Calibre: Transforming Personalized Federated Learning
Calibre enhances personalized federated learning with better model performance and fairness.
Sijia Chen, Ningxin Su, Baochun Li
― 5 min read
Table of Contents
- The Challenge of Data Diversity
- What is Personalized Federated Learning?
- The Role of Self-Supervised Learning
- The Problem with Fuzzy Class Boundaries
- Introducing Calibre: A New Framework
- The Two-step Process of Calibre
- Why Does Calibre Work?
- Experimental Results: The Proof is in the Pudding
- Testing with Real Datasets
- Handling Unseen Clients
- Conclusion: The Future of Personalized Learning
- Original Source
- Reference Links
Federated learning (FL) is an approach that allows multiple clients, like smartphones or other devices, to collaborate in training a shared model without exchanging their private data. You can think of it as a big group project where everyone contributes but keeps their homework to themselves. This way, the model can learn from diverse data while respecting individual privacy.
The Challenge of Data Diversity
In the world of federated learning, not all clients have the same types of data. For example, one client might have lots of pictures of cats, while another might have pictures of dogs. This variation, known as non-i.i.d. (non-independent and identically distributed) data, can create challenges. When clients have different data distributions, the performance of the trained model may vary. This leads to what's called "model unfairness," where some clients may perform better than others.
Personalized Federated Learning?
What isPersonalized federated learning (pFL) aims to create models that work specifically well for individual clients. Imagine if each student in a group project could also receive a special copy of the project tailored just for them. In pFL, a shared global model is trained, and each client uses this model as a base to create their personalized version. The goal is to balance fairness—so all clients can perform well—with overall model performance.
Self-Supervised Learning
The Role ofSelf-supervised learning (SSL) is a technique that allows a model to learn from unlabeled data. Think of it as studying without a textbook—just figuring things out on your own through observation. In the context of pFL, SSL is seen as a promising approach because it can produce a global model that is quite generic. However, it can struggle when clients' data is very different from one another.
The Problem with Fuzzy Class Boundaries
While SSL helps create a flexible model, the downside is that it may generate representations with fuzzy class boundaries. This means that when different classes (like cats and dogs) are mixed, they don't form clear groups. Imagine trying to identify your friend in a blurry crowd photo; it's tough! This lack of clarity can lead to poor performance for personalized models, which rely on these representations to be accurate.
Introducing Calibre: A New Framework
To tackle the challenges of pFL and SSL, a new framework called Calibre was introduced. Calibre aims to refine the representations produced by SSL. Its goal is to strike a balance between being generic enough for everyone but detailed enough for each client's specific needs.
The Two-step Process of Calibre
Calibre follows a two-step process. First, it trains a global model using SSL. This model captures broad patterns from the data, allowing it to work for many clients. Second, each client customizes this global model to suit their unique data. This way, clients get the best of both worlds: a solid foundation from the global model and the ability to specialize it further.
Why Does Calibre Work?
Calibre introduces a mechanism that focuses on prototypes. Think of a prototype as a sample saying, "This is what a cat looks like." By creating prototypes for different classes, Calibre can help the model learn clearer boundaries. During the training process, clients will compare their data to these prototypes, leading to better accuracy and performance.
Experimental Results: The Proof is in the Pudding
Various experiments have shown that Calibre performs impressively in different testing scenarios. When compared with other existing methods, Calibre consistently achieved better overall performance and fairness across clients. It was like the star student in a class of overachievers!
Testing with Real Datasets
To see how well Calibre worked, it was tested on popular datasets like CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100. The results showed that Calibre not only provided high mean accuracy but also ensured that the variance in accuracy among clients was low. This means that no one was left behind, much like ensuring every child gets a slice of cake at a birthday party!
Handling Unseen Clients
Calibre also showed an interesting ability to generalize well to new clients that weren't part of the training process. Imagine a new student joining a class halfway through the school year. With Calibre's flexibility, this new student could catch up quickly and contribute to group projects.
Conclusion: The Future of Personalized Learning
In summary, Calibre represents a significant step forward in the world of personalized federated learning. By expertly balancing the need for generic understanding with the importance of client-specific information, it helps ensure that everyone gets a fair chance at learning and performing well. As technology continues to evolve, approaches like Calibre will likely play a key role in making machine learning smarter and more equitable for all.
So, next time you think about how a group project might benefit from individual input, remember that even in the realm of artificial intelligence, it’s all about collaboration and customization!
Original Source
Title: Calibre: Towards Fair and Accurate Personalized Federated Learning with Self-Supervised Learning
Abstract: In the context of personalized federated learning, existing approaches train a global model to extract transferable representations, based on which any client could train personalized models with a limited number of data samples. Self-supervised learning is considered a promising direction as the global model it produces is generic and facilitates personalization for all clients fairly. However, when data is heterogeneous across clients, the global model trained using SSL is unable to learn high-quality personalized models. In this paper, we show that when the global model is trained with SSL without modifications, its produced representations have fuzzy class boundaries. As a result, personalized learning within each client produces models with low accuracy. In order to improve SSL towards better accuracy without sacrificing its advantage in fairness, we propose Calibre, a new personalized federated learning framework designed to calibrate SSL representations by maintaining a suitable balance between more generic and more client-specific representations. Calibre is designed based on theoretically-sound properties, and introduces (1) a client-specific prototype loss as an auxiliary training objective; and (2) an aggregation algorithm guided by such prototypes across clients. Our experimental results in an extensive array of non-i.i.d.~settings show that Calibre achieves state-of-the-art performance in terms of both mean accuracy and fairness across clients. Code repo: https://github.com/TL-System/plato/tree/main/examples/ssl/calibre.
Authors: Sijia Chen, Ningxin Su, Baochun Li
Last Update: 2024-12-27 00:00:00
Language: English
Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.20020
Source PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.20020
Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Changes: This summary was created with assistance from AI and may have inaccuracies. For accurate information, please refer to the original source documents linked here.
Thank you to arxiv for use of its open access interoperability.