Improving Surgical Safety Through Checklists
A hospital in Ethiopia boosts surgery safety with a simple checklist.
Melaku Teshale Gemechu, Anteneh Cheru Adinew, Elias Ermias Ledamo
― 6 min read
Table of Contents
- The Importance of the Surgical Safety Checklist
- Challenges in SSC Implementation
- A Case Study: Wondo Genet Primary Hospital
- Recognizing the Need for Improvement
- Gathering Data and Measuring Success
- Implementing Change: The Plan-Do-Study-Act Model
- Monitoring Progress
- Building a Culture of Safety
- Conclusion: A Model for Other Hospitals
- Original Source
In the world of surgery, keeping patients safe is the top priority. To help with this, hospitals use something called a Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC). This handy tool is like a to-do list for doctors and nurses, ensuring that every important safety step is followed before, during, and after a surgery. It aims to help save lives and improve the quality of care.
Imagine you're baking a cake. You wouldn't want to forget the eggs or the flour, right? The SSC does the same for surgeries, making sure nothing vital gets left out. Numerous studies have shown that using this checklist can significantly lower the chances of complications during surgery, making it a key part of patient safety.
The Importance of the Surgical Safety Checklist
The SSC was introduced by the World Health Organization (WHO) to enhance surgical safety globally. When surgeons and health teams use the checklist properly, it helps in reducing both Mortality (death) and Morbidity (complications). This is especially crucial in countries like Ethiopia, where the healthcare system is still growing and improving.
In fact, one of the goals for Ethiopian hospitals is to have a 100% usage rate of the SSC by 2025. While many hospitals are trying to adopt this practice, not everyone is doing it consistently. It's like showing up to a party but forgetting your dance moves; you're there, but not fully present!
Challenges in SSC Implementation
Unfortunately, there are several challenges that hospitals face when trying to use the SSC effectively. For instance, not all surgeries are treated equally. Emergency surgeries and those done late at night often show lower Compliance with the checklist. It’s as if the checklist takes a nap when the night shift kicks in!
Some common hurdles include misunderstandings about how the checklist works, language barriers, and even a lack of teamwork among medical staff. When team members don’t communicate well, it's difficult to ensure that everyone is on the same page—much like trying to coordinate a surprise party with friends who are all texting in different group chats.
A Case Study: Wondo Genet Primary Hospital
Let's zoom in on Wondo Genet Primary Hospital (WGPH) in Ethiopia, which has been using the SSC since it opened. This new rural hospital, established in September 2022, faced significant challenges. The team there was inexperienced, and the SSC was often not used properly. Imagine trying to play a game without knowing the rules; things can get messy quickly.
Over an 18-month period, the hospital performed surgeries on 226 patients. Despite using the SSC, compliance with the checklist wasn’t close to the national goal. In fact, during the first six months after the hospital opened, only about half of the surgeries followed the checklist. That’s like bringing a pizza to a potluck but only slicing half of it!
Recognizing the Need for Improvement
The leadership at WGPH realized that they needed to make some changes to improve the use of the SSC. They decided to start a quality improvement initiative to ensure that everyone in the surgical team was using the checklist correctly. By focusing on the SSC, the hospital aimed to improve Safety Culture and patient outcomes.
The plan was ambitious. They set a goal to achieve 100% utilization of the SSC within three months. Now that’s setting the bar high, like trying to jump over a fence that seems a bit too tall.
Gathering Data and Measuring Success
To kick off their improvement plan, the team at WGPH collected data on how often the SSC was used over the past year. They discovered that the average utilization rate was only 50%, which means many teams were still missing out on essential safety steps. It was especially common for the “sign-out” section to be incomplete, resulting in confusion and mistakes.
They also used a handy little tool called the driver diagram. This diagram helped them identify the key factors affecting compliance, such as the need for more training and better communication among team members. By spotting these areas for improvement, they could focus their efforts where they would be most effective.
Implementing Change: The Plan-Do-Study-Act Model
The team decided to use a structured approach called the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) model. This method involves making a plan, trying it out, checking if it works, and then acting on what is learned. It’s like trying out a new recipe: you follow the steps, see how it turns out, and make adjustments for next time.
To start, the team translated the SSC into Amharic, the local language. They believed that this would help staff understand the checklist better and make it easier to use. They also organized a two-day training session for surgical staff to ensure everyone was on board with the new plan.
Additionally, they established routines to ensure that surgeons stayed in the room until the checklist was completed. This was a big step, considering that the sign-out section had often been neglected. They also set up briefings before and after operations to encourage open communication—like morning coffee chats, but with surgical outcomes at stake.
Monitoring Progress
Throughout the three-month initiative, the team closely monitored compliance with the SSC through regular audits. They were like detectives, keeping a close eye on the evidence to see whether their changes were making a difference. These audits revealed a steady improvement in how the checklist was used.
By the end of the intervention, WGPH proudly announced that they achieved a 100% utilization and completion rate for the SSC. That’s like hitting a home run in the final inning! They also found that all patients received timely prophylactic antibiotics, and there were no lost or mislabeled surgical specimens during this period.
Building a Culture of Safety
The success at WGPH highlighted the importance of building a safety culture within the surgical team. By implementing regular training, ongoing audits, and an emphasis on teamwork, they fostered an environment where everyone shared responsibility for patient safety.
The hospital recognized that these practices needed to continue even after the initial intervention. Therefore, they planned to hold regular training sessions and monthly check-ins to keep everyone engaged. They wanted their team to think of the SSC not just as a tool, but as an integral part of their daily operations—like brushing their teeth.
Conclusion: A Model for Other Hospitals
The journey of Wondo Genet Primary Hospital serves as a valuable example for other hospitals, both in Ethiopia and around the world. Their experience proves that it’s possible to improve surgical safety protocols, even in rural settings with fewer resources.
Thanks to their hard work and determination, WGPH set an example of what can be achieved with the right mindset and a commitment to patient safety. Who would have thought that a simple checklist could lead to such significant changes? It’s a story filled with hope and the potential for better outcomes for patients everywhere.
In the end, remember that in the world of surgery, a little humor goes a long way. After all, if laughter is the best medicine, then a thorough checklist must be the second best!
Original Source
Title: Quality Improvement (QI) Project: Enhancing Surgical Safety Checklist Utilization at a Rural Primary Hospital
Abstract: BackgroundDespite evidence demonstrating the benefits of the World Health Organization (WHO) Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC), its utilization is less frequent in countries with a lower Human Development Index (HDI). This quality improvement project aimed to enhance SSC utilization in a rural primary hospital to address critical issues, including inconsistent administration of prophylactic antibiotics, frequent instances of lost or mislabeled surgical specimens, and inadequate preparedness for essential surgical instruments and blood products. MethodsThis quality improvement project was conducted at a Primary Hospital, a rural facility in Ethiopia, to address suboptimal utilization of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC). The surgical team included 2 specialists, 2 anesthetists, and 5 nurses, with an average SSC utilization rate of 50% and a completion rate of 80% over the prior 18 months. A Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) approach was employed to enhance adherence. Key interventions included translating the SSC into Amharic, conducting a two-day training session, introducing pre- and post-operative briefings, and requiring surgeons to remain in the operating room until checklist completion. Bi-weekly audits and regular supervision were conducted to monitor progress, with feedback loops established to guide adjustments. The effectiveness of the intervention was assessed through quantitative and qualitative methods. Key performance indicators included SSC utilization and completion rates, with secondary metrics such as prophylactic antibiotic administration and surgical site infection rates. Trend analysis using run charts and Interrupted Time Series (ITS) analysis evaluated changes over time, while staff interviews provided insights into behavioral and attitudinal shifts. Sustained improvements were reinforced through ongoing training, monthly supervision, and staff recognition initiatives. ResultsThe quality improvement project demonstrated a significant and sustained improvement in the utilization and completion rates of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC). Baseline measurements in October 2023 showed a utilization rate of 53% and a completion rate of 65%. Following targeted interventions, both metrics steadily improved, reaching 100% by June 2024 and maintaining this level through September 2024. ConclusionThe QI project demonstrated that achieving 100% utilization and completion of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC) is feasible even in rural hospitals of low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Formal training proved crucial for improving adherence, addressing gaps seen with informal approaches, and fostering better team communication and culture. Challenges such as incomplete Sign-out sections and language barriers were mitigated by adapting the SSC to local contexts, including translation. These findings highlight the importance of structured interventions and localized solutions in enhancing surgical safety practices and inspire broader implementation in similar resource-limited settings.
Authors: Melaku Teshale Gemechu, Anteneh Cheru Adinew, Elias Ermias Ledamo
Last Update: 2024-12-26 00:00:00
Language: English
Source URL: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.12.06.24318304
Source PDF: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.12.06.24318304.full.pdf
Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.
Thank you to medrxiv for use of its open access interoperability.