Cycle Convexity: A Deep Dive into Graphs
Explore cycle convexity in graphs and its real-world applications.
Bijo S. Anand, Ullas Chandran S. V., Julliano R. Nascimento, Revathy S. Nair
― 5 min read
Table of Contents
Graphs are like road maps, where points represent locations and lines represent connections between these points. Sometimes, we want to understand how these connections form shapes, like circles or cycles, and how we can describe these shapes in a mathematical way. This is where the idea of cycle convexity comes in.
What is Cycle Convexity?
Cycle convexity is a special way to think about graphs. A graph is cycle convex if, when you take a certain set of points (or vertices), there are no cycles (closed loops) that include those specific points. You can think of it like making a round pizza — if you only put toppings on a few slices, you only want to see those slices without closing any loops with toppings.
When we talk about the cycle convex hull, we're referring to the smallest shape that can contain all our selected points without breaking the rule of cycle convexity. It's like trying to wrap a rubber band around select slices of pizza without closing the loop.
Hull Number and Convexity Number
Now, when we want to measure how "big" our cycle convex hull is, we use something called the hull number. This number tells us the smallest group of points needed to form our hull. In contrast, the convexity number counts the largest group of points we can take while still remaining inside our shape without closing any loops.
If you think of these numbers as scoring points, the hull number is how few toppings you need to have a proper pizza and the convexity number is how many toppings you can have without ruining the pizza's shape.
Graph Products
To make things more interesting, let's mix some graphs together. Graph products are like combining different pizza recipes. For instance, we have a Cartesian product, where we combine two graphs to create a new one. Just like how a pizza can have multiple layers of deliciousness, graph products have different ways to connect points.
There are different types of graph products:
- Cartesian Product: Points from two graphs are combined based on their connections.
- Strong Product: A graph that combines connections from both graphs and also links points in a specific way.
- Lexicographic Product: This is more like a recipe that prioritizes one graph's connections over the other.
Cycle Hull Numbers in Different Graph Products
When studying cycle convexity, we find that the cycle hull number can be surprisingly simple in some graph products. For example, if we take the strong and lexicographic products of connected graphs, we find that the cycle hull number is always two. This is like saying no matter how you mix these recipes, you can always get a two-slice pizza setup.
However, the Cartesian product requires a little more thought. The cycle hull number depends on the characters of the graphs we combine. If the graphs are trees (a specific type of graph that doesn't loop back on itself), we can create a closed formula for calculating the hull number. This is similar to discovering the perfect recipe for a multi-layered cake that works every time.
Complexity Matters
Now, here's where it gets spicy — the complexity of determining these hull numbers. Some problems seem simple when you first look at them but are actually super complicated and hard to solve, like trying to find your way out of a labyrinth. When we dig deeper, we find it's NP-complete to figure out the hull number. In simpler terms, this means there's no quick solution to finding the smallest set in certain types of graphs.
This creates a challenging aspect for mathematicians, who enjoy the thrill of solving tough puzzles. For example, even if we have a two-layer structure in a Cartesian product graph, finding the hull number can still feel like deciphering a code.
Cycle Convexity and Real-World Applications
Why does this matter, you ask? Well, understanding cycle convexity has real-world implications, especially in fields like computer science, networking, and even biology. For instance, in networking, making sure data packets travel optimally can be likened to finding the best cycle convex paths for graphs.
Additionally, methods developed in cycle convexity can also be applied to solve problems in other areas, like knot theory, where scientists study the shapes and links of knots, much like connecting roads in a graph.
Conclusion
Cycle convexity is a fascinating area that merges art and science — the art of shaping graphs and the science of calculating hull numbers. Through various graph products and the complexity involved in solving these problems, mathematicians find a rich field to explore. So, while it may just seem like a series of lines and dots, the world of graphs and cycle convexity opens up a whole new universe of mathematical flavors to enjoy!
In the end, think of cycle convexity as a delightful puzzle, combining the best bits of graphs with a sprinkle of complexity, resulting in a dish that is both challenging and rewarding. So, grab your metaphorical math pizza, and let's get to slicing!
Original Source
Title: Complexity and Structural Results for the Hull and Convexity Numbers in Cycle Convexity for Graph Products
Abstract: Let $G$ be a graph and $S \subseteq V(G)$. In the cycle convexity, we say that $S$ is \textit{cycle convex} if for any $u\in V(G)\setminus S$, the induced subgraph of $S\cup\{u\}$ contains no cycle that includes $u$. The \textit{cycle convex hull} of $S$ is the smallest convex set containing $S$. The \textit{cycle hull number} of $G$, denoted by $hn_{cc}(G)$, is the cardinality of the smallest set $S$ such that the convex hull of $S$ is $V(G)$. The \textit{convexity number} of $G$, denoted by $C_{cc}(G)$, is the maximum cardinality of a proper convex set of $V(G)$. This paper studies cycle convexity in graph products. We show that the cycle hull number is always two for strong and lexicographic products. For the Cartesian, we establish tight bounds for this product and provide a closed formula when the factors are trees, generalizing an existing result for grid graphs. In addition, given a graph $G$ and an integer $k$, we prove that $hn_{cc}(G) \leq k$ is NP-complete even if $G$ is a bipartite Cartesian product graph, addressing an open question in the literature. Furthermore, we present exact formulas for the cycle convexity number in those three graph products. That leads to the NP-completeness of, given a graph $G$ and an integer $k$, deciding whether $C_{cc}(G) \geq k$, when $G$ is a Cartesian, strong or lexicographic product graph.
Authors: Bijo S. Anand, Ullas Chandran S. V., Julliano R. Nascimento, Revathy S. Nair
Last Update: 2024-12-26 00:00:00
Language: English
Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.19258
Source PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.19258
Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.
Thank you to arxiv for use of its open access interoperability.