. Tandoi, B. Thorne, C. Trendafilova, C. Umilta, J. Veitch-Michaelis, J. D. Vieira, A. Vitrier, Y. Wan, N. Whitehorn, W. L. K. Wu, M. R. Young, K. Zagorski, J. A. Zebrowski

― 6 min read


SPT's New ML Pointing SPT's New ML Pointing System Telescope. pointing accuracy at the South Pole A machine learning upgrade boosts
Table of Contents

The South Pole Telescope (SPT) is a major scientific instrument located at the Amundsen-Scott South Pole Station. It's primarily used to study the cosmic microwave background (CMB), which is the afterglow of light from the early universe. Given its remote location and harsh weather conditions, the telescope faces unique challenges in accurately Pointing to astronomical objects.

To tackle these challenges, researchers have employed Machine Learning (ML) techniques to enhance the pointing accuracy of the SPT, particularly during collaborative observing campaigns with the Event Horizon Telescope (EHT).

Why Pointing Matters

Telescopes like the SPT need to be precise when aiming at objects in the sky. Imagine trying to hit a bullseye from a great distance; the more accurate you are, the more likely you are to hit your target. In the case of telescopes, accuracy is crucial for collecting reliable data. The SPT's ability to point accurately is hampered by physical imperfections in its structure, which can be influenced by the extreme weather at the South Pole.

Most telescopes can tolerate some pointing errors, but the EHT is a bit of a perfectionist. It requires even stricter accuracy for its observations because it aims to capture the immediate environment surrounding black holes, and every tiny misalignment can lead to blurry results.

Gathering Data

To improve the SPT’s pointing, the team gathered a large dataset from both SPT observations and EHT campaigns. This data includes historical observations of various astronomical sources. Using this data, they created a training set to teach their ML models how to adjust the telescope's pointing based on current weather conditions and other factors.

The researchers trained two XGBoost models, which are a type of machine learning algorithm known for their performance on tabular data. These models learned to make adjustments for both azimuth (the horizontal angle) and elevation (the upward angle) errors in pointing.

Training the Models

Training the models involved a lot of number crunching. The team needed to teach the models how to interpret different inputs, such as weather conditions and telescope status, and map these to necessary adjustments in pointing. The training dataset consisted of observations collected over several years, which made it robust but also a bit unwieldy—think of it as trying to teach a toddler with a book that's heavy enough to be a doorstop.

Once trained, the models showed promising results. They achieved an impressive accuracy in predicting where the telescope needed to be pointed to minimize errors.

Putting the Models to the Test

After training, the next big step was to integrate these models into the telescope's control system. This step involved some serious technical wizardry—like making sure the flashlight on your smartphone can also control the temperature of your oven. The models had to work seamlessly alongside existing systems.

Once everything was in place, the team conducted a series of in situ (fancy term for "in the field") tests during an EHT observing campaign in April 2024. They gathered data on how well the models performed when they were actively controlling the telescope.

Results of the Testing

The results were promising! The use of machine learning models led to a significant improvement in pointing accuracy. The average combined pointing error dropped by a remarkable 33%, changing from a frustrating 15.9 arcseconds to a much more manageable 10.6 arcseconds.

To put that into perspective, that’s like improving your aim with a dart so that you go from consistently missing the board to hitting the bullseye more often—definitely a game-changer for astronomers trying to collect sharp images.

Room for Improvement

While the improvements were exciting, they did not fully meet the ultimate goal of achieving a pointing accuracy of 5 arcseconds. But the results still served as proof of concept that machine learning could make a real difference in telescope operations.

The team recognized that further model developments are necessary to achieve even tighter accuracy, especially in light of upcoming EHT receiver upgrades that will demand new levels of precision.

The Pointing Model Explained

The SPT uses a pointing model to compensate for structural imperfections. The model accounts for various physical processes, including:

  • Gravitational Flexure: This happens when the weight of the telescope structure causes it to sag, bending it slightly.
  • Tilts in the Mounting Axes: These can occur because of both the telescope's weight distribution and environmental factors.
  • Collimation Errors: These arise when the light path through the telescope is slightly misaligned.

The adjustments made by the pointing model use a series of calculations that relate the instructed pointing to actual sky coordinates, accommodating for these imperfections.

If you’re imagining a brainy intern painstakingly working through equations while sipping coffee, you’re not too far off from the reality of how these models function.

Weather Challenges

One of the greatest hurdles for the SPT is the extreme weather conditions. The South Pole can be a merciless place, with temperatures often plunging well below freezing. The telescope structure experiences Thermal Gradients that change with the weather and influence pointing accuracy.

At the South Pole, the warm, controlled environment of the telescope's base meets the frigid temperatures outside. This results in thermal deformations that require dynamic adjustments throughout the observing session.

In simpler terms, it’s like trying to bake a cake in a kitchen where one side is heated, and the other is absolutely frigid—the cake is bound to be a disaster if you don’t keep an eye on it.

Using Machine Learning for Adjustments

To manage these thermal deformations, the team implemented machine learning models. These models used real-time data from sensors throughout the telescope, including temperature readings and structural measurements.

The machine learning approach allowed the team to create a more responsive system. Instead of waiting until the end of an observation to check for pointing accuracy and making global corrections, the system could dynamically adjust in real time.

You might think of it like a skilled driver who can instantly steer their vehicle based on changes in road conditions rather than waiting to find out they’ve hit a pothole.

Future Plans

Looking ahead, the SPT team aims to enhance the models with more data. They are particularly excited about the SPT Wide survey, which will provide new sources covering a broader range of elevations and weather conditions.

With this new data, the team hopes to build models that can handle pointing corrections better than ever before—and perhaps make it feel as easy as shooting fish in a barrel (if that barrel were a perfectly aimed telescope).

Conclusion

The integration of machine learning into the South Pole Telescope's operations marks a significant leap forward in astronomical research. By improving pointing accuracy, researchers not only enhance the quality of their observations but also broaden the potential for groundbreaking discoveries about our universe.

As they continue to refine these models, the SPT is set to contribute even more valuable data for the EHT collaboration, unlocking new insights into the cosmos that were previously out of reach. Who knew that a little machine learning could go a long way in helping scientists reach for the stars more accurately?

Original Source

Title: Pointing Accuracy Improvements for the South Pole Telescope with Machine Learning

Abstract: We present improvements to the pointing accuracy of the South Pole Telescope (SPT) using machine learning. The ability of the SPT to point accurately at the sky is limited by its structural imperfections, which are impacted by the extreme weather at the South Pole. Pointing accuracy is particularly important during SPT participation in observing campaigns with the Event Horizon Telescope (EHT), which requires stricter accuracy than typical observations with the SPT. We compile a training dataset of historical observations of astronomical sources made with the SPT-3G and EHT receivers on the SPT. We train two XGBoost models to learn a mapping from current weather conditions to two telescope drive control arguments -- one which corrects for errors in azimuth and the other for errors in elevation. Our trained models achieve root mean squared errors on withheld test data of $2.14''$ in cross-elevation and $3.57''$ in elevation, well below our goal of $5''$ along each axis. We deploy our models on the telescope control system and perform further in situ test observations during the EHT observing campaign in 2024 April. Our models result in significantly improved pointing accuracy: for sources within the range of input variables where the models are best trained, average combined pointing error improved 33%, from $15.9''$ to $10.6''$. These improvements, while significant, fall shy of our ultimate goal, but they serve as a proof of concept for the development of future models. Planned upgrades to the EHT receiver on the SPT will necessitate even stricter pointing accuracy which will be achievable with our methods.

Authors: P. M. Chichura, A. Rahlin, A. J. Anderson, B. Ansarinejad, M. Archipley, L. Balkenhol, K. Benabed, A. N. Bender, B. A. Benson, F. Bianchini, L. E. Bleem, F. R. Bouchet, L. Bryant, E. Camphuis, J. E. Carlstrom, C. L. Chang, P. Chaubal, A. Chokshi, T. -L. Chou, A. Coerver, T. M. Crawford, C. Daley, T. de Haan, K. R. Dibert, M. A. Dobbs, M. Doohan, A. Doussot, D. Dutcher, W. Everett, C. Feng, K. R. Ferguson, K. Fichman, A. Foster, S. Galli, A. E. Gambrel, R. W. Gardner, F. Ge, N. Goeckner-Wald, R. Gualtieri, F. Guidi, S. Guns, N. W. Halverson, E. Hivon, G. P. Holder, W. L. Holzapfel, J. C. Hood, A. Hryciuk, N. Huang, F. Kéruzoré, A. R. Khalife, J. Kim, L. Knox, M. Korman, K. Kornoelje, C. -L. Kuo, K. Levy, A. E. Lowitz, C. Lu, A. Maniyar, D. P. Marrone, E. S. Martsen, F. Menanteau, M. Millea, J. Montgomery, Y. Nakato, T. Natoli, G. I. Noble, Y. Omori, S. Padin, Z. Pan, P. Paschos, K. A. Phadke, A. W. Pollak, K. Prabhu, W. Quan, M. Rahimi, C. L. Reichardt, M. Rouble, J. E. Ruhl, E. Schiappucci, J. A. Sobrin, A. A. Stark, J. Stephen, C. Tandoi, B. Thorne, C. Trendafilova, C. Umilta, J. Veitch-Michaelis, J. D. Vieira, A. Vitrier, Y. Wan, N. Whitehorn, W. L. K. Wu, M. R. Young, K. Zagorski, J. A. Zebrowski

Last Update: 2024-12-19 00:00:00

Language: English

Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.15167

Source PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.15167

Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.

Thank you to arxiv for use of its open access interoperability.

More from authors

Similar Articles