Integrated Care: A Solution for NCDs in Kenya
Exploring integrated care to combat non-communicable diseases in Kenya.
Elvis O. A. Wambiya, James Odhiambo Oguta, Robert Akparibo, Duncan Gillespie, Peter Otieno, Catherine Akoth, Jemima Kamano, Peter Kibe, Yvette Kisaka, Elizabeth Onyango, Gladwell Gathecha, Peter J. Dodd
― 7 min read
Table of Contents
- Cardiometabolic Problems
- Integrated Care: A Possible Solution
- A Closer Look at Kenya
- Research Methods Used
- Getting the Scoop: Who Was Interviewed
- What’s the Deal with Integrated Care?
- Challenges in the System
- The Silo Mentality
- The Funding Debate
- Recommendations for a Better Future
- The Importance of Evidence
- Moving Forward with Integrated Care
- Conclusion: A Healthier Tomorrow
- Original Source
Non-communicable Diseases, or NCDs, are health issues that are not contagious but can cause serious problems for individuals and healthcare systems. They include diseases like heart disease, diabetes, and cancer. Globally, these kinds of diseases are a huge cause of death, accounting for about 74% of all fatalities. This number is even higher in low-and-middle-income countries (LMICs), where NCDs are responsible for around 77% of deaths. It seems like these diseases are the unwanted party guests that just refuse to leave.
Cardiometabolic Problems
Among the various NCDs, cardiometabolic diseases take the cake as leading offenders. This group includes heart diseases and diabetes, and they often go hand in hand, making trouble for the people who have them. With the rise of NCDs, more people are finding themselves dealing with multiple chronic conditions at the same time-this is called Multimorbidity. Multimorbidity does not only impact an individual’s health; it can also drain their wallet, as managing multiple diseases often requires more resources than just one.
Integrated Care: A Possible Solution
To tackle the challenges posed by multiple chronic diseases, healthcare experts are increasingly looking at integrated care as a way forward. Integrated care aims to reduce fragmentation in healthcare services and ensure that individuals receive comprehensive and coordinated treatment. This means instead of running all over town to see different doctors for different diseases, a patient may visit one clinic where all their health needs are addressed at once. Imagine a “one-stop shop” for your health! It’s like getting an all-you-can-eat buffet but for healthcare services.
A Closer Look at Kenya
In Kenya, NCDs are a significant problem, accounting for 41% of annual deaths. Among these, cardiometabolic diseases are especially worrisome, as conditions like heart disease and diabetes make up a big chunk of the NCD burden. Strengthening Primary Healthcare is key in managing these diseases, as it helps with both prevention and treatment, ultimately aiming for universal health coverage (UHC).
Despite the importance of integrated care, it still faces many roadblocks in Kenya. Although there are policies that support integrated models, the actual implementation on the ground is often lacking. This is much like having a shiny new toy that no one knows how to play with.
Research Methods Used
To get a better understanding of these issues, a study was conducted that involved interviews with key stakeholders in healthcare within Kenya. These stakeholders included government officials, researchers, healthcare professionals, and health economists. The goal was to gain insights into their views about integrated care and the challenges faced in its implementation.
The researchers looked at how these leaders defined integrated care, what they saw as barriers, and what recommendations they had for better implementation. They didn’t just stick to the surface; they went deeper, using a framework called the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care (RMIC), which helps break down the different levels and dimensions of care.
Getting the Scoop: Who Was Interviewed
The study included 16 stakeholders who have a hand in healthcare delivery and policy. Most of these individuals were women, and they generally had extensive experience in the healthcare sector. The discussions they had were rich with perspectives regarding the current state of healthcare in Kenya, particularly as it relates to NCDs.
What’s the Deal with Integrated Care?
So, how did these stakeholders define integrated care? Many viewed it as providing holistic, patient-centered healthcare in a “one-stop shop.” The idea was that patients would receive treatment for all their conditions in one place instead of hopping from one clinic to another. This certainly makes sense-after all, who wants to juggle appointments like a circus performer?
Challenges in the System
Even if the idea of integrated care sounds great, there are many challenges in making it a reality. One of the biggest issues is the gap between policy and practice. On paper, there are plenty of guidelines and strategies for integrated care. However, in practice, implementing these policies remains a struggle, mainly due to a lack of resources and coordination.
Several stakeholders pointed out that while guidelines exist around NCDs, actual integration of care at the primary care level remains unclear. It’s almost as if there is a fancy cake recipe, but no one knows how to bake it!
The Silo Mentality
Another big barrier is the “silo mentality,” where different departments and clinics operate in isolation rather than working together. Picture a group of people at a party who refuse to mingle with anyone outside their small group. This kind of fragmentation leads to inefficient healthcare delivery and limits patients’ access to comprehensive care.
The Funding Debate
Funding, or lack thereof, is another thorn in the side of integrated care. Many healthcare initiatives in Kenya rely heavily on donor funding, often focused on specific diseases like HIV and malaria. When donor priorities do not align with local healthcare needs, it creates gaps in care for NCDs. It’s as if the focus is on throwing a grand party for a few guests while ignoring the majority who also want to join the fun.
Recommendations for a Better Future
During the interviews, stakeholders offered a wealth of recommendations to improve the situation. Here are some of the key ideas they suggested:
-
Clear Guidelines: There’s a strong need for clear, standardized guidelines to help implement integrated care effectively. This means creating a road map that tells everyone how to get where they need to go without losing their way.
-
Collaborative Efforts: Bringing together different stakeholders, including healthcare providers, community members, and policymakers, is vital. It’s about creating an inclusive environment where everyone can contribute to the solution.
-
Proper Training: Training healthcare workers to manage multiple conditions is crucial. Well-trained staff can help streamline processes and improve patient outcomes, ensuring that everyone receives the best care possible.
-
Funding Models: New funding models that prioritize integrated care should be developed. Rather than focusing solely on specific diseases, funding can be allocated to support comprehensive care models that address multiple health issues.
-
Advocacy for Change: Continuous advocacy efforts are needed to ensure that policymakers remain aware of the importance of integrated care and the challenges that come with it. This is about keeping the conversation going so that integrated care doesn’t become yesterday’s news.
The Importance of Evidence
One of the recurring themes in the interviews was the need for evidence-based research. Gathering data on the effectiveness of integrated care models can help guide future decisions and ensure that resources are allocated wisely. After all, you wouldn’t want to invest in a new gadget that turns out to be a flop, would you?
Moving Forward with Integrated Care
As Kenya navigates the complex landscape of healthcare, the recommendations from these stakeholders could serve as a guide. By focusing on integrated care for cardiometabolic diseases, the healthcare system can become more efficient and patient-focused.
If implemented effectively, integrated care could lead to better health outcomes, reduced financial burdens for individuals, and a more efficient healthcare system overall. Plus, who wouldn’t want to visit just one clinic instead of multiple ones?
Conclusion: A Healthier Tomorrow
In summary, the journey towards effective integrated care in Kenya is filled with obstacles, from funding issues to the silo mindset. However, with proper guidelines, collaborative efforts, and sufficient training, the future of healthcare can become significantly brighter. Everyone deserves to access comprehensive care that addresses all their health needs.
With continued advocacy, evidence-based research, and a focus on integrated care, Kenya can pave the way for a healthier tomorrow-where healthcare is as easy and pleasant as visiting a well-run café.
And if that café happens to serve a good cup of tea, all the better!
Title: Stakeholder perspectives on the barriers and facilitators to integrating cardiovascular disease and diabetes management at primary care in Kenya
Abstract: Integrated care is increasingly recognised as a key strategy for the management of multimorbidity. However, evidence on the factors associated with the implementation of integrated care models in low- and middle-income countries remains limited. We explored how stakeholders perceived integrated care, existing challenges, and recommendations for integrating cardiovascular disease and diabetes management at primary health care (PHC) level in Kenya. We conducted a qualitative study using key informant interviews with 16 key stakeholders involved in healthcare delivery, research, and policy on non-communicable diseases (NCDs) in Kenya between February and March 2024. All interviews were audio recorded and transcribed; and the data analysed both inductively and deductively within NVivo software. The deductive analysis was guided by the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care (RMIC) framework, which combines key dimensions necessary for successful integrated care with key elements of primary care. The RMIC framework dimensions include systems, clinical, organisational, professional, functional, and normative integration. Out of the six RMIC dimensions, stakeholders description of integrated care included elements of clinical, systems, and professional integration. Key systems level challenges included disparity between policy and practice, inadequate resource allocation, donor-driven priorities, and limited stakeholder collaboration. Fragmented care delivery was a key organisational challenge. Limited resources for integrated care delivery and inadequate staff numbers and capacity were considered key challenges in the functional and professional dimensions of the RMIC framework. Additional challenges included siloed mindset (normative) and limited evidence on effective or cost-effective integrated care models. To address the identified barriers, policy-makers should develop clear and adaptable how-to county-specific guidelines for implementation and evaluation of integrated care at PHC level. There is a need for advocacy and research on models of integrated care at PHC level to guide prioritization and resource allocation in Kenya.
Authors: Elvis O. A. Wambiya, James Odhiambo Oguta, Robert Akparibo, Duncan Gillespie, Peter Otieno, Catherine Akoth, Jemima Kamano, Peter Kibe, Yvette Kisaka, Elizabeth Onyango, Gladwell Gathecha, Peter J. Dodd
Last Update: Dec 27, 2024
Language: English
Source URL: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.12.25.24319646
Source PDF: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.12.25.24319646.full.pdf
Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.
Thank you to medrxiv for use of its open access interoperability.